Russia-Ukraine War - News, Discussions & Updates

Yommie said:
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/1etg9qt/ua_pov_no_movement_of_russian_larger_and
Click to expand...
This is the crux

Whilst I'm sure the Russians are not happy this invasion into Kursk was an attempt to get those experienced and better trained Russian units away from the Donbass and into Kursk, BUT the Russians are not falling for it

They are giving the Ukrainians plenty of space in Kursk to expand

Building trenches and brining in reserves and lesser units into holding positions so the Ukrainians can't push out and then using drones and missiles etc to target the Ukrainians

In the meantime the Russians keep pushing in the east, the Ukrainians can't hold Kursk so how much resources can they commit to this pointless exercise , at the cost of the rest of the conflict?
 
hussain0216 said:
Kursk is a DIVERSION to try and DIVERT Russian troops from the Eastern front

Think about the approaching Russian force at Pokrovsk the Russians are pushing fast and are within touching distance now and when that city falls, all of the remaining Donbass is next

Ukraine has not taken any significant territory on the Eastern front for a year or two now

So they pull this weird stunt, now fair play they are trying
But all it is a diversion tactic and spit in Putins eye

The Russians aim if anything will be to stabilize Kursk and even keep Ukrainians forces THERE, fighting over nothing whilst they lose Eastern Ukraine

If Ukraine then is forced to redeploy to the front then they have less men to defend Kursk invasion and they will be slaughtered on both fronts
Click to expand...
There is a saying you probably know it: only time will tell.

Ukraine strategy is attacking the russians where they least expected. Russia best army is in Ukraine, in opposite Russia mainland is empty. But full with cheap propaganda, poor and corrupt leadership, underequipped troops. it makes sense for Ukraine to invade Russia to take lands, resources, cutting off the supply lines. Let the russian zombies continue to attack Donbas, Donetsk. Ukraine strategy there is killing as many Russians as possible then withdraw to fallback positions.
 
You cannot call the Kiev ‘offensive' successful as it has barely begun.It will only be a success IF it captures a strategically important position, establishes ongoing control of the territory, or inflicts serious losses on defending forces. So far the AFU has not captured any strategic position, has suffered significant losses, and has been in position long enough to qualify as 'control of territory'. In the last two days, the AFU has given ground anywhere it has been attacked by regular Russian forces.
Not a good indicator.
 
Lets do a math.

Assuming the russians continue to make gradual gains on Ukraine territories as they have done in the last 3 years, how long will it take for Russia to conquer 100% of Ukraine, and with how many russian casualties?

It would take 500-566 years.

Russia deaths would be 30 millions (minimum) to 100 millions (median), the maximum death rate would be more uglier. If adding the number of wounded russians the number would exceed the current Russia population.

 
Viet said:
Lets do a math.

Assuming the russians continue to make gradual gains on Ukraine territories as they have done in the last 3 years, how long will it take for Russia to conquer 100% of Ukraine, and with how many russian casualties?

It would take 500-566 years.

Russia deaths would be 30 millions (minimum) to 100 millions (median), the maximum death rate would be more uglier. If adding the number of wounded russians the number would exceed the current Russia population.

Click to expand...

It would take millenia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 11 (members: 5, guests: 6)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top