hyperman
INT'L MOD
This is an anti Pashinyan account, it exaggerates and misrepresents.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now,imagine if a President appeared in Turkey,saying "we should exclude the Declaration of Independence and forget the 1920-1922 war,because it only led to a new era of conflict". Or saying "we must forget Northern Cyprus". The guy would have been lynched or a coup would have taken him down.The Declaration of Independence of Armenia is not a declaration of independence, but a declaration of conflict, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated on Facebook live stream.
"The [ruling] Civil Contract Party is the only [political] force [in Armenia] that says that there should be no reference to the Declaration of Independence in the new constitution [of Armenia], it is a declaration of conflict, of conflict. We are not creating a state with that declaration to ensure the well-being and freedom of our citizens, but we are establishing a state for Nagorno-Karabakh and Western Armenia.
We must make that decision very clearly, especially since now the political field is essentially positioned in this logic: a party of peace, which says that we should not continue the Karabakh movement, and a party of war, which essentially directly or indirectly says that we should continue the Karabakh movement," the Armenian premier noted.
![]()
PM: Armenia's Declaration of Independence is a declaration of conflict (VIDEO)
We must make that decision very clearly...news.am
Now,imagine if a President appeared in Turkey,saying "we should exclude the Declaration of Independence and forget the 1920-1922 war,because it only led to a new era of conflict". Or saying "we must forget Northern Cyprus". The guy would have been lynched or a coup would have taken him down.
Yes,I know things are a bit different between Turkey and Armenia or any other country,
but imagine if that happened. My point is,Pashinyan is the archetype of the sellout leader,the Trojan Horse,the guy who is more centrist than the centrists. Because even communists who talk about peace and supposedly despise nationalism and irridentism,they wouldn't have gone THAT far as to say "we must make no reference to the declaration of independence". What could have Pashinyan or any other leader in Armenia done? Admit the defeat,try to minimize territorial losses and try to keep peaceful stance as much as he can. What is Pashinyan doing though? He rushed to sign the November 2020 plan,went further on to full collaboration with Azerbaijan and Turkey on whatever they demanded,he's denouncing all the history and legacy of his forefathers,basically everything current Armenians' ancestors fought for.
I know,I know. But my point is,Pashinyan seemed very eager to sign anything they gave him. And then started downplaying losing NKR,specifically I remember watching a video of him talking about a town,I think it was about Hadrut,saying things like "and what did we need it for,all these years and it wasn't developed" etc.Rushed to sign the november 2020 plan? You know Armenia was losing the war badly, and that saved the lives of thousands of Armenian soldiers? 25 thousand Armenian soldiers had become encircled in last days of the war.
If your constitution contains territorial claims against neighboring countries, it will be impossible to maintain good relations with your neighbors.Now,imagine if a President appeared in Turkey,saying "we should exclude the Declaration of Independence and forget the 1920-1922 war,because it only led to a new era of conflict". Or saying "we must forget Northern Cyprus". The guy would have been lynched or a coup would have taken him down.
Yes,I know things are a bit different between Turkey and Armenia or any other country,
but imagine if that happened. My point is,Pashinyan is the archetype of the sellout leader,the Trojan Horse,the guy who is more centrist than the centrists. Because even communists who talk about peace and supposedly despise nationalism and irridentism,they wouldn't have gone THAT far as to say "we must make no reference to the declaration of independence". What could have Pashinyan or any other leader in Armenia done? Admit the defeat,try to minimize territorial losses and try to keep peaceful stance as much as he can. What is Pashinyan doing though? He rushed to sign the November 2020 plan,went further on to full collaboration with Azerbaijan and Turkey on whatever they demanded,he's denouncing all the history and legacy of his forefathers,basically everything current Armenians' ancestors fought for.
He mentioned the declaration of independence shouldn't exist in the constitution,we're talking about the founding principles of a nation. Now I don't know what they say in their constitution about territorial claims,but I know Armenians always saw and felt NKR was their part. As for my comparison being "quite flawed",the Turkish constitutuon might say nothing about territorial claims,Turkish governments and actions though say a lot.If your constitution contains territorial claims against neighboring countries, it will be impossible to maintain good relations with your neighbors.
The Turkish constitution has never, at any point in history, contained territorial claims against neighboring countries.
Your comparison is quite flawed
Now,imagine if a President appeared in Turkey,saying "we should exclude the Declaration of Independence and forget the 1920-1922 war,because it only led to a new era of conflict". Or saying "we must forget Northern Cyprus". The guy would have been lynched or a coup would have taken him down.
Yes,I know things are a bit different between Turkey and Armenia or any other country,
but imagine if that happened. My point is,Pashinyan is the archetype of the sellout leader,the Trojan Horse,the guy who is more centrist than the centrists. Because even communists who talk about peace and supposedly despise nationalism and irridentism,they wouldn't have gone THAT far as to say "we must make no reference to the declaration of independence". What could have Pashinyan or any other leader in Armenia done? Admit the defeat,try to minimize territorial losses and try to keep peaceful stance as much as he can. What is Pashinyan doing though? He rushed to sign the November 2020 plan,went further on to full collaboration with Azerbaijan and Turkey on whatever they demanded,he's denouncing all the history and legacy of his forefathers,basically everything current Armenians' ancestors fought for.
He mentioned the declaration of independence shouldn't exist in the constitution,we're talking about the founding principles of a nation. Now I don't know what they say in their constitution about territorial claims,but I know Armenians always saw and felt NKR was their part. As for my comparison being "quite flawed",the Turkish constitutuon might say nothing about territorial claims,Turkish governments and actions though say a lot.
lmao the American Turk trying to be more Turk than Turks in Turkey.Lmao, Foiny trying to be more of an Armenian nationalist than the Armenians. lol, stop advocating for things that are not in Armenians interests.
No,I'm not advocating for belligerence,I'm talking about not forgetting the foundations of your statehood,the struggles of your forefathers,your tradition. You don't go out and say "well f the declaration of independence".Apples and oranges. Armenia's constitution specifically mentions that they want to take eastern Turkey and Karabakh. Turkey does not have that.
You are just advocating for belligerence, its not even in Armenian interests. b/c if they make claims on territories and they don't recognize borders with Turkey or Azerbaijan. What is there to say Turkey or Azerbaijan have to recognize these borders? Then you calculate who is more powerful Turkey and Azerbaijan or Armenia, and you realize how disastrous of a policy that is, and how much of a liability that is. Anyone supporting Armenia should realize, thats not a pro Armenians position.
No,I'm not advocating for belligerence,I'm talking about not forgetting the foundations of your statehood,the struggles of your forefathers,your tradition. You don't go out and say "well f the declaration of independence".
Does it actually say that?The Declaration of Independence says that the Armenian state considers Karabakh and "Western Armenia" as part of the state of Armenia, and that its the job of the state to take that land back. You put that in your constitution, you are putting yourself on a path to a conflict.
You're still not getting what I'm saying. Pashinyan could have said nothing about all that and not provoke. This guy has been denouncing actual Armenian patriotism since 2020. You guys go around blaming Egypt and Jordan as "American puppets" or "Zionist slaves",Stop advocating for Armenians to commit suicide foinikas, b/c if they get destroyed and become stateless, god knows it won't be you that goes to fight Turks and Azeris on their behalf, you aren't helping them.
Does it actually say that?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.