PTI News, Updates and Discussion

Do you think PTI has a future without Imran Khan?

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 19.6%
  • No

    Votes: 80 71.4%
  • Only if senior leadership is released

    Votes: 10 8.9%

  • Total voters
    112
Status
Not open for further replies.
Taking so much time to think of an answer 🤣. He must be grinding his teeth sitting in frustration while we can see he is here on thread

Wow you are such a good keyboard warrior, I hope your boss gives a pay rise for the night shift you are doing with the other guy.
 

Why there is little incentive for Imran to let KP cooperate with Centre

Rough ride ahead?

Arifa Noor
October 14, 2025

THE political crisis in KP doesn’t seem to be headed for a quick resolution. And perhaps, Imran Khan is aware of this as is the ‘other side’.

The decision to change the chief minister did not come out of the blue. It had been evident for some time that the PTI and Khan were growing disillusioned with Ali Amin Gandapur. And the reasons were many — his ‘failure’ to get any concessions for Khan; allegations of corruption and misgovernance; and unhappiness of the party (leadership as well as workers) with him. The rumours about what he was getting wrong kept growing.

That Khan was aware of this was obvious. More than once he had sent messages for Gandapur to visit him, to discuss governance matters, such as the budget or increasing terrorism within the province. But for some time now, the chief minister had been a no-show at Adiala. He wasn’t getting the permission was the reply from Peshawar.

But it seems that matters came to a head at the recent jalsa in Peshawar. It was a lacklustre affair by some accounts, lending credence to reports of the growing unpopularity of the party in the province and the disillusionment of the workers with the provincial government.

Social media footage of participants expressing their anger when Gandapur took to the stage was widely shared. The incident rattled Gandapur who hot-footed it to Adiala, where the doors opened smoothly for him. That he left as abruptly as he had turned up confirmed the rumours that his visit had not gone well. Gandapur left it to Barrister Saif to tell the press how he was still Khan’s blue-eyed boy, though his blistering attack on Aleema Khan later told a different story.

When the announcement came from Adiala about the change of guard, however, the focus was on the growing militancy and the chief minister’s inability to separate his government from the centre’s policy. That this may not be the entire story is also possible. The trial in jail of Khan in the case called Toshakhana 2 continues at breakneck speed and there are few doubts which way it is headed.

There are very little chances of relief from the higher courts. It is assumed that after all the convictions have been secured, access to him will become even more limited. In these circumstances, there is little incentive for Khan to let KP cooperate with the centre, especially as the PTI’s rank and file is also unhappy. It could be a case of using one arrow for two targets.

If the new CM chooses the path of resistance it will further complicate KP’s security situation.

But more than Gandapur’s ‘sacking’, it was the nomination of his successor that upped the temperatures. The party in KP welcomed Sohail Afridi but the rest of the political system reacted differently. The information minister at the centre did a press talk condemning the decision, adding that it would not be allowed. Others from the ruling party gave similar statements, as hushed whispers of governor’s rule or a splintering of the PTI in KP did the rounds. Overnight, the nominee was accused of being an associate of Murad Saeed (one of the few PTI stalwarts still on the run), a Taliban sympathiser, involved in smuggling or worse. The least of his sins and perhaps the only relevant one was his lack of experience. But the criticism against him grew more ludicrous.

The governor continued to throw up legal herrings from not having received the resignation to expressing fears about the authenticity of Gandapur’s signatures. For good measure, he also went and met Maulana Fazl; that they probably did a high five over their local rival’s exit is an image one can only conjure up mentally. The official images were serious and without any outcome.

All of this was also seen in conjunction with the press conference by the DG ISPR in Peshawar. While the talk was about the security situation, politics crept in. It seemed to some that it was aimed at the PTI and its governance in the province and how that was linked to the deteriorating security situation. In this environment, it’s hard to raise questions about the need for such press conferences so let’s just move on to politics.

By Monday morning, the election for the new chief minister went ahead far more smoothly than expected. The opposition boycotted the exercise; the number of votes cast for the new chief minister showed the PTI remained intact in the provincial assembly. But none of this indicates a smooth ride from hereon.

As mentioned, Khan, and by extension the PTI, has little incentive to allow smooth cooperation with the centre; this provides no relief to the PTI people behind bars and neither does it help with the growing discontent among KP residents vis-à-vis militancy and military operations.

On the other hand, the establishment is also in a bind. It has not been able to dent Khan’s popularity, especially in KP. But more importantly, it seems for the second time, it has toyed with and abandoned the idea of installing a non-PTI chief minister (for now). This is not simply because of the numbers game; it is more due to the concern over the reaction there.

Unlike Balochistan, the powers that be still worry about the people’s sentiment in KP. While the former can be given a completely puppet government with no legitimate voice, there is less willingness to be this indifferent to public sentiment in KP. This was probably at play in 2024 and might just have been at play in recent days.

But if the new chief minister follows a path of resistance, as he is expected to, it will make the security situation in KP complicated. And if he goes the way of Gandapur, the PTI and Khan will be under pressure again to stir things up. Indeed, short of rapprochement between Khan and the centre, the multiple crises in KP will not witness any change for the better. The province, and by extension the rest of the country, is in for a rough ride.

The writer is a journalist.

Published in Dawn, October 14th, 2025
 

PHC directs KP Governor Kundi to administer oath to CM-elect Sohail Afridi by 4pm tomorrow


Abdul Hakeem
October 14, 2025

The Peshawar High Court (PHC) directed Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi on Tuesday to administer the oath to Chief Minister-elect Sohail Afridi tomorrow by 4pm.

PHC Chief Justice (CJ) S.M. Attique Shah issued the directive, further instructing that KP Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati should administer the oath if the governor did not.

The court’s decision, which was reserved earlier today, came on a PTI application seeking the nomination of the assembly speaker or any other person “considered appropriate” in place of the governor to administer the oath to Afridi.
 
Afridi’s election on Monday was held amid uncertainty about the status of Ali Amin Gandapur’s resignation from the provincial chief executive’s position. The two resignations submitted to KP Governor Kundi by Gandapur — who is also from the PTI and stepped down on party founder Imran Khan’s directive — have been returned over “disparate signatures”.

But, the PTI maintains that a CM’s resignation does not require the governor’s approval under the Constitution. With this contention, the party elected Afridi in a session boycotted by the opposition.

The same day, in a pre-emptive move, the PTI approached the PHC with the request to nominate KP Assembly Speaker Swati or any other person deemed appropriate in place of Governor Kundi to administer the oath to Afridi.

The court had then directed Additional Attorney General (AAG) Sanaullah to confirm whether the KP governor had received the summary related to Afridi’s oath-taking from the assembly secretariat and submit a reply today.

He informed the court today that the governor was out of city. He said the governor had told him that his flight to Peshawar was scheduled for tomorrow. “He said he does not have a private plane […] and the provincial government could send him helicopter to arrive in the city today.”

Moreover, the advocate general requested the court to nominate a person to swear Afridi in and ensure that the oath-taking took place today.

Counsel for the PTI Salman Akram Raja and the KP governor’s lawyer, Amir Javed, also presented their arguments.
 
PHC Chief Justice (CJ) S.M. Attique Shah, who was presiding over the proceedings, observed that Article 255 of the Constitution, which deals with the subject of oath of office, had been amended to address issues as the one presently under consideration.

For his part, Kundi’s counsel Javed informed the court that he spoke to his client multiple times over the phone yesterday. The lawyer told the court that the governor stated that he would decide on Gandapur’s resignation if legal conditionalities were met.

The CJ then enquired whether the opposition parties had not participated in the election. He observed that the opposition had boycotted the election at the last minute.

Lawyer Javed requested the court to wait until 3pm tomorrow on the matter.

At that, the PHC CJ observed that under Article 255, a CM’s resignation did not require any approval.

Then, addressing Javed, he asked: “Can you guarantee that the governor will be present tomorrow and administer the oath?”

He went on to observe that the governor had raised objections over Gandapur’s signatures on his two resignation letters. “[Even though], Ali Amin Gandapur confirmed on the assembly floor that he had resigned.”

Arguing further on this, Javed cited multiple provisions from the Constitution.

He said “everything is clear” in Article 130(7), which states: “The chief minister shall hold office during the pleasure of the governor, but the governor shall not exercise his powers under this clause unless he is satisfied that the chief minister does not command the confidence of the majority of the members of the provincial assembly, in which case he shall summon the provincial assembly and require the chief minister to obtain a vote of confidence from the assembly.”
 
The governor’s powers were also made clear in Article 48 (president to act on advice, etc.).

He assured the court that the governor would make a decision tomorrow in accordance with the Constitution.

At that, the CJ asked, “Who is running the province at the moment?”

He also enquired whether the election schedule for the CM’s post had been challenged.

Saturday and Sunday were off days for the court, which was why the schedule wasn’t challenged, lawyer Javed replied.

Eventually, the court reserved its decision on the matter and later ruled that the KP governor should administer the oath to Afridi by 4pm tomorrow.

Earlier today, JUI-F leader Maulana Lutfur Rehman also filed a petition in the PHC, requesting that the election of Afridi as the KP chief minister be “set aside” and declared null and void.

Rehman was one of the four people in the race for the KP CM office, along with Sardar Shah Jehan Yousaf of the PML-N, and Arbab Zarak Khan of the PPP and PTI’s Sohail Afridi.

In a petition filed today, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, Rehman named six respondents, including the KP government, KP Governor Faisal Karim Kundi, the KP Assembly through its Speaker Babar Saleem Swati, the secretary of the provincial assembly, outgoing KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur, and CM-elect Sohail Afridi.

In his petition, he requested the court to set aside the election and declare it “ab initio void” as the it was “wholly unlawful, arbitrary, capricious, mala fide, without jurisdiction, coram non judice.”

Rehman questioned how an election could be held if Gandapur’s resignation had not yet been accepted. Citing Article 130(8) of the Constitution, he stressed that elections for the post can not be held unless it was vacant.

Article 130(8) states that “the Chief Minister may, by writing under his hand addressed to the governor, resign his office”, and is the same clause that the PTI has been citing to contend that the CM’s resignation does not require the governor’s acceptance or approval.

Rehman’s petition further asked the court to declare decisions taken by the assembly and the speaker with regard to the CM appointment as “without lawful authority, void, and of no legal effect.”
 
From resignation to election
The barely two-year-old KP Assembly presently seems to be facing a constitutional crisis, which originates from incarcerated PTI founder Imran Khan’s decision on October 8 to change the command at the helm in the province.


In line with his directive, Gandapur resigned from his role the same day while the party’s general secretary, Salman Akram Raja, confirmed that the party had picked Sohail Afridi as his potential replacement.

The resignation letter, shared by Gandapur on X, was typed on his official letterhead and signed at the bottom. However, this initial resignation letter had apparently gotten lost in red tape, with the Governor’s House initially denying ever receiving it.

But, a copy of the letter seen by Dawn showed that it was received by the governor’s staff.

Subsequently, Gandapur sent another handwritten resignation to the governor, which was acknowledged by Kundi on Oct 11. He said in a post on X that the Governor House had received a handwritten resignation letter from Gandapur. “After thorough scrutiny and legal formalities as per the constitution [and] relevant laws, subject resignation will be processed in due course of time,” he added.

Late at night the next day, Governor Kundi returned the two letters submitted by Gandapur over “disparate signatures” and summoned him on October 15 (tomorrow) to settle the matter.

For his part, Gandapur responded to Kundi’s post on X, stating: “Finally, the resignation submitted on October 8, previously denied by the Governor Office, also acknowledged.”

He further said that both resignations submitted by him bore his “authentic signatures”.

By that time, KP Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati had already convened an assembly session to elect a new leader of the house. And the PTI maintained that under Article 130(8) of the Constitution, a chief minister’s resignation did not require the governor’s acceptance or approval.

The opposition, however, disagreed and walked out of the session held for the CM election yesterday. Following its boycott, candidates fielded by the JUI-F, the PPP and the PML-N recieved zero votes while Afridi won the race with 90.
 
By that time, KP Assembly Speaker Babar Saleem Swati had already convened an assembly session to elect a new leader of the house. And the PTI maintained that under Article 130(8) of the Constitution, a chief minister’s resignation did not require the governor’s acceptance or approval.

The opposition, however, disagreed and walked out of the session held for the CM election yesterday. Following its boycott, candidates fielded by the JUI-F, the PPP and the PML-N recieved zero votes while Afridi won the race with 90.
Interesting interpretation of the law by both sides:
Article 130(8) states "The Chief Minister may, by writing under his hand addressed to the Governor, resign his office." I think mere submission would render resignation effective. Question is, does the Governor have the right to reject it? As the constitution stands right now, at least, I don't believe so.

Even if the opposition stayed back and participated they wouldn't have won.

More pressing problem or question is why IK felt the need to change the CM? Was there genuine administrative concern or because previous one didn't get along with his family?
 
No doubt Imran Khan a great man, I wish he continued to be the PM but if only he had high level of political and diplomatic skills to get the opposition, establishment and international community on board. After his removal it all went to disaster. Today Pakistan has gone back to the mafias whom we all hated. Imran Khan should just leave Pakistan or leave politics, he is 73, he should take the back seat and let his party become strong independent movement, after all who will handle his party after him.

As of now, I have not questioned Imran's 'loyalty', nor I pay attention to the minor issues like the Toshakhana Case or other real or alleged acts of 'corruption', nor have I ever called him some 'Yahudi Agent' etc etc. I have questioned his use of ethnic card and his use of the K-P Province's resources to cause enough agitation to destabilize Pakistan in his attempt to get back to power. But his major flaw is severe egotistic behavior on top of extreme political naivete; he shares major personality flaws with the likes of Nawaz Sharif and Altaf Hussein. He was unfit to rule a complex country like Pakistan, much like those two other men.

And if you look at the Poll results in this thread, on a forum with a large pro Imran expat community, even here you'd see that PTI is very likely to not survive Imran's death. Maybe one of his sisters, wife or some close opportunistic political fellows like Shah Mehmood Qureshi would continue 'the struggle' while carrying the dead Imran's photo but you know that would not be a political party and it would be reduced to some parts of K-P Province.

In short, the Project Imran had no future, has no future. It does sadden me how an apparently well-meaning national hero has been reduced to this. I too got fooled for a while by him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top