Distant_Observer
Trusted Member
Here is another L from IK. Just far too much of a pacifist for his own good. He just doesn't get it does he.
PTI News, Updates and Discussion
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
- Status
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
Why does it even matter? Fauj essentially runs the entire security apparatus of this country (along with everything else). Going great so far. Half the country is lost already. The rest is debt ridden disaster of governance. But hey, let’s find a scapegoat (Imran Khan) and blame every security problem on him. It’s much more convenient this way to hide the real troublemakers.
Pak-Warrior
Registered Member
Just imagine the overloaded cheapness of N followers. They have imprisoned a person without any charge for years now and still instead of asking their own puppet govt or establishment for accountability on worst security situation since IK's departure and worst economic situation they still need a scapegoat in prison.
As if he is running the country for last 3 years. That's some serious lameness.
Hakikat ve Hikmet
VIP Member
IK has lost his brains and ball$....
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
Pak-Warrior
Registered Member
Some pakistanis may say BS to a jailed national leader as they have obsession with him and they have turned into a cult that's anti of him. But still they are Pakistanis.
Secondly, you seems interested about his balls. Every single one of them make deals and get out. Look at those coward shareefs, cried, ask for forgiveness and whisked away twice. Once in Musharraf tenure, Second time by Gen Bajwa, a convicted criminal was sent abroad. You should be able to feel where there was a lack of set.
It doesn't matter if bunch of cowards in a forum say crap to him. IMO, he has tons of issues too, he is far from perfect but he is the leader of majority of Pakistanis. If free elections to happen tomorrow, its no brainer that who will win. So cope with it.
I personally feel satisfied seeing people here burning with popularity of a jailed leader. History will forget most tom and dick in Pak's politics but he won't go anywhere. He's done his job, by not bending the knee he has reached another level where no current politicians could dream reaching.
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
IK is has a very simple strategy and a simple message, that appeals to many in most of the country, especially Pashtun (and Baluch) majority areas; safety and dignity. This insistence has earned him fierce loyalty, which many can’t articulate in words (my analysis, not my personal affiliation speaking; although I acknowledge a useful figure when I see one).
IMHO, the solution to Afghanistan is economic interdependence. My examples are Japan after WW2 (interdependence on the US), Switzerland after the Napoleonic wars, and especially Saudi Arabia after the discovery of oil in 1938.
With the aim to renew CPEC, and the recently agreed upon Saudi-Pak defense agreement, the key now has to be FDI into KPK and Baluchistan into labor intensive mining. The investment in border areas will also allow the funding of better roads in the area, and allow state security forces/law enforcement better means of access to more remote parts of the border areas.
The prosperity will incentivize the Afghan to seek similar investment, by large potential investor like the Saudis, into Afghanistan. Saudis being able to spend their oil wealth in patronage politics helped secure the Saud family’s rule and the national unity. This could equally appeal to the Talibs and Afghan unity.
Where IK comes in: The Afghans also have many social issues, cross border marriages, even accepting the fact there is a border, and TTP militants (miscreant smugglers) operating against Pakistan. While IK may want to try a soft approach, Pakistanis know acknowledge this is a festering wound; and unresolved conflict that needs a political solution. With the advice and approval of Gen. Tariq Khan, who fought the TTP and is from the erstwhile FATA himself, IMHO, Pakistan could implement an agreement with the Afghans, overseen by IK as a one term President, (as we also need a reform to politics from figures to platforms), to exile all TTP and their families to Afghanistan, accept KPK is administered from Peshawar, a secure Trans-Afghan railway as well as other issues of interest to Pakistan, in exchange for recognition, and facilitating FDI into Afghanistan.
IK as President would allow him the dignity to return, as a national figure, but not jeopardize our reproachmont with Saudi Arabia. As President he would have to give his ascent, but another PTI leader could be the PM and work with a team of experts on a carefully crafted and balanced foreign policy. IK would be most useful in domestic politics, reproachment with the Afghans, and rebuilding trust in the state, so that even modest increases in social spending (from the mining profit) will go a long way, practically and in the perception of the public.
We can’t afford to waste a leader like IK. We have to value people who hold credibility within their ethnic background, but fiercely uphold Pakistani law, try to challenging the system within the rules, and can be the change agent that can shift the culture.
So in summary, where trade does not go, an army follows. We need to create a symbiotic relationship with Afghanistan, as well as Pashtun culture in general to Pakistan the state, in an understanding that can endure. We need to leverage our political figures as well as our diplomatic relations to secure this border and turn from a border that needs defending to a new place that will be a catalyst for our economic growth and gestation importance, especially in a way that heals internal divisions and restores the trust in democracy, rule of law, civilian supremacy, and checks on the power of the military, as well as civilians (IK will also have to drop his anti-corruption rallies and focus on governance or allowing his government to focus on governance, which would also allow the other parties time to reset with a new generation of leadership and new ideas).
As for the need the use force. IK is right and wrong; we need force, but it needs the legitimacy of provincial legal norms. We need to fold the FC into a revamped KPK police force, and give them the means to deal with armed force up to and including the TTP, but in a way that will limit the risk of civilians being killed; heavier use of FPV drones to scout ahead; and using troops in MRAPs and attack helicopters to sweep for militants, employing deadly force when absolutely certain the threat cannot be dealt another way, and civilians won’t be harmed. Capturing known militants, not causing death, will also limit the tendency for a cycle of vengeance, per the culture, and being by put on trial in an open KPK court will prevent a repeat of some of the mistakes that antagonized the public across the border (the tactics of the zero units).
With the return of IK, and renewed public trust in the rule of law, the KPK police could kill or capture militants, and those caught alive could be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, to be made an example of, while not facing the anger of the public, as everything was done in an acceptable manner. We have to acknowledge IK’s usefulness (and the limitations of the his usefulness) and craft a strategy accordingly. It’s not about liking the man or not. It’s about what serves the interests of the nation (people) and the state.
Last edited:
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
Imran Khan can foresee things long before they have actually occurred. He is an old student of history and politics after all…
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
He acknowledges cultural red lines; he wants to pre-empt the cycle of violence that distracts the state from its job of governance and improving people’s lives.
The value of politicians, genuinely elected by the public, is to be a go between, a bridge, between the nation’s oligarchy class, whomever they are, and the general public. The establishment needs IK, not for when things are going well, but for when things go down hill, which happens soon enough. Stability in Pakistan is just a pause until the next crisis.
Last edited:
HAIDER
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
I still failed to understand the mindset of Pak army Generals..what they are doing since 1947. Are they really sincere with Pakistan . Or they are One Window operation for Western powers.
Last edited:
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Amongst the elite or those aspiring to become the elite: Absentee Landlords; earning a living on property inherited or put in a position to manage. Earn what they can, how ever they can, while they are in charge.
Amongst the middle classes, it seems a harsh competition, with limited quarter, even inside families.
Amongst the poor, survival, plain and simple.
If sincerity is to come it has to come from the amongst the elite, to share their privilege with the middle and lower classes. Noblesse oblige. To whom much is given, much is required.
Last edited:
HAIDER
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Sorry, my question was in perspective of Pak army role since 1947.
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
To be the Samurai like class/caste (during the Shogun period) of Pakistan.
Side note, I know I reference a lot of historical examples, but in a way I think Pakistan at the level of political development, is similar to many countries, but hundreds of years ago.
Last edited:
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
-
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds (408 Viewers)
- Latest: BananaRepublic
-
-
-