Reforming Command Without Weakening It - Part 1 - A Pragmatic Approach for Systemic reform in Pakistan starting with the Army

[mythbuster]

"Pot meet kettle?" Would you expand on that, please?

It means Nathoram meets Allahditta

 

[Solomon2]

It means Nathoram meets Allahditta

In general, "Pot meet kettle" is an observation - or accusation - of hypocrisy.

This proverb is meant to highlight psychological projection. It may be that of the target or that of the person employing it.

 

[RescueRanger]

In general, "Pot meet kettle" is an observation - or accusation - of hypocrisy.

This proverb is meant to highlight psychological projection. It may be that of the target or that of the person employing it.

 

[mythbuster]

In general, "Pot meet kettle" is an observation - or accusation - of hypocrisy.

This proverb is meant to highlight psychological projection. It may be that of the target or that of the person employing it.

Did you just googled the meaning?

 

[Meengla]

I am pleased with the current hybrid system and wish it to continue for many more years. BTW, I don't consider there is a reason to divide the military and the civilians: They are all cut from the same cloth.

 

[Owaiz]

Comparing Pakistan to Bangladesh or India is just stupid. No two ways about it.

Since India , Pakistan and Bangladesh were part of the same political entity till 1947 and Pakistan and Bangladesh were part of the same political entity till 1971 , it is only natural and obvious to make this comparison. What is stupid is to shut off one's cognitive faculties to obvious facts that stare you in the face.

It is constitutionally and structurally significantly different. Once you fundamentally understand that Pakistan is a security state

Did the Lahore Resolution say that Pakistan has to be a security state ? Or did representatives of the people elected through even sham elections decide it must be so ? Just because someone has done kabza on the state doesn't mean it is the natural order of things.

Here is some food for thought for you. Bangladesh, Sri Lanka , Nepal spend far less than Pakistan on defence and have all had serious disputes with India. Yet, they have all retained their sovereignty and territory and have a reasonable peaceful internal security situation . On the other hand, Pakistan has nukes and has kept spending on defence even if it has had to go the IMF more times than any other country in the world. Yet it has lost territory to war and has the worst internal security situation. Perhaps, if the resources had been spent on developing social and economic capital instead of a security state, Pakistan could have been an economic tiger instead of a basket case.

 

[Hopefully Pessimistic]

Since India , Pakistan and Bangladesh were part of the same political entity till 1947 and Pakistan and Bangladesh were part of the same political entity till 1971 , it is only natural and obvious to make this comparison. What is stupid is to shut off one's cognitive faculties to obvious facts that stare you in the face.


Did the Lahore Resolution say that Pakistan has to be a security state ? Or did representatives of the people elected through even sham elections decide it must be so ? Just because someone has done kabza on the state doesn't mean it is the natural order of things.

Here is some food for thought for you. Bangladesh, Sri Lanka , Nepal spend far less than Pakistan on defence and have all had serious disputes with India. Yet, they have all retained their sovereignty and territory and have a reasonable peaceful internal security situation . On the other hand, Pakistan has nukes and has kept spending on defence even if it has had to go the IMF more times than any other country in the world. Yet it has lost territory to war and has the worst internal security situation. Perhaps, if the resources had been spent on developing social and economic capital instead of a security state, Pakistan could have been an economic tiger instead of a basket case.

don't be an idiot, being a security state is a structural reality not something written in a constitutional clause, and now comparing it again with Bangladesh and Nepal which are homogenous nations with no security challenges after already being explained the obvious difference is just wilful stupidity