Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation

[FarhanSiddiqui]

Hama massacre occurred in February 1982 when the Syrian Arab Army and the Defense Companies paramilitary force, under the orders of President Hafez al-Assad, besieged the town of Hama for 27 days in order to quell an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood against the Alawite Ba'athist government which killed 50,000 Sunni civilians . That was the beginning of massacres and revenge massacres.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[muhammed45]

Hama massacre occurred in February 1982 when the Syrian Arab Army and the Defense Companies paramilitary force, under the orders of President Hafez al-Assad, besieged the town of Hama for 27 days in order to quell an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood against the Alawite Ba'athist government which killed 50,000 Sunni civilians . That was the beginning of massacres and revenge massacres.

Not a revenge massacre. The whole country was fighting Zionists in the west and the Ikhwan traitors were busy with backstabbing the nationalist party of Assad family. Assad family is not even religious to begin with, Ba'ath party is composed mostly of Sunnis. They put Arab nationalism above religion.

Even the Alawis of Syria were somehow protesting and asked for negotiating with oposing sides. The fact that west hijacked Syrian uprising is an open source reality.

Even if we say that hey you are right, Ikhwan were killed, they were killed by nationalists not Alawis. SAA's backbone was Sunni before being purchased by Turkey (read NATO and USA) and Arab kinglets.

 

[FarhanSiddiqui]

Not a revenge massacre. The whole country was fighting Zionists in the west and the Ikhwan traitors were busy with backstabbing the nationalist party of Assad family. Assad family is not even religious to begin with, Ba'ath party is composed mostly of Sunnis. They put Arab nationalism above religion.

Even the Alawis of Syria were somehow protesting and asked for negotiating with oposing sides. The fact that west hijacked Syrian uprising is an open source reality.

Even if we say that hey you are right, Ikhwan were killed, they were killed by nationalists not Alawis. SAA's backbone was Sunni before being purchased by Turkey (read NATO and USA) and Arab kinglets.

Ba'athist was an Arab nationalist ideology which ruled Syria from 1963 and included Muslims and Christians of all sects. Then in 1966, Hafez al-Assad staged a coup and installed Alawi officers in senior army and government positions replacing non-Alawis. The Alawis are only 10% of the Syrian population but took over the government and the armed forces. Ikhwan and Alawis both are both responsible for the barbaric massacres.

 

[muhammed45]

Ba'athist was an Arab nationalist ideology which ruled Syria from 1963 and included Muslims and Christians of all sects. Then in 1966, Hafez al-Assad staged a coup and installed Alawi officers in senior army and government positions replacing non-Alawis. The Alawis are only 10% of the Syrian population but took over the government and the armed forces. Ikhwan and Alawis both are both responsible for the barbaric massacres.

After destroying ISIS, except for supporting Gaza and Lebanon, i saw no reason for Iran to stay in Syria and spend our hardly earned cash in that hotspot. All the Ikhwan had to do was uniting against Zionists. But they did the opposite like always did and then claimed a revenge.

Now Syria is in their hands. Like Egypt of Morsi that sent letters of love and peace to the zionists and started a huge campaign of Irano phobia and Shia phobia. Guess what, Zionists threw Morsi into dustbin of history.

 

[FarhanSiddiqui]

After destroying ISIS, except for supporting Gaza and Lebanon, i saw no reason for Iran to stay in Syria and spend our hardly earned cash in that hotspot. All the Ikhwan had to do was uniting against Zionists. But they did the opposite like always did and then claimed a revenge.

Now Syria is in their hands. Like Egypt of Morsi that sent letters of love and peace to the zionists and started a huge campaign of Irano phobia and Shia phobia. Guess what, Zionists threw Morsi into dustbin of history.

Zionazis have support of US, Europe, Russia and their allies. Gaza have shown that this is not time to liberate Palestine.

 

[Foinikas]

yep all he can do is constantly try to deflect to his usual obsession with iran and Hezbollah. pretty sad

On one side there is a movement which was also a legitimate political party in Lebanon (and still is)and on the other,a coalition of various extremist,radical,highly conservative and maybe some moderate groups too,under the leadership of men who were in the worst terrorist organizations in the world and then split from them.

So he prefers to talk trash about the first and praise or excuse the other. It's the usual "But Assad..." and then "Iranian invaders",which makes no sense since it was the Syrian government who invited Iran as an ally to help in Syria. But "Turkey has been invited by the legal government of Syria",as if being an Erdogan vassal gives a warlord legitimacy.

Then people say "Syria is now democratic". Where is the democracy? "There has to be a transitional.." But why not hold election in 6 months,like they said originally? "Well it's not enough time with this chaos". Then why 4-5 years? That's basically HTS giving themselves a whole term without elections.

But hey,at least Assad is gone...right?

 

[muhammed45]

Zionazis have support of US, Europe, Russia and their allies. Gaza have shown that this is not time to liberate Palestine.

Russia and China won't give a hoot if tomorrow Israel disappears from the world map.

I have already mentioned in 2015-16 that Assad was no saint. He didn't even allow us to completely surround Israel with missiles and instead counted on Russian support. No one would sacrifice its national interests for an other country and Russia is of no exception. The complex relationship between Russian Jews in Israel with today's Russia left S-400 completely a piece of garbage leaving Syria a free attack zone for the Zionists.

However only Assad and the Ba'ath party allowed us to send minimum aid to Hezbollah and Hamas.

Question is, would JewLani allow us to do the same? Obviously no, surely not. He is dog of Turks and Turks themselves never stopped oil flow to Israel during masaacre of Gaza.

Israel has already unofficially claimed south of Syria. Remember the slogan, from Nile to Euphrates. JewLani has spreaded his legs for Zionists, at same time he is busy with tormenting Alawis of Latakia.

 

[Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ]

After destroying ISIS, except for supporting Gaza and Lebanon, i saw no reason for Iran to stay in Syria and spend our hardly earned cash in that hotspot. All the Ikhwan had to do was uniting against Zionists. But they did the opposite like always did and then claimed a revenge.

Now Syria is in their hands. Like Egypt of Morsi that sent letters of love and peace to the zionists and started a huge campaign of Irano phobia and Shia phobia. Guess what, Zionists threw Morsi into dustbin of history.

Morsi, the one who initiated rapprochement with Iran? Got accused of passing state secrets to Iran... that Morsi?

The civil war in Syria was multidimensional, cultural, social and religious. It had the secular Sunni establishment, Christians and Alawites in charge. Almost everyone else was opposed and oppressed. Which is why there wasn't a single cohesive front against Assad. Iranian angle was primarily sectarian... Russian support for the regime was primarily due to ties during the Soviet days. Turks were in for primarily ethnic concerns emanating from Syrian Kurdish regions and secondary with Ikhwan.

At the seeming conclusion of this civil war, Turkiye seems to be the clear victor. Kurds just recently joined with unity interim regime and, Ocalan has called PKK to lay down arms.

Now about resistance and Palestine. Hamas is Ikhwan! Banned in Syria under Assad!
To call this a cohesive front that has been broken is just plain ignoring the facts. The only loser here is Hezbollah for their part in supporting Assad. That being said... zion doesn't benefit from a cohesive and stable Syria. It has both the mass and ability to take on Zion, poorly equipped as it is and defeat it... but with a cost. That is mitigated only as it levels up...
The region isn't becoming conducive for zion in fact it is just beginning to warm up for the occasion. This is going for

 

[muhammed45]

Morsi, the one who initiated rapprochement with Iran? Got accused of passing state secrets to Iran... that Morsi?

Yeah the same Morsi allowed Shia phobia in north of Africa in accordance with Zionists' demands.

Iranian angle was primarily sectarian.

Bullshit. We only protected the holy shrine.

. Turks were in for primarily ethnic concerns emanating from Syrian Kurdish regions and secondary with Ikhwan.

Turks were there in collaboration with NATO. Assad was common enemy of Israel, west and Ikhwan traitors.

The only clash point was Kurds and after dealing over Assad, YPG and PKK are uniting with Turks and their JewLani dog.

At the seeming conclusion of this civil war, Turkiye seems to be the clear victor.

Don't judge so fast, time will tell. Israeli goal is not what you have already assumed to be. Turks are the disposable safe nothing more. However, they have understood the grand game and unfortunately its too very late.

Hamas is Ikhwan!

Hamas is anti-Israeli Ikhwan. No problem with that. Assad ban was because of their primary support for anti government and anti state elements.

Assad is one of the reasons why they can make missiles and light weapons inside Palestine. Don't make history out of no where.

 

[hyperman]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

NEW: The final report on the massacres that have taken place in Syrian coastal areas. 803 individuals died.

• At least 172 members of security, police, and military forces were killed by non-state armed groups linked to the Assad regime.

• Additionally, at least 211 civilians, including a humanitarian worker, were killed in direct shootings carried out by Assad-linked groups.

• SNHR also documented the killing of at least 420 civilians and disarmed fighters, including 39 children, 49 women, and 27 medical personnel, by Syrian government and linked forces participating in military operations

So not 10 billion casualties, but 803. And Half were killed by Assadists.

 

[Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ]

Yeah the same Morsi allowed Shia phobia in north of Africa in accordance with Zionists' demands.

So, he was a bad ikhwan? Got it!

Bullshit. We only protected the holy shrine

And killed no one. Didn't recruit no one to fight for and on behalf of Assad from several states. Got it!

Turks were there in collaboration with NATO. Assad was common enemy of Israel, west and Ikhwan traitors.

Hmm... hosting the refugee fleeing Assad may be good for NATO and they were ending up in EU... so to keep them in Turkiye they got paid. And you mean the bad Ikhwan were Assad's enemies. Got it!

The only clash point was Kurds and after dealing over Assad, YPG and PKK are uniting with Turks and their JewLani dog.

So they played the long con. Got it!

Don't judge so fast, time will tell. Israeli goal is not what you have already assumed to be. Turks are the disposable safe nothing more. However, they have understood the grand game and unfortunately its too very late.

Yeah, now that Assad is gone ... it is too late. The disposable Turks can do nothing... got it!

Hamas is anti-Israeli Ikhwan. No problem with that. Assad ban was because of their primary support for anti government and anti state elements.

Finally the good Ikhwan who did a bad deed per Assad. But he still coddled them... got it!

Assad is one of the reasons why they can make missiles and light weapons inside Palestine. Don't make history out of no where.

Yes, the border Gaza shares with Syria helped. Well a great geography and history lesson.
Appreciate that and got it!

 

[muhammed45]

So, he was a bad ikhwan? Got it!


And killed no one. Didn't recruit no one to fight for and on behalf of Assad from several states. Got it!



Hmm... hosting the refugee fleeing Assad may be good for NATO and they were ending up in EU... so to keep them in Turkiye they got paid. And you mean the bad Ikhwan were Assad's enemies. Got it!


So they played the long con. Got it!




Yeah, now that Assad is gone ... it is too late. The disposable Turks can do nothing... got it!



Finally the good Ikhwan who did a bad deed per Assad. But he still coddled them... got it!



Yes, the border Gaza shares with Syria helped. Well a great geography and history lesson.
Appreciate that and got it!

Apparently you got it all as an smart back. Good

 

[The SC]

The first agreement was made between the Druze and the government, and Hakam Al -Hijri was excluded from the agreement

The agreement took place between the largest bloc of the Druze Laith Al -Balous and Suleiman Abdel Baqi, who are loyal to the Damascus Central Government

The agreement includes the integration of their factions into the General Security of the Ministry of Interior and not in the Ministry of Defense and that their service be in the province

The Public Security Department started preparing the pro -government Druze factions with equipment and cars to start their duties within days

The agreement appears to have come quickly to coincide with the agreement with Qasd

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[The SC]

Graduating a new batch at the Police College in Damascus Governorate..

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[The SC]

"Hadath" sources: Hezbollah led the Syrian coast operations militarily from the Hermel region at the request of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies