r3alist
Elite Member
Zia was on scriptIf only he goes against the colonial agenda which zia mistakenly did and the duffer Munira has no intention of doing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zia was on scriptIf only he goes against the colonial agenda which zia mistakenly did and the duffer Munira has no intention of doing.
You mean 1971 you mean 1998 kargil. You mean stealing elections.I don't have much confidence in the politicans and majority of the issues are because of their incompetence.
The army can't afford to wait for the squabbling politicans to reach a consensus. If it wasn't for the army Pakistan would have been as dysfunctional as a south american country.
We are heading into uncertain times. They should redirect the entire budget to the army so they can make ICBM, nuclear submarines and launch their own sattelites.
I agree with her perspective on Afghanistan. To add to this, Nehru and Lord Mountbatten allowed the creation of Pakistan with the idea that it would act as a buffer state between Afghanistan and India. Historically, Indian policymakers were well aware of the challenges posed by Afghanistan. During the British occupation of India, Afghan raiders frequently caused trouble, and the region was difficult to control. Allowing Pakistan’s creation was seen as a strategic solution to these historical issues.
However, this strategy did not work in their favor, and in the last three years, the current incompetent army chief has disastrously shifted Pakistan’s foreign policy. Instead of maintaining Afghanistan as a neutral or cooperative neighbor, he has turned it into an enemy. This is a grave mistake. Historically, Pakistan has always considered India its primary adversary, but suddenly redirecting hostility towards Afghanistan is shortsighted and dangerous.
If we look at history, Afghanistan has always been the “graveyard of empires.” By antagonizing Afghanistan, this foolish leadership is further destabilizing Pakistan. One has to wonder—are they deliberately trying to destroy Pakistan?
But can anyone do something or even wants to do something?Oh, absolutely, he’s very cunning—cunning enough to kill his own people right in front of Parliament and the Supreme Court while the whole world watched. Cunning enough to single-handedly destroy the army’s reputation among the people of Pakistan, something no external enemy could have achieved so effectively. And yes, so “cunning” that he uses intelligence resources not for strategic gains or protecting the country, but to spy on people’s private lives and make bedroom videos—what a shining example of brilliance!
His so-called “cunning” is nothing more than blatant incompetence wrapped in arrogance. A leader who thinks this kind of absurd manipulation counts as strategy is only proving how unfit and ridiculous he truly is. If this is their idea of cunning leadership, no wonder Pakistan finds itself in such a mess. It’s a comedy of errors, led by someone whose stupidity is rivaled only by his inflated ego.
No - it’s more a case of cunning in playing what he knows. This is an entire OTS cabal that has made it to the top - they know moves within the political spectrum based on their understanding of what works and doesn’t work. They are rightly so completely inept when it comes to foreign policy and strategic affairs which is what Ayesha Siddiqua is alluding to.
Its a simple case of experience - the current leader is experienced in traditional political manipulation via his time in the agency with very little to show for in external relations or intelligence gathering beyond borders - leave aside any aspect of analysis.
You mean 1971 you mean 1998 kargil. You mean stealing elections.
If the current establishment side steps from the current policy they’ll have to deal with a Pashton nationalism, extremism and a host of other issues. It doesn’t look like there is a policy u-turn as yet. Ayesha Siddiqui said the establishment is engaging the ex NA. If that’s the case then that’s very disturbing and a duffer move.
You are right.Besides making an enemy out of your second largest ethnicity, the tajiks even after using Pakistani leverage to claw themselves back in power may not reciprocate. Their elders had known people, worked and trained in Pakistan while current crop has only resentment towards Pakistan.
For a step forward prepare to take two back.
Not quite, especially towards the end. Defied them on nuclear issue, then on how the Afghan jihad was to be concluded, all of which was undone as the real CIA asset Benazir came on the scene...Zia was on script
PPP has been duffers' A team going back to the days when Bhutto literally sat on Ayub's lap and called him daddy.A senior member of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) was summoned to an important office and was verbally reprimanded over the protests being staged in Sindh regarding the canal excavation issue in Punjab.
He responded by saying, “Sir, you can excavate the canals, but please let us continue protesting, or else our vote bank will decrease.”
This means the PPP is actually on board with the canal excavation, and the protests in Sindh are merely a tactic to promote provincialism and protect their vote bank.
In reality, Bilawal, his father, and the entire party are on the same page and secretly support the canal excavation project.
Bajwa put Pakistan directly in Indian orbit. Duffers are now collaborating with Indian lobbyist in DC to counter PTI/IK. This is on form as they've been operating under hindutva masters' ORBAT ever since Bajwa lamented on not having enough diesel for his tanks to fight India.Some of you folks get too emotional.
Take a broader perspective of things. South Asia has seen alot of changes lately. Bangladesh has de-orbited from India’s sphere of influence. Afghanistan has taken over by Taliban. Pakistan is effectively under martial law. India is doing its best to lose its secular credentials and exploring Hindutva ideology.
Pakistan’s Afghan policy has been a net positive. NATO is out from Afghanistan along with Indian consulates. The border has been fenced and is doing its part. The negatives are the TTP is still a major pain and actions against the TTP and remnants has not been effective enough.
The situation at the moment is not all doom and gloom. The establishment needs to keep engaging these cucks, no matter how much one hates them. And all options need to be on table.
Then you’ve got the vested interests within the ISI who’re still high on a unified Central Asian republic or using them the Afghans as your proxy as some sort of an entitlement. In addition, there are corrupt elements within the establishment who are knee deep into oil smuggling and smuggling of other goods. These have to be done away with.
If the current establishment side steps from the current policy they’ll have to deal with a Pashton nationalism, extremism and a host of other issues. It doesn’t look like there is a policy u-turn as yet. Ayesha Siddiqui said the establishment is engaging the ex NA. If that’s the case then that’s very disturbing and a duffer move.
Why do you have to pick one? They are all corrupt and highly incompetent. I’m not a fan of IK but his rule started to make Pakistan a nation state and unified a nation out of a growing middle class. If you fools have any idea on how modern nation states are built, but you’re too busy stuck in the 1800s with on one feudal lord making all the decisions and blocking organic growth.You sound like an Indian. I trust the army more than any of these politicans.
They encapsulate the true meaning of Pakistani identity and ideology.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.