Toxic
Trusted Member
We have access to some Chinese tech which Iran didn't so that should definitely benefit us.Yes before that whether ours are better then Indians or Iranians ? we can never know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have access to some Chinese tech which Iran didn't so that should definitely benefit us.Yes before that whether ours are better then Indians or Iranians ? we can never know.
No idea maybe speed or maybe Indian AD had difficulty locking as f1 rocket is smallIndians seemed to have somewhat of difficult time intercepting F1s what could be the case there?
Speed as mentioned by COL. Qurershi "Very high speed" missiles.No idea maybe speed or maybe Indian AD had difficulty locking as f1 rocket is small
How fast are fattah ?
Plus,
I had misconception that if missile has speed of mach 18 or 15 which I believe is of shaheen missile is. It has in its all ballistic path. Now I came to know that at terminal stage speed due to factors of earth atmosphere is different to mid course and initial phase.
So, when you mentioned someone said working on hypersonic options does it mean that missile or vehicles in terminal stage have hypersonic speed ?
Actually this came to my mind as a what if ... we have been preparing for our eastern neighbor .. but what if we are up against the best stealthy things ... so yeah may be there we need things like iran.. .. that was the origin of my thoughtso whats our standings in missile systems are we at par with iran or above ... how is it.. if we compare with iran
Yes this concept should be explored.Exploring powered re-entry vehicles to increase speed (Mach 10+) and perform better evasive maneuvers to defeat advanced air defenses may be worth considering for Pakistan.
Similar in concept to the Iranian Fattah-1.
View attachment 129775
Than its above supersonic and point of impactSpeed as mentioned by COL. Qurershi "Very high speed" missiles.
And I think this is the time to @iss of our neighbor once more by showing hypersonic missiles.We are already working on hypersonic CM it should be near completion, and historically we only publicly test these type of systems when we have to show some deterrence.
Prithvi based AD complete failed 8 of these interceptors fell in Amritsar, I am not sure due to our EWS or because of their own design failure.No idea maybe speed or maybe Indian AD had difficulty locking as f1 rocket is small
and mass produce them cheaply. And have the nerve to resort to them too.This war has highlighted this vulnerability for us. We either did not want to escalate or may be Fatah series missiles weren't that effective.We are lacking in hypersonic B.M, we should develop and test hypersonic B.M and cruise missiles.
It wasn't the Fatah that wasn't effective it was our BDAand mass produce them cheaply. And have the nerve to resort to them too.This war has highlighted this vulnerability for us. We either did not want to escalate or may be Fatah series missiles weren't that effective.
No, there are external fins on F3, the photo is really poor quality, but they are there, in the same configuration as F2.External Control fins only increase drag limiting the missile speed.
So Pakistan has moved away from external fins
Earlier Shaheen Versions had fins.
Even you can see fins on Fatah-2 but Fatah-3 comes with no fins at all
I suspect 50km increase in range may be due to Separable Warhead + Finless design.
View attachment 128018
F3 - Finless & Separable Warhead Design
View attachment 128019
F2 - central and baseline Fins design
maybe they know by using chinese satellites but it is not made public?It wasn't the Fatah that wasn't effective it was our BDA
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.