Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder Bags Another Fighter Deal, Media Says; India’s LCA Tejas Banks On Massive IAF Contract

Status
Not open for further replies.
Awwad said:
You never answered my questions.

This sore loser compared few stocks of Apple and compared it Ownership LOL! I mean how much further these indians will ridicule themselves and make a joke out of them for denying the simple known fact that PAC is owner of JF-17 project. How much pathetic they will act to deny facts is amusing. I slapped all the international media headlines telling you that whaever whinning you are doing has no meaning as world don't give a shit to your whinning. You can do case at UN maybe to prove your point to the world? Another member slapped all the parts that are built in PAC.

Anyways, here are the questions again:

Did you approached Apple with your concept and your requirements for new product (Iphone) ??

So basically Iphone was your idea ??

and Did you paid apple millions of dollars in R & D of Apple Iphone??

Did you provide engineering, testing, QA teams to apple for Iphone development??

Do you have agreement with Apple that every phone will be rolled out only from your house ??

If you'd have done all of above then by all means you'd be the owner of Iphone product. Really it takes special kind of idiot bakhts to compare stock buying with total Ownership. You need to learn basics. First understand how businesses are done, how deals are made, learn concepts of co-ownership. Don't ever be a fool to compare liscence production of already developed products like SU-30 to country's owned platform like JF-17.

I know it's hard to know the reality. Truth is not easy especially if you are hatred filled bakhts then its simply too difficult for your personality to be able and digest the facts.
Click to expand...
I haven't answered this question of yours, as you have not answered many questions of mine.
If you are able to answer my questions, I will answer all your questions.
Plus I have pegged you for an idiot, that i why stopped answering your questions.
 
Pakistani Show

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Versus Indian Show

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


“If we had the Rafael” - Modi - That is an admission of defeat if any. We attacked you with 50 year old jets and you guys blamed your failures it not not having Rafaels.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Now #uck off!
 
Last edited:
kambhakt said:
Sure. Just don't use PL15 to do the shooting.
Click to expand...
What is there will be used including PL15. This discussion is nonsensical talking about who made what. As long as a nation has access to what it needs for its defences its not going to matter who made it.
 
lightning f57 said:
What is there will be used including PL15. This discussion is nonsensical talking about who made what. As long as a nation has access to what it needs for its defences its not going to matter who made it.
Click to expand...
I agree with the nonsensical part. There is a debate going on another thread of whether PL15 is available for the JF-17. You can use another missile until that is sorted out.
 
jzrmt said:
USA a more reliable source of defense matters?

200w.gif


ajgw17q_460swp.webp


images
Click to expand...
No one said anything about the US being more reliable.

He said EurAsia news is not reliable, and he's right.

They've made a number of claims in the past that have turned out to be completely bogus.

Stop using whataboutisms, it makes you look incredibly weak.
 
Guys: is the Iraqi deal confirmed or is this fake news just lien the Argentina one ? Can someone confirM?
 
Jaeger said:
Yes, absolutely, please do.
Please also list the same for JF 17. As to, how many technologies and compnents are non Pakistani.

Then we can have a fair comparison.
Click to expand...
Oh bhai we have no vast aerospace industries as you claim to be have in your mighty Tejas and we are not assembling JF-17 but we are manufacturing in house, we bought cnc and other manufacturing machines from China to produce at home, we don't claim JF-17 our indigenous jet, only some fan boys thinks that do you know what's the meaning of JF?

1-design and feasibility study done by France

2- fly by wire system develop and tested by Lockheed Martin on F16s Vista in mid 90s (you only improve fly by wire system after 98 nuke test)

3- landing gear developed by Boeing

4-avionic comes from various sources, USA/France/Israeli and some Indian (mission computer), hydrolics system is also comes from USA

5- weapons are also comes from various sources USA/French/Israeli/Russian and some Indian

6- composite technology came also from EU, I mean you get lots of help from EU for building composite aerostructure for your mighty Tejas 😉

So what's YOURS in your out of this universe Tejas 🤔
 
Cryptonian said:
Jf17 lobbed glide bombs like a coward from Pakistani air space and did not enter into Indian territory . Su30 and Even SAMs didnt target it because of orders for de-escalation. Same reason why F-16 didn't engage with mig21 till it entered into Pakistani air space.

Our mirages went inside Pakistan and bombed the hell out of terrorist hideout.
Click to expand...
Lol do your mighty mirage2000 entered Pakistani airspace, go ask your mighty IAF first they said we entered Pakistani airspace and then after a week they said they didn't entered Pakistani airspace

And no need to entered enemy territory, today era stand off munition era launching stand off weapons from outside of enemy 's airspace, we aren't cowards like Indians who attack us at night

Haha your SAMs were failed you shot down your own helicopter in anger that shows your preparation for war 🤣 your MKI have no BVR comparable to our amraam in term of range at the time incident so your raptor of the east can't do anything to our amraam equipped F16s at the time of incident our JF-17 was also equipped better range BVR than your R77 which has range of 80 km and our amraam and SD 10 have a range of 105 and 100 km so you can't do anything about JF-17 and F16s equipped with amraam and SD 10 at the time of incident 😉 😀 🙄 😜
 
White and Green with M/S said:
Oh bhai we have no vast aerospace industries as you claim to be have in your mighty Tejas and we are not assembling JF-17 but we are manufacturing in house, we bought cnc and other manufacturing machines from China to produce at home, we don't claim JF-17 our indigenous jet, only some fan boys thinks that do you know what's the meaning of JF?

1-design and feasibility study done by France

2- fly by wire system develop and tested by Lockheed Martin on F16s Vista in mid 90s (you only improve fly by wire system after 98 nuke test)

3- landing gear developed by Boeing

4-avionic comes from various sources, USA/France/Israeli and some Indian (mission computer), hydrolics system is also comes from USA

5- weapons are also comes from various sources USA/French/Israeli/Russian and some Indian

6- composite technology came also from EU, I mean you get lots of help from EU for building composite aerostructure for your mighty Tejas 😉

So what's YOURS in your out of this universe Tejas 🤔
Click to expand...
Good.

I do know the meaning for JF.

But do you know it was Russian Mikoyan and not PAC Kamra, which provided significant Design support for JF 17 project under Mig 33 designation.

Mikoyan joins Chengdu on fighter - 6/21/1995 - Flight Global

Article
web.archive.org web.archive.org
 
Jaeger said:
Good.

I do know the meaning for JF.

But do you know it was Russian Mikoyan and not PAC Kamra, which provided significant Design support for JF 17 project under Mig 33 designation.

Mikoyan joins Chengdu on fighter - 6/21/1995 - Flight Global

Article
web.archive.org web.archive.org
Click to expand...
Yes I know that, mikoyan did helped China to design JF-17, it's a first fully indigenous project by China so what's problem if Russia help China to design JF-17, that is similar to your Tejas, design and had a feasibility study by French for you in late 80s
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top