Ibbi32
Registered Member
Theres something called overlapping sensor coverage and escort formation you dont seem to understand
Pakistan Navy | News & Discussions
- Thread starter Bullzz
- Start date
Theres something called overlapping sensor coverage and escort formation you dont seem to understand
Toxic
Trusted Member
Why would they come inside the range of shore based Ashms? Or are we willing to risk sending our ships into the range of their Ashms especially considering The small number of VLS cells PN ships carry?
kimjongun
Registered Member
You think PN would let IN come some 300km close to shoreline so that we resort to Using Zarbs??
IN will use it's superior range of missiles to stay fae from PNs onslaught I'd say.
Ibbi32
Registered Member
Notable at present brahmos outranges all but harbahs and those arent in widespread service yet
Yasser76
Elite Member
Nope, IN would not play an active role, the waters are far too dangerous. 2019 and 2025 actions prove me right and your wishful thinking wrong, and since those two skirmishes Pakistani missile range has increased, sea based IN missile range has not
Yasser76
Elite Member
Again, take your pick about the many ways we can fry IN....
Aziqbal
Elite Member
So your saying that Pakistani military officials / ISPR including the Prime Minster himself are lying about the naval role of the JF17 block 2 carrying CM-400 AKG missiles to attack Indian aircraft carriers if they closed less than 400 km to Pakistan shoreline?
Or you think CM-400AKG is not hypersonic which according to PAF does reach hypersonic speed in the terminal phase
Wow wait who should I believe a fanboy or official sources
It’s not a hard one for me unfortunately
Toxic
Trusted Member
We should launch you from a JF-17, the Indians will probably scuttle their ships as soon they see you on their radar screens.
doing a bit more reading.
Theres multiple flights of 054A v1, the PN ones seem to be of Flight 1 config.
looking at this photo, when zoomed in, you can see the same shape inside of the cutout as you do in the reference pic, so i guess that solves it, the PN's 054A's DO have towed arrays, but in this case, lack the towed decoys.
Though, for what its worth, the reference pic uses an inferrence.
What the original doc says is that, the port cutout was present in the 054, the starboard was not, logically it makes more sense to have a torpedo countermeasure system onboard than a towed array, thus the port cutout MUST be a torpedo countermeasure, then on the 054A, we see both port and starboard cutouts, so the starboard one MUST be a SLTA.
the cutout just wasnt very clear in the PN pics, so it looked like there was nothing.
So what we now know is that the PN's 054A's DO carry some sort of towed array, we're just unsure whether its a sonar or a torpedo decoy. The PN has Aselsan towed torpedo decoy's on the Babur's, so it would make logical sense to have torpedo decoys onboard, on the other hand, the positioning aligns with a potential SLTA array too... What it is, we wont know for sure, but its better than nothing.
Great catch!
Yasser76
Elite Member
play the ball, not the man
Toxic
Trusted Member
You said take your pick, I said there is no choice yet you keep repeating that shit, there is nothing left to play.
Yasser76
Elite Member
Yes, very good point, think IN also realised that some time ago....
Toxic
Trusted Member
"IN realized Saar" It's true that the Indian Carriers are dogshit but that doesn't change the fact that they have brahmos on anything that floats plus pretty potent air defences our chances of sinking them with missiles are pretty low.
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
-
Can Pakistan Win Bangladesh’s Trust Without Apologizing for the Genocide of 1971? (13 Viewers)- Latest: Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ
-
-
-
