Lulldapull
Senior Member
- Oct 21, 2006
- 2,197
- 1,497
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Hard to believe you are not listening? Oh bhai after 10,000 Russian tanks, APC’s and Howitzers were destroyed and a similar number for the Uki’s, they both realized that you can’t fight a war like this. Hundreds of billions down the toilet is when they discovered that we can keep on fighting on the cheap using FPVs and Lancets and Shahed drones and cheaper Iranian ballistic missiles and scalps and neptunes, which actually produce results and you don’t lose the crew.Dude, please let me help you in this
The ru uki war didn't start with only missiles and drones did it
Can you successfully win a conflict only with missiles and drones
What about air superiority ?
These questions all have their context depending on aims and so many factors
But I agree wth you that Iran is plausibly ahead of Pak in effective drone usage strategies because they have had to be good at it and they have had decades to think about it
Though in net aggregate military capability, which is what Pak needs to counter India, they are more mature and advanced than Iran
All Russian and uki convetional weapons have been largely destroyed. Russian Black Sea fleet devastated and both Russia and uki’s have local air superiority, but they cant go into each others airspace or risk losing the jet or choppa.
Air superiority is moot. It makes no sense in today’s world. Air defenses make short work of any jet in 2 minutes.
Do you honestly believe our JFs or Al Khalids or VT-4’s type 054’s would fare any better than T-90’s Leopards or any vessel in the Black Sea fleet against Indian ATGMs or Brahmos or Indian equipment against our ATGMs or manpads or our Exocets or Harpoons or RAADs?
Only thing conventional still worth its weight in gold is artillery. It’s the only thing which has consistently worked and smart guided rounds have made all the diff for both sides.
Nothing else from the legacy weapons list.