POST WAR assessment of recent conflict.

[Puncher]

China is different from Russia and the United States. China's war doctrine does not aim at occupying land, but at killing and maiming its opponents' field forces and destroying their economic and industrial strength. China also never fights security wars and usually withdraws quickly to end the war at home after achieving its objectives.

If China were to launch an attack, it would choose to reinforce and resupply the 54th Heavy Armored Composite Brigade stationed at Aksai Chin from the Karakoram Highway. Then launch a surprise attack from behind the Indian army attacking Pakistan and at the same time launch a surprise attack towards New Delhi. After destroying most of the Indian forces and destroying the entire industry, economy, infrastructure in the vicinity of New Delhi and dealing a serious blow to the confidence and reputation of the Indian central government, we would immediately withdraw to Aksai Chin and allow the Pakistani army to take over the Indo-Controlled Kashmir. There is nothing for the US to capitalize on.

If India is still unwilling to accept defeat, we can also keep bombing valuable targets in India until the Indian central government gives in. Or support local Indian forces for independent statehood.

Have you guys developed some supper technology to intercept icbm flying towards Beijing or Shanghai?? Just a curious question

 

[MH.Yang]

Have you guys developed some supper technology to intercept icbm flying towards Beijing or Shanghai?? Just a curious question

The straight-line distance from India to Beijing and Shanghai is about 4,000km, and you have to fly over the vast uninhabited Tibet. China has enough time and depth to intercept missiles attacking Beijing and Shanghai. If India wants to shoot at wild rabbits in the neighboring Tibetan no-man's land, then we will not intercept them.

 

[Puncher]

The straight-line distance from India to Beijing and Shanghai is about 4,000km, and you have to fly over the vast uninhabited Tibet. China has enough time and depth to intercept missiles attacking Beijing and Shanghai. If India wants to shoot at wild rabbits in the neighboring Tibetan no-man's land, then we will not intercept them.

I am not saying anything or hinting at anything. Just that you said that China will bomb delhi, hence thought of checking if you have some tech to protect your major cities or just high.. that's it. Pls don't mind

 

[MH.Yang]

I am not saying anything or hinting at anything. Just that you said that China will bomb delhi, hence thought of checking if you have some tech to protect your major cities or just high.. that's it. Pls don't mind

You may not know China. China has always been a country willing to pay a big price for long-term interests. For example, the Chinese government would have initiated an attack while American troops were still in Korea, and the Chinese government would have initiated an attack on the Soviet-controlled Heixiazi Island.

Life is precious to the Chinese, and behind it is the happiness of a family. But life is also cheap, and without the shelter of a strong country and civilization, these lives will be as fragile as the Palestinians who died under the Israeli massacre. Life is like a coin, which we would not hesitate to use to buy the continuity of our civilization and its power and wealth, but which we would cherish and not pay for unnecessary expenses.

If India threatens China's long-term interests. Then even if Beijing and Shanghai will be destroyed, we will definitely take the initiative. Just look at the history of the few times we have waged war.

 

[Vox Non Dei]

Screenshot is released. Now all depend on India good behavior. More videos are coming.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

What is this? Thats supposed to be some image?

 

[Vox Non Dei]

BS. Modi didn’t give 2 shits about precision.

Modi does not take those decisions. This is not Command and Conquer. Modi gives objectives; tactics, military choices and weapons are decided by the forces themselves.

Modi is not qualified enough to understand all those details. Actually, besides managing elections and posing for photos, he is not qualified enough for anything else.

knowing how much Indians lie and is now is in the fabric of their DNA we should simply discard anything coming from Indian sources...no matter how authentic it may look unless verified by the third party.

Absolutely!
All those videos are coming from Indians only and have not been verified by anyone. So they should be discarded.

 

[Guynextdoor]

Here it is- first official reaction of France

There is fog of war- there is a war of misinformation
We don't know what happened. We have no information
We are studying the situatiom

It's as simple as that. But sure some poster (like @TopGun786 ) will now pull teeth to make it look like he said 20 Rafale went down.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Han Patriot]

Have you guys developed some supper technology to intercept icbm flying towards Beijing or Shanghai?? Just a curious question

You do realise we have ICBMs decades before India had a Prithvi right? LOLOL

 

[Han Patriot]

Here it is- first official reaction of France

There is fog of war- there is a war of misinformation
We don't know what happened. We have no information
We are studying the situatiom

It's as simple as that. But sure some poster (like @TopGun786 ) will now pull teeth to make it look like he said 20 Rafale went down.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Your AF Marshall when asked about any Rafales lost answered that in battle, losses are common. LOLOLOL.

I heard India is denying the French for inventory check,

 

[Han Patriot]

Go back to bharat rakshak… it was 6+.. and what are you expecting videos of burnt bodies….

Dude, at least they are acknowledging 2. Officially India is still tight lipped until now on losses. Imagine the shock of 5 planes killed by PL15

 

[fitpOsitive]

So how many AEW&C Pakistan lost? India claims two Saab 2000.

 

[Puncher]

You do realise we have ICBMs decades before India had a Prithvi right? LOLOL

what does that mean ? LOLOLO

 

[Sharma Ji]

I heard India is denying the French for inventory check,

Heard from whom exactly ?

 

[Ali_Baba]

So how many AEW&C Pakistan lost? India claims two Saab 2000.

Are you seriously asking this? Discussed and dismissed to death as fake news already multiple times now.

 

[Goenitz]

India is after 3 objectives: Azad Kashmir, Gunfire attacks and IWT.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The Indian army realised that they could penetrate Pak air defence system in Mian Chunnu attack, and it exploited that this time. For sure, it couldn't stop Pak response, but unlike India's, Pak missiles didn't hit their targets effectively (due to non-photographic evidence).
What India really wants is to negotiate IWT for more favourable conditions.
Pak may realise that it has AD gaps or strike gaps, so it would procure accordingly (budget issues). Pak has to defend PAF facilities, or any edge gained in surveillance, EW, and the upcoming J35 will be redundant.