Michael
VIP Member
@Joe Shearer
In Chinese analytical theory, there is this saying, “存在即合理”---This is a dialectical thinking concept.What it means when used in this topic is:
Any system that exists in human society is based on a certain range, a certain period of time, the product of a certain group of people, it is bound to be reasonable under certain conditions.
I would not question the rationality of the Indian caste system. It has existed in Indian society for a very long time. The fact that it has survived for a long time shows that it is a system that is compatible with Indian society. If it was grossly incompatible with Indian society, then it should have been overthrown a long time ago. Any social system is bound to have beneficiaries and victims. The victims are bound to resist. But the extent of their resistance depends on how the beneficiaries of the system deal with these social conflicts.
Hierarchy in human society has existed since the time of the beasts. To this day, hierarchies still exist in all social systems around the globe, it's just that, they are described in different ways.
Regardless of the social system, there are still a large number of people at the bottom of the social hierarchy.
In some social systems, the innately lower social groups can change their destiny through their own efforts.
In some social systems, the congenital underclass social groups, they cannot change their destiny through their own efforts.
In modern civilization, we usually use this criterion to evaluate the rationality of a social system.
Therefore, if the caste system in India is moderately reformed so that the bottom social groups can change their social class through their own efforts, it can still continue to exist for a long time. Otherwise, when the oppressive value of the underlying social groups reaches a certain level, they are bound to explode.




