Pakistan's New Provinces Plan ?

[PaklovesTurkiye]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[El Sidd]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

What does Chaudary in his name suggest? This Punjabi supremacist thrives on ethnic and sectarian divisions.

 

[ACE OF HEARTS]

The 32-33-34 economic zone model should be out in the open now.

The debate should shift from whether new provinces / divisions / economic zones are needed, to whether the new boundaries are acceptable or not.

And

Whether the new administrative zones created will be self sufficient or not ?

Similarly, the true NFC formula should be discussed in public so that awaremess and consensus is created quickly.

Paramilitary forces and other security appratus should be deployed all over sindh province, in case, of any mischievous event.

The hammer must fall now before media is bought by the corrupts entirely.

 

[maxpane]

Karachi division under federal government? PPP would have a collective heart attack.

their cm starts wearing sindhi topi you can get the idea what their mind

 

[FuturePAF]

Let me try to explain it again.

1. Provinces do NOT distribute resources, they hoard them​

You claim: “New provinces will distribute resources more evenly.”

The reality: Provinces are political monopolies, not development engines. They hoard:

• budgets
• land authority
• taxation power
• policing
• hiring
• industrial approvals

Creating more provinces simply creates more monopolies.

You don’t fix resource hoarding by multiplying the hoarders.

Economic Zones (My EZ model) solve this by distributing resources based on:

• logistics
• export potential
• industrial corridors
• population clusters
• infrastructure grids

Zones distribute based on data, not politics.

2. Provinces do NOT create meritocracy, they create more patronage seats​

You claim: “New provinces will incentivize administrators to rise on merit.”

The reality: Every new province creates:

• a new chief minister
• a new cabinet
• a new assembly
• dozens of new ministries
• thousands of patronage jobs

This is not meritocracy. This is expanding the political job market.

Meritocracy comes from performance‑based zone administration (My EZ Model), where:

• promotions depend on export growth
• budgets depend on industrial output
• administrators are evaluated on KPIs, not political loyalty

Zones reward competence. Provinces reward connections.

3. Provinces do NOT provide oversight; they are the reason oversight fails​

You claim: “Economic zones need provincial oversight.”

The reality: Provinces are the single biggest obstacle to industrial growth. They politicize:

• land acquisition
• taxation
• subsidies
• industrial permits
• energy allocation
• policing
• environmental approvals

This is why zones fail today; they are trapped under provincial veto power.

Zones only work when they are freed from provincial interference and governed by:

• technical administrators
• export boards
• logistics planners
• industrial regulators

Oversight must be professional, not political.

4. More provinces = more overhead, more bureaucracy, more waste​

You claim: “New provinces will reduce concentration of power.”

The reality: More provinces = more overhead:

• more assemblies
• more ministries
• more secretariats
• more departments
• more budgets
• more protocol
• more political fragmentation

You don’t reduce elite concentration by creating more elites.

Removing provinces eliminates:

• 4 chief ministers
• 4 cabinets
• 4 assemblies
• 4 planning commissions
• 4 revenue boards
• 4 land authorities
• 4 bureaucratic empires

This is how you shrink overhead, not by multiplying it.

5. Economic Zones outperform provinces because they are built around growth, not politics​

Provinces are political units. Economic Zones (My EZ Model) are production units.

Zones are designed around:

• railways
• highways
• ports
• industrial corridors
• energy grids
• export clusters

Provinces are designed around:

• ethnic boundaries
• political constituencies
• patronage networks
• bureaucratic empires

One builds economies. The other builds politics.

6. The core structural truth: Pakistan’s problem is not the number of provinces, it is the existence of provinces​

Provinces are the bottleneck, not the solution.

They:

• duplicate governance
• centralize power
• block reforms
• politicize development
• weaken districts
• suffocate economic zones

Removing provinces is not radical, it is structural surgery.

Replacing them with 34 Economic Zones:

• eliminates duplication
• decentralizes power
• aligns governance with logistics
• creates meritocratic promotion pathways
• unlocks industrial growth
• reduces political fragmentation
• cuts bureaucratic overhead
• maximizes exports

This is how modern states grow.

More provinces multiply the disease.
Economic Zones remove the disease.

Removing provinces and shifting to 34 Economic Zones reduces administrative waste by $22 billion dollars annually, and each zone operates as a targeted economic cluster optimized for logistics and industrial expansion. Choice is clear, adopt new modern governance system, or keep begging for 3 billion dollars.

Obviously, we need a better governance system. And if what you say is true, and there is no hope of reform, we should just abolish provinces all together and go the economic zone method you talk about.

 

[Pakistanithinktank]

Obviously, we need a better governance system. And if what you say is true, and there is no hope of reform, we should just abolish provinces all together and go the economic zone method you talk about.

The 34‑Zone Model dissolves Pakistan’s traditional cultural, ethnic, and provincial biases by replacing identity‑based provinces with function‑based economic zones. Governance shifts from human discretion to digital, rule‑driven systems, eliminating favoritism, sifarish, and provincial gatekeeping. Autonomous Zone Authorities deliver uniform digital services to every citizen, regardless of language or ethnicity, while cross‑zone economic interdependence breaks old “Sindh vs Punjab” narratives. Political incentives move from identity politics to performance, exports, and productivity, creating a governance system where everyone is treated equally.

 

[FuturePAF]

The 34‑Zone Model dissolves Pakistan’s traditional cultural, ethnic, and provincial biases by replacing identity‑based provinces with function‑based economic zones. Governance shifts from human discretion to digital, rule‑driven systems, eliminating favoritism, sifarish, and provincial gatekeeping. Autonomous Zone Authorities deliver uniform digital services to every citizen, regardless of language or ethnicity, while cross‑zone economic interdependence breaks old “Sindh vs Punjab” narratives. Political incentives move from identity politics to performance, exports, and productivity, creating a governance system where everyone is treated equally.

What I fear with this model is the lack of oversight, allowing industrialists to run amok and wreck areas, all for short term gain and long term national damage. One example would one industrialist taking more water then allocated and creating a national political problem. This is why a non-corrupt political layer of oversight is needed to prevent disputes between regions.

That layer can all sit in Islamabad, as long as it’s effective, but has to one the people trust to resolve their disputes.