The Case for Pakistan as a Civilizational State

[rakib]

@rakib spamming, might end up pink

If you have questions, I am willing to look into it. I am curious why you are calling it spamming. Is any of the post off topic?

 

[rakib]

Good AI summary, but I would caution against making sweeping conclusions on of limited data. Long way to go yet to confirm these findings.

The general movement of original IVC peoples from west to east/south seems very likely though during the IVC's decline.

These are the broad consensus from latest papers and books. If you have specific questions, please let me know. I can find source material for it.

 

[r3alist]

If you have questions, I am willing to look into it. I am curious why you are calling it spamming. Is any of the post off topic?

It's random bs, no context no framing no discussion

Just takes up space

 

[Master Chief]

These are the broad consensus from latest papers and books. If you have specific questions, please let me know. I can find source material for it.

Like I said, lots of useful info in there but it is a bit of a "data dump" approach. It attracts readership better by being more focused IMHO.

Also the data remains limited to make too many general inferences...yet. E.g. Rakhigari is ONE direct sample (albeit, together with proxies).

I was keen to understand more on Mehrgahr and you have posted some useful material on that. Thanks.

 

[peagle]

This is the only appropriate term to describe this region.

@Master Chief

Why you scratching your head bro?

Don't worry, i already know. foolish minds think alike.

I was referring to the wider region.

There's the Our Pakistani Indus region.
there's the subcontinental South Asian region,
there's the continental Asian region,
there's the maga Eurasian region,
there's the planetary region of Earth, within the milky way,
There's the solar system region of milky way, lol
There's the galactic region of the milky way in this universe.

i hope it's clear now

 

[peagle]

If you have questions, I am willing to look into it. I am curious why you are calling it spamming. Is any of the post off topic?

I do have questions, if you don't mind.
There's nothing earth shattering, just repetition of lazy theories and what not, but setting that aside for now.

Could you please tell me what is the relevance?
What is your point? Or,
What is your argument?

I read this last night close to 3am when i could not sleep, briefly read it again this morning but somehow i missed the point.


p.s.
I'm likely to reply at most once or twice in a day.