Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

Good to see with the formation of Rocket force, we are seeing so many FATAH series tests. Serious change in doctrine for Army. On Kashmir mountains it will be artillery and missiles will be rain down on India from left to right and possibly all the way to South if requires. Also like someone said, PAF will be freed up from air to ground role more.
 
New Notam with a diameter of roughly 430-450 kilometers

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


View attachment 197235

This could be Fatah-3 surely? Fatah-2 has already been tested so many times recently
 
No drop down intake in this one @Oscar you have worked on the program right? this seems longer and has a intake in lined with the body... Can it be an upgraded version Cuz the missile is a lil slimmer?
Any comments?
No
I have never worked on this program.

I have however - seen - the entire code that was run for the guidance algorithm for the first one which was run on a floating pt dsp.
 
It was C for that specific aspect - and yes C was still preferred the more than 15 years ago when I was in that role.
I remember there were tongue and cheeks comments about C language in the western media...no flattering
 
It was C for that specific aspect - and yes C was still preferred the more than 15 years ago when I was in that role.

And I believe C/C++ is still preferred today... they taught us C++ in the first semester only and then drilled us in Python for the rest of our AI degree which I believe has minimum role in coding these in-flight guidance systems algorithms
 
Good to see with the formation of Rocket force, we are seeing so many FATAH series tests. Serious change in doctrine for Army. On Kashmir mountains it will be artillery and missiles will be rain down on India from left to right and possibly all the way to South if requires. Also like someone said, PAF will be freed up from air to ground role more.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It already neutralised
 
Each language has its issues - but C by far was best suited for the needs of many systems and is why it’s used in the F-35 and JF-17.
No surprise F 35 had recurring software problems...Jf 17 has much simpler architecture...I don't know much about this field so forgive me for my ignorance
 
Each language has its issues - but C by far was best suited for the needs of many systems and is why it’s used in the F-35 and JF-17.

JF17 is C++, not C according to all commentary I have seen.

F-35 Coding standards : https://www.stroustrup.com/JSF-AV-rules.pdf




There is very little reason to use C these days and this has been the case for some time when you have C++ available.
 
Last edited:
Slow flying non-Stealthy standard cruise missiles might not have the same usefulness it had 20-15 years ago.

Modern AD with AESA sensors are too good for these things. Unless you have something as stealthy as JASSM.

Just my personal opinion.
 
Slow flying non-Stealthy standard cruise missiles might not have the same usefulness it had 20-15 years ago.

Modern AD with AESA sensors are too good for these things. Unless you have something as stealthy as JASSM.

Just my personal opinion.
If they had no use the Americans would have stopped using tomahawks a long time ago.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top