Both Pakistan and India have experimental MiRV technology in the present. Hype material for both camps but not something that I will hype in the present.That's stupid
Pakistan not only has MIRV capable missiles, but ballistic missiles that are manoeuvrable to bypass A.D
Missiles going at Mach 15-20 which can also manoeuvre are near impossible to stop
An Iranian missile fired from Yemen last week punched through multiple Israeli A.D without being stopped, the same as when Iran launched it's attack which was mostly drones
It took multiple states to try to stop the attack and even then many missiles got through
But yes, ballistic missiles are difficult intercept because they are fast at very high altitudes and RV have a small RCS. India does not have a comprehensive BMD in place, only two Indian cities are well-protected in the present. Indians seem to develop and test different BMD interceptor variants but testing is different from deployment and integration.
Pakistan can also use cruise missiles and drones to attack Indian radar systems to reduce Indian line of sight in some places before using ballistic missiles. It is important to have a strategy. Perhaps there is some thought given to this matter.
And how can you do all that? How many BMD systems have you deployed and where? Let's have a look.Not even MIRV can deter India because India has the capability to neutralize missiles in their boost phase anywhere in Pakistan, along with air superiority and extensive on-ground and satellite intelligence to locate and destroy Pakistani nuclear installations. These systems will only improve as India's economy grows and research and development advance. That's why I maintain that Pakistan can never have a credible nuclear deterrence against India. In fact, even Afghanistan is not deterred by Pakistan's so-called nuclear deterrence, let alone India.
The only way to deliver nuclear weapons onto Indian territory is through a submarine-launched nuclear missile, and that too only if the submarine is nuclear-powered, has long-range capabilities, and is stealthy enough to evade detection by the Indian Navy’s submarine hunters.
I appreciate your sentiment but the US have a variety of methods to collect information about defenses of "any" country in the world. Pakistan is a country of limited resources and there is a limit to concealing things on the ground. The US have had sufficient time to collect information during WOT days. There is also the possibility of influencing or manipulating officers to provide information as happened to Gen Iqbal. Nevertheless, Pakistan has a well-developed nuclear infrastructure and sufficient conventional defenses to counter India. India also collects information but its capacity to attack Pakistani defenses is limited. So all is good for now.Or, they don't have that much intimate knowledge at the first place! I'm just trying to insinuate at some "despicable" probabilities! Once a US delegation, at the height of the WOT, was complaining that the Pak side looked so much completely lost at the discussions which were taking place that they thought the Pak intelligence had sent some dummies into that meeting! The US side couldn't figure out what the Pak side wanted for the folks had no clues...