Pakistan Navy | News & Discussions

AFAIK ciws on zulfiqar are type 730 or 1130. These are really good against ashm. With 2 on single zulfiqar class provide great support. It may not be good against jets and c802 may have limited range but its not teethless.

And these guns are way way better than ak630 or kashtan.

Same is case pak went for tpe 1130 in tughril class.

if such big ships are bought and then pn had no money for fl3000n is pure b.s.
so why did PN not have enough money for the towed array sonar?

Why was it deleted?
 
so why did PN not have enough money for the towed array sonar?

Why was it deleted?
Whats the latest news on it ? I have known enough officers who tell stories to demean equipment to keep it secret.

The value of towed array sonar is obviously understood by navy. Who says they are not installed ? I dont believe it. If some senior members said so. I am sorry to that member i dont mean disrespect. Its just not possible. You get ly80, antiships, anti submarine rockets, torpedoes. 2 type 730 ciws which are really expensive but say no to towed array sonar ?

What is cost of each of these systems first of all ?

Ill research and then ill get back.

Till now type 730 can defend against super sonics as well.

The reason americans have difficulty against them is due to phalanx being old ciws with less rate of fire and accuracy.

I could be wrong. So, im open to corrections.

Peace brothers.
 
@Ak01 I discussed with someone and studied a little bit. The tughril for its class without towed array sonar is a ship on suicide. Plus, towed array sonar is part of package of type 054A pakistan has paid full cose for it. Not a stripped down version.

Shared picture is not enough to justify tughril doesnt have it.

So i dont believe what you say.
 
@Ak01 I discussed with someone and studied a little bit. The tughril for its class without towed array sonar is a ship on suicide. Plus, towed array sonar is part of package of type 054A pakistan has paid full cose for it. Not a stripped down version.

Shared picture is not enough to justify tughril doesnt have it.

So i dont believe what you say.
ok bro the towed array just teleports.
 
Whats the latest news on it ? I have known enough officers who tell stories to demean equipment to keep it secret.

The value of towed array sonar is obviously understood by navy. Who says they are not installed ? I dont believe it. If some senior members said so. I am sorry to that member i dont mean disrespect. Its just not possible. You get ly80, antiships, anti submarine rockets, torpedoes. 2 type 730 ciws which are really expensive but say no to towed array sonar ?

What is cost of each of these systems first of all ?

Ill research and then ill get back.

Till now type 730 can defend against super sonics as well.

The reason americans have difficulty against them is due to phalanx being old ciws with less rate of fire and accuracy.

I could be wrong. So, im open to corrections.

Peace brothers.
GIDS make the Towed Arrays in Pakistan.
I dont see any reason why these cant be installed.
 
GIDS make the Towed Arrays in Pakistan.
I dont see any reason why these cant be installed.
Its average 10 to 20 million dollar system and ship itself is roughly 400 million yet no tas is pure bullhorns
 
Its average 10 to 20 million dollar system and ship itself is roughly 400 million yet no tas is pure bullhorns
so prove otherwise.

Show us this magical teleporting TAS.
 
I thought JCF is supposed to be ASW frigates? Probably another brilliant short sighted decision if they plan to put it on JCF
 
GIDS make SLTAs for submarines. They are NOT the same thing.
SLTA is not specific to Subs. As per GIDS its for small to medium size vessels.
Says on their website. They also manufacture the Processor for these.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top