Where do I say that Iran is a cause for worry for the new government of Syria? I believe that Iran has reopened their embassy in Damascus, so neither the Syrian government nor Iran have any problems with each other. It’s only the online warriors who’re dying of worry.
Muslim countries need representative governments like every one else. China has an unelected authoritarian government but it has done a good job so people approve it. If it was a puppet of the US that kept China poor the Chinese people would have overthrown it.
Muslim countries have many awful Anglo-Zionist backed governments that need to be replaced. Afghanistan is not a good example because it’s a country that was occupied and bombed for 40 years by the Russians and Americans.
You see, in order for someone to excel and climb to the top in the Chinese system, you need two things: you need to be super-smart, otherwise you can’t get to the top of your class; you also need to have practical experience and extraordinary work ethic, otherwise you can’t get promoted through the KPI-based system. Well, it turns out that Intelligence has a strong tendency of regression to the mean, and people who grew up in adverse conditions tend to work harder, and understand human nature and society as a whole in a more profound way. So super smart scholar-officials from relatively poor families ended up being the mainstay of China’s bureaucracy.
Thus if you look through China’s two thousand years of record of famous cabinet ministers and prime ministers, two-generation is extremely rare. Three generation is unheard of. The competition is too fierce to allow the likes of Marlboro / Spencer / Kennedy families to come into existence.
The Chinese system is by far the most fundamentally ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT governing systems out there. It’s designed as a peaceful periodic transfer of power - to people who are smarter, and more capable, than the current cohort. So there’s no way any ruling class in any country serious wants to adopt the Chinese system. If someone is serious about trying the “China model”, first they need to educate the citizens so that everybody is qualified to take the National Civil Service exam. Then they must recruit only from the very top 5% into government service. Then they must have everyone starts from the bottom, and only promote those who can hit KPIs based on hard numbers, like GDP growth + # of college graduates + lower crime statistics + renewable energy growth +… Is there anybody doing this? No? Well then, what “Chinese Model” are you talking about? And the hard-earned power you have, you can’t keep it in the family, you can’t pass it on to your children, you lose it as soon as you fail to perform at the highest level. Which political elite would advocate for such a system for himself?
When people say they want to try the “China model”, they are not talking about the real China. They are talking about this Authoritarian China Avatar that’s created by the Media, like you can be an unaccountable dictator or something. In reality, Xi can’t make any Politburo decision unless he can persuade at least 5 out of the other 6 Politburo members, who are all elected on their own merit and can not be fired by Xi. Because Politburo decisions require 7:0 or 6:1 consensus.
My point is Chinese system is not the same as any Islamic system. China is a meritocracy only the best and the brightest can get to the top of the ladder. U think jolani can make it in Chinese system? At best he would be managing some village then get fired for incompetency lol