US lawmaker proposes building most Navy ships in South Korea

Beijingwalker

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
92,655
Reaction score
113,256
Reputation
2,084.4
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

U.S. lawmaker proposes building most Navy ships in South Korea

By Asia Today and translated by UPI,

July 17 (Asia Today) -- A senior U.S. lawmaker proposed building as much as 80% of some American naval vessels in South Korea while reserving sensitive technology and final assembly for the United States.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=29R587_1DPHwXVI00


Korea Foundation and shipbuilding industry representatives attend a South Korea-U.S. shipbuilding and maritime innovation forum Thursday at RAND in Arlington, Va. Photo by Asia Today

Rep. Ami Bera of California, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee overseeing East Asia and the Pacific, said Thursday that relying exclusively on domestic shipyards was unrealistic because the United States lacks sufficient workers and production capacity.

Bera spoke at a South Korea-U.S. shipbuilding and maritime innovation forum hosted by the Korea Foundation and the RAND research organization in Arlington, Va.

"To say we are going to build everything in the United States is wrong," Bera said, urging Washington to make greater use of allied manufacturing capacity.

He suggested that South Korean shipyards could produce hulls and other components accounting for 75% to 80% of a vessel, while highly sensitive systems could be manufactured and installed in the United States.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0nuZiw_1DPHwXVI00


Rep. Ami Bera, D-Calif., speaks Thursday at a South Korea-U.S. shipbuilding and maritime innovation forum at RAND in Arlington, Va. Photo by Asia Today
Bera also proposed a distributed construction model under which components would be produced at different locations before being brought to the United States for final assembly.

"If we do not have the workers or construction capacity in the United States, we have to build where ships can be built," he said.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0zRavQ_1DPHwXVI00


Shipbuilding executives and experts discuss South Korea-U.S. maritime cooperation Thursday at RAND in Arlington, Va. Photo by Asia Today
Bera said combining the capabilities of the United States and its allies would strengthen deterrence and help prevent a military conflict with China.

Technology controls and visas remain obstacles

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4A5Wjl_1DPHwXVI00


Hanwha Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia could support expanded South Korea-U.S. shipbuilding cooperation. Photo by Asia Today

Bera said President Donald Trump had discussed nuclear-powered submarine construction with South Korea.

Such cooperation would require the two countries to address technology sharing and export control restrictions, he said.

Bera cited the security partnership among the United States, Britain and Australia as a possible model for resolving issues related to joint naval construction.

The partnership, commonly known as AUKUS, includes plans for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines with American and British assistance.

Bera also called on the United States to facilitate the entry of South Korean engineers and technicians needed to support investments by Korean shipbuilding companies.

He described the detention of more than 300 South Korean workers in Georgia in September as an "embarrassing fiasco" and said the visa problem must be resolved.

The United States has encouraged South Korean companies to invest in American manufacturing while immigration restrictions have complicated the deployment of specialized Korean personnel to construction sites and shipyards.

Expert says U.S. rebuilding could take decades

Shin Jong-gye, a professor emeritus of naval architecture and ocean engineering at Seoul National University, said China's overall shipbuilding capacity by gross tonnage was more than 230 times that of the United States.

He said China had more than 50 dry docks large enough to accommodate aircraft carriers.

Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia is the only U.S. shipyard capable of designing and building nuclear-powered aircraft carriers.

Shin said the United States must expand both its physical shipyard capacity and its ability to build vessels quickly and efficiently.

South Korea, Japan and China benefit from building commercial and naval vessels within the same industrial ecosystems, allowing them to share technology, workers and supply chains, he said.

The United States lacks a comparable commercial shipbuilding base and therefore cannot obtain the same economies of scale, Shin said.

South Korea, Japan and China together account for more than 95% of global commercial shipbuilding.

Shin said rebuilding an industry requires accumulated experience, technology and repeated construction cycles.

He estimated that rebuilding the U.S. shipbuilding sector independently could take 20 to 30 years, while cooperation with South Korea could significantly shorten the process.

Shin proposed initially building complete ships in South Korea while developing supply chains in the United States. American production could then be expanded gradually.

He said protecting South Korean intellectual property, providing appropriate compensation and resolving visa restrictions for Korean specialists would be essential.

Hanwha, HD Hyundai respond to Navy request

Michael Coulter, president and chief executive officer of Hanwha Defense USA, said protectionism was one of the largest obstacles to industrial cooperation.

He said South Korea and the United States often viewed each other primarily as export markets rather than partners sharing a common industrial base.

Coulter said the U.S. Navy had issued a request for information after consulting the South Korean government and Korean shipbuilders.

The request examined the possible use of a vessel construction manager who would help finalize a ship's design before construction begins.

South Korean shipyards generally complete designs before starting construction, while U.S. Navy projects often undergo design changes after work has begun, increasing costs and delaying delivery, Coulter said.

The U.S. government has asked Hanwha about options ranging from building combat vessels and supplying motors to constructing hulls in South Korea before installing American technology, he said.

Coulter said, however, that the administration and Congress had not reached a unified position.

He called on the two countries to integrate portions of their industrial bases rather than treat each investment or contract as a conventional export transaction.

Hong Suk-hwan, president and chief executive officer of HD Hyundai USA, proposed a two-track strategy involving investment in U.S. shipyards and partnerships with existing American companies.


Hong said HD Hyundai had built about 5,000 vessels during the past 50 years and could apply its skilled workforce, manufacturing experience and supply network to the United States.

He also proposed a "bridge strategy" in which American workers would train at South Korean shipyards for about three years while ships were being constructed there.

The trained workers could then return to the United States as supervisors and production managers at American shipyards.

U.S. law limits overseas warship construction

Brittany Clayton, a senior operations researcher at RAND, said complicated U.S. defense procurement procedures, unpredictable orders and design changes during construction remained major barriers to cooperation.

The Navy, Defense Department and Congress all play roles in funding and policy decisions, making rapid action difficult, she said.

Clayton said companies needed consistent and predictable demand from the U.S. government before making long-term investments.

She also cited proposed legislation restricting the overseas construction of American combat vessels.

Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, whose district includes the Bath Iron Works shipyard, introduced an amendment to the fiscal 2027 defense authorization bill that would restrict foreign construction of combat ships.

Clayton said distributed construction could provide an alternative, with components built at multiple locations before being integrated and tested in the United States.

She also suggested beginning cooperation with strategic sealift vessels, which contain fewer sensitive military technologies than combat ships.

The Senate Armed Services Committee included language in its fiscal 2027 defense authorization legislation that would permit the acquisition of up to two noncombat vessels from allied shipyards, including bulk fuel carriers and strategic sealift ships.

Trump said Wednesday that his administration was examining shipbuilders in South Korea and other countries and could purchase some vessels built outside the United States.

Kristin Gunness of San Diego State University said the university had signed an agreement with Samsung Heavy Industries to establish a marine engineering and shipbuilding center.

She said the university was also developing exchange programs with Seoul National University and other South Korean institutions.

Shin proposed short-term educational programs involving retired South Korean professors and American universities to train ship designers and production managers.
 
80% of US navy ships will be built by S.Korea. This might be the only hope that US can survive its own almost non existant shipbuilding industry.
 
80% of US navy ships will be built by S.Korea. This might be the only hope that US can survive its own almost non existant shipbuilding industry.
When China is identified as the primary adversary in the Pacific ??? That is terrible thinking.
 
80% of US navy ships will be built by S.Korea. This might be the only hope that US can survive its own almost non existant shipbuilding industry.
All US warships have been, and are still, being built in the United States. If the US wants to increase the capability and capacity of its shipyards, it can do so.

The idea that the US would outsource its naval ship building to another country is insane. It's politically untenable.
 

US eyes India in shipbuilding push against China​

JULY 23, 2026
Washington, July 24 (SocialNews.XYZ) India has emerged as a potential strategic partner in the United States' effort to counter China's dominance in global shipbuilding, with congressional witnesses identifying New Delhi alongside Japan and South Korea as part of a long-term allied strategy to diversify maritime industrial capacity away from Beijing.

The issue came into focus during a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific, where lawmakers and experts warned that China's overwhelming control of commercial shipbuilding has become both an economic and national security challenge for the United States and its allies.

Japan and South Korea were repeatedly described as America's principal partners because of their established shipbuilding industries. At the same time, India was singled out as an emerging player capable of contributing to a broader allied maritime network.

Matthew Funaiole, Vice President at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), said the United States should work "with allies and partners like South Korea and Japan as well as others -- India is a new entry into the shipbuilding game as well -- to both align on long-term objectives and then also to build up allied capacity at scale outside of China."

The hearing, titled Charting a New Course: Countering China's Dominance in Global Shipbuilding, examined what lawmakers described as Beijing's state-backed expansion of commercial shipbuilding and its implications for global supply chains, military logistics and Indo-Pacific security.

Opening the hearing, Subcommittee Chair Young Kim said China now controls more than half of the world's commercial shipbuilding capacity, while the United States accounts for less than one-tenth of one per cent.

She argued that China's commercial success directly strengthens its naval capabilities because commercial and military shipbuilding operate together under Beijing's industrial strategy.

"Our domestic shipyards are backlogged, understaffed, and structurally fragile," Kim said. "Every dollar a Western company spends to build a commercial vessel in a Chinese shipyard directly subsidises the People's Liberation Army Navy."

Ranking Democrat Ami Bera agreed that rebuilding American shipbuilding capacity would require close cooperation with allies.

"The beauty is though; China is doing this alone," Bera said. "We have allies that we can do this with." He specifically referred to Japan and South Korea while discussing investments, technology and workforce cooperation.

Witnesses repeatedly argued that the United States should not attempt to compete with China on its own.

Funaiole cautioned that matching China ship for ship was unrealistic. Instead, he recommended greater transparency into China's maritime industry, investment in high-value maritime technologies and coordinated industrial planning with allies over several decades.

He noted that replacing China's dominance "is not something that's going to be easily replaced, and it's not something the US can address overnight."

Brent Sadler of the Heritage Foundation called for creating a "maritime group of nations" bringing together countries including Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Greece and potentially Taiwan to coordinate shipbuilding, trade and technology policies.

Lawmakers also discussed using tariffs, port fees, sanctions and export controls to reduce dependence on Chinese shipyards, while encouraging investment by allied companies in American shipbuilding facilities.

China currently produces more than half of the world's commercial shipbuilding output, while the United States accounts for only a tiny fraction of global production, according to testimony presented during the hearing. Witnesses warned that China's commercial shipbuilding base also supports its rapidly expanding naval fleet through what they described as a military-civil fusion model.

 
If the US wants to increase the capability and capacity of its shipyards, it can do so.
How? Shipbuilding industry requires a massive complex supply chain and large skilled workforce, shipyards are just a part of the whole ecosystem, even South Korea deeps on China's supply chain to build their ships.


South Korea's Shipbuilding's Spring Illusion: Backbone Collapses​

 
So, if that's the case of outsourcing overseas all together, US naval industrial power and eventually naval power will be a joke.
 
So, if that's the case of outsourcing overseas all together, US naval industrial power and eventually naval power will be a joke.
LOl, if US tries to outsources the building of the navy ships to India, they should first check the speed that India builds its own battleships.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ety

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top