They should have agree to a federal Bosnia in 1992 but decided to use military force to take what they wanted.
But the problem was,same with the mess that happened in the USSR as well,the Bosnian Muslims wanted to leave the Federation(Yugoslavia),but the Serbs didn't. They wanted to stay.The Croats were ok more or less,but they mostly wanted Herzegovina to be part of Croatia.
Anway why do you think the US/West was anti-Serb?
They gave the biggest support to the Serbs by imposing that "arms embargo" when the Serbs had all the weapons and the Bosnians hardly any. Without that "arms embargo", Muslim countries would have flooded the Bosnians with heavy weapons and the Serbs would not have been able to capture as much territory as they were able to.
The embargo applied to Croats as well. The embargo was another one of those dumb UN strategies,just like in Libya,where they would impose an arms embargo,yet wouldn't dare enforce it on Turkish ships arming the GNA or Russians arming the LNA.
Some of the biggest triumphs of Western propaganda happened in Bosnia. Madeleine Albright,zionist and heavily anti-Serb,was leading the fight.
But here's the interesting thing that ties it all with this thread here:
In all these cases,Turkey had a geopolitical victory:
Bosnia-The creation of a pro-Turkish State with the Bosnian Muslims cherishing their Ottoman past
Kosovo-The creation of yet another majority Muslim State in the Balkans,friendly to Turkey
Libya-The GNA government of Tripoli has given Turkey a foot on North Africa and ways to,even illegally,circumvent international law and sign EEZ agreements. Don't forget the other opportunities: Bases,investments,oil,cannon fodder.
Syria-Probably the biggest geopolitical triumph of Turkey after Libya. A vassal State with more EEZ agreements,oil opportunities,investments,cannon fodder and it's basically a huge base for the Turkish Armed Forces. Plenty of opportunities.
Ukraine-Zelensky cooperates,Putin cooperates...Erdogan is making money out of both.