The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict

And who exactly cares what Russia's ally Iran thinks? The answer would be no one.
Not only does Iran's view not matter, there's nothing they can do about it.
No problem with regional countries having trade and ties, but no to US and Israel. If US bombs Iranian infrastructure, Iran has the right to do the same, directly or through allies.
 
According to Aliyev, Azerbaijan and ExxonMobil is on the verge of discovering a big new oil field. An agreement was signed between Socar and Exxon during his visit to USA.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

And just think,Russia is unable to do anything right now. Putin must be pissed off.
 
No problem with regional countries having trade and ties, but no to US and Israel. If US bombs Iranian infrastructure, Iran has the right to do the same, directly or through allies.
First of all, bigoted and shortsighted mullah regime in Iran has never been willing to cooperate regional countries. Especially not with us Turks. This has been the problem from the very beginning.

Secondly, if the USA is going to bomb Iran, it won't from Azerbaijan or from Armenia. It will be from the Gulf states or from Guam. But in the new situation, this factor has developed against Iran. Now, Iran will have to pay attention to its northern border as well.

But Iran's bigoted and shortsighted mullah regime is responsible for this situation. They have never accepted Azerbaijan. They have blindly chosen the Armenian side in every dispute. Now they are facing the consequences of this absurd policy.

My humble advice to Iran is to stop making any more nonsense in their relations with us, the Turks. Otherwise, we will open that corridor through Iran!!
 
No problem with regional countries having trade and ties, but no to US and Israel. If US bombs Iranian infrastructure, Iran has the right to do the same, directly or through allies.
Yeah, you go do that. Start a new front of war because US bombs you. Start a war against TR and Azerbaijan and see how that works out for you. 😂
 
Yeah, you go do that. Start a new front of war because US bombs you. Start a war against TR and Azerbaijan and see how that works out for you. 😂
I think turkey is trying to introduce NATO/Trans-Atlantic empire into caucasus, to put pressure on Iran and Russia, aming at harming BRICS.

This is a foolish and risky policy, to bet on a impulsive dying horse, supporting unilateral Israeli-US policies, while we aim for a better ASIA, better Global South, better World.

We could relatively fast reunify Azerbayjan with Iran, but that's currenty not our goal, unless we see danger of foreign espionage, blockade of Iranian goods passing through caucasus, military interference (posing as security companies).

If there is a war between Iran and Azerbayjan, you don't want to become a puppet of the empire like ukraine or georgia. Learn from the mistakes of destroyed countries.
 
I think turkey is trying to introduce NATO/Trans-Atlantic empire into caucasus
So Azerbaijan and Armenia ending war means the beginning of a NATO Empire forming? Does this make sense to you.

We could relatively fast reunify Azerbayjan with Iran
Azerbaijanis are Turks. They share nothing with Iranians except a border. You Iranians have a better chance unifying with Afghanistan.
 
First of all, bigoted and shortsighted mullah regime in Iran has never been willing to cooperate regional countries. Especially not with us Turks. This has been the problem from the very beginning.

Secondly, if the USA is going to bomb Iran, it won't from Azerbaijan or from Armenia. It will be from the Gulf states or from Guam. But in the new situation, this factor has developed against Iran. Now, Iran will have to pay attention to its northern border as well.

But Iran's bigoted and shortsighted mullah regime is responsible for this situation. They have never accepted Azerbaijan. They have blindly chosen the Armenian side in every dispute. Now they are facing the consequences of this absurd policy.

My humble advice to Iran is to stop making any more nonsense in their relations with us, the Turks. Otherwise, we will open that corridor through Iran!!
Iran is part of BRICS, SCO, so your propaganda and western-brand/zionist Iranophobia (spreading lies) doesnt change the fact that Iran is actively seeking (inter)regional cooperation and multipolarism, instead of Turkey-backed Trans-Atlantic Unilateralism.

We don't want to see any anti-Iranian activity in the region because we've seen the results which martyred many of our citizens. It's up to you to frame it how you like, but we answer aggression from world powers, let alone a zionist agent from baku, and this is not being against azeris or azerbayjan as identity or people, we have more azeris inside Iran.
 
Iran is part of BRICS, SCO, so your propaganda and western-brand/zionist Iranophobia (spreading lies) doesnt change the fact that Iran is actively seeking (inter)regional cooperation and multipolarism, instead of Turkey-backed Trans-Atlantic Unilateralism.

We don't want to see any anti-Iranian activity in the region because we've seen the results which martyred many of our citizens. It's up to you to frame it how you like, but we answer aggression from world powers, let alone a zionist agent from baku, and this is not being against azeris or azerbayjan as identity or people, we have more azeris inside Iran.

@Merzifonlu made a valid point, though. Many Iranians participating in this forum depict the Turko-Persian relationship as one characterized by perpetual Turkish hostility, which is factually inaccurate, and I am confident that most Iranians recognize this. Consider Syria as a case in point. Whether you accept it or not, Ankara made numerous efforts to share influence in Syria with Tehran prior to the collapse of the Assad regime. The lingering question is whether Assad rejected your desires—if so, blaming Türkiye is a simplistic excuse to evade self-reflection—or if the Iranians were simply unwilling to tolerate any Turkish influence in Damascus. Personally, I believe that Assad opted for Russia over Iran and ultimately faced significant failures. I am also convinced that, in private discussions, the Iranian leadership acknowledges that Türkiye does not represent an existential threat to Iran. Your leadership knows why Israel wanted Assad to stay remain in power.

The entire Zengezur corridor is mainly something that Baku desires, and the Turkish side just goes along with what they want. This time, the outcome is good for Ankara, but that’s not always how it works with the cooperation between Azerbaijan and Türkiye. Usually, Baku takes advantage of Ankara for its own gain, and most of Türkiye is okay with this because they consider them like family. However, when the borders between Armenia and Türkiye open up again, Türkiye will gain nothing from this corridor, while Baku will benefit greatly from having a secure route from the mainland to Nahcivan.
 
See, there are millions of Turks living in Iran, yet instead of leveraging them as a form of soft power in Ankara to sway the Turkish government's decisions, you opted for a confrontational approach. You must recognize that much of Türkiye's actions regarding the Iranian-Turkish relationship stem from a complete lack of coherence and long-term vision from Tehran. Despite Erdogan's massive flaws, he has learned to adopt a long-term strategy in the Middle East, which has proven effective in places like Libya, Karabakh, Armenia, Syria, and Iraq etc.

He has - at least partly - learned from his past mistakes, which is something I don't observe in Iran. No vision means no strategy means no future in the Middle East.
 
Here comes the delusion.

You can eat daşşağ, that’s all you can do.
We have things named hypersonic missiles which could cause internal damage to your organs. We can defeat you if red lines are crossed, but we prefere not to use missiles since aliyev regime is not equal to azeri citizens.
 
But Iran's bigoted and shortsighted mullah regime is responsible for this situation. They have never accepted Azerbaijan. They have blindly chosen the Armenian side in every dispute. Now they are facing the consequences of this absurd policy.
The former Azerbaijan President Abulfaz Elchibey, in office 17 June 1992 to 24 June 1993, demanded that Iran hand over Iranian Azeri provinces to Azerbaijan. Azeris have ruled Persia/Iran for 900 of last 1000 years. Azerbaijan was part of Iran until the Russia occupied in Gulistan Treaty in 1813. Both Turkey and Pakistan has tense relation with current Iran governments. Pan-Turkist Azerbaijani nationalist and anti-Iranian Abulfaz Elchibey made the Iran-Azerbaijan relations worse and forced Iran to support Armenia against Azerbaijan.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top