US lawmakers pass resolution supporting democracy in Pakistan with overwhelming majority

ghazi52

Think Tank Analyst
Mar 21, 2007
113,903
165,043
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

US lawmakers pass resolution supporting democracy in Pakistan with overwhelming majority

Anwar Iqbal
June 26, 2024

In a significant display of bipartisan support, the US House of Representatives has passed a resolution expressing robust support for democracy in Pakistan by an overwhelming 368-7 vote.

Lawmakers supporting resolution HR 901, titled ‘Expressing support for democracy and human rights in Pakistan’, claimed that the approval highlighted the United States’ commitment to promoting democratic values globally.

The resolution — passed with 85 per cent of House members participating and 98pc voting in its favour — urged US President Joe Biden to collaborate with Pakistan in upholding democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

It emphasised the importance of free and fair elections, calling for a thorough and independent investigation into any claims of interference or irregularities in Pakistan’s 2024 elections.

HR 901 also condemned efforts to suppress democratic participation in Pakistan. It specifically denounced harassment, intimidation, violence, arbitrary detention, and restrictions on internet access, as well as any violations of human, civil, or political rights.

The decisive vote underscored the House’s commitment to supporting democratic institutions and human rights in Pakistan, marking a notable moment in US foreign policy.

Congressman Rich McCormick, a Georgia Republican, sponsored the resolution. Congressman Daniel Kildee, a Democrat from Michigan, co-sponsored it. The original resolution was introduced in the House on Nov 30, 2023 and the text was amended on June 18 this year.

Michael Kugelman, a scholar of South Asian Affairs at Washington’s Wilson Center, said that the resolution will not have much impact on the Biden administration’s policy toward Pakistan as the administration itself has called for an investigation into election irregularities.

“But the vote does raise questions about what additional legislation we could see regarding Pakistan,” he added.

The passage electrified Imran’s supporters in the US, who clogged social media with their comments. The PTI also shared the development on X.

One of them, who identified himself only as ‘Bol Kay lab Azad’, wrote: “It indicates that US lawmakers oppose the State Department’s endeavors to bring about regime change and promote tyranny globally.”

Another, who identified himself as a ‘Musketeer’, wrote that the resolution will not have much of an impact “unless implemented through the IMF”.

Another, who identified himself as ‘IK Forever’ wanted to know “if the resolution would now be put before the US Senate?”

Yet another commentator, who claimed to be a ‘Reformer’, suggested “translating HR 901 into financial and travel sanctions” on the Pakistani government, its supporters, and sponsors.

The text of the amended resolution:

Expressing support for democracy and human rights in Pakistan.

Whereas Pakistan is an important and valued partner of the United States;

Whereas, on December 10, 1948, Pakistan became one of the original signatories to, and supported the creation of, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR);

Whereas, on June 23, 2010, Pakistan ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);

Whereas, following the end of the most recent period of military rule in 2008, Pakistan completed its first peaceful transition of power between civilian governments led by different political parties in 2013, but the military continues to exert undue influence on the politics of the country;

Whereas, during previous elections, most recently in 2018, election monitors expressed concern about constraints on the freedom of expression and freedom of association and noted allegations of influence by the military-led establishment on the electoral process;

Whereas the Department of State’s Country Report on Human Rights Practices has often highlighted significant human rights issues in Pakistan across multiple years, including unlawful, arbitrary, and extrajudicial killings, forced disappearance and arbitrary detention by the state or its agents, the taking of political prisoners, serious restrictions on free expression and media, and substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association;

Whereas, on April 9, 2022, the National Assembly voted to remove Imran Khan as Prime Minister through a vote of no-confidence motion;

Whereas, on August 10, 2023, President Arif Alvi dissolved Pakistan’s National Assembly on the advice of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to allow for new elections, although the Election Commission of Pakistan subsequently announced the postponement of elections until February 2024 to redraw constituencies of the National Assembly to reflect the 2023 Census;

Whereas, on September 1, 2023, caretaker Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar said the Government was committed to safeguarding and upholding the rights of all its citizens, and that the Government would provide constitutional continuity till the next general elections are held in the country;

Whereas, on February 8, 2024, millions of Pakistanis participated in Pakistan’s general election, with record numbers of women, youth, and members of religious and ethnic minority groups registered to vote;

Whereas Pakistan’s 2024 general election was marked by allegations by credible international and local observers of interference in the electoral process, including electoral violence, intimidation, arrest of political actors, restrictions to freedom of assembly, restrictions on freedom of expression, and restrictions on access to the internet and telecommunications;

Whereas, on February 9, 2024, the Department of State noted that it shared the assessment of observers that the election included undue restrictions on freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, condemned electoral violence as well as restrictions on the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and called for the full investigation of fraud or interference in Pakistan’s general elections;

Whereas the Constitution of Pakistan states that the Federal Government shall have control and command of the Armed Forces, and the oath taken by members of the Armed Forces swears they will uphold the Constitution and not engage in any political activities;

Whereas an essential safeguard of democracy is civilian command and control of apolitical military and security forces; and

Whereas democracy, development, rule of law, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms are interdependent and mutually reinforcing: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) affirms its strong support for democracy in Pakistan, including free and fair elections reflecting the will of the people of Pakistan;

(2) calls on the President and the Secretary of State to strengthen engagement with the Government of Pakistan to ensure democracy, human rights, and the rule of law are upheld;

(3) urges the Government of Pakistan to uphold democratic and electoral institutions, human rights, and the rule of law, and respect the fundamental guarantees of due process, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech of the people of Pakistan;

(4) condemns attempts to suppress the people of Pakistan’s participation in their democracy, including through harassment, intimidation, violence, arbitrary detention, restrictions on access to the internet and telecommunications, or any violation of their human, civil, or political rights;

(5) condemns any effort to subvert the political, electoral, or judicial processes of Pakistan; and

(6) urges the full and independent investigation of claims of interference or irregularities in Pakistan’s February 2024 election.
 

ghazi52

Think Tank Analyst
Mar 21, 2007
113,903
165,043
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
1719404009104.png
 

Developereo

Elite Member
Jul 31, 2009
15,777
18,130
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Do the Germans care if the US Congress approves of their election?
Do the French care if the US Congress approves of their election?
Do the Chinese care if the US Congress approves of their election?
Do the Indians care if the US Congress approves of their election?

The inferiority complex runs deeply in some Pakistanis.
 

VCheng

RETIRED MOD
Sep 19, 2010
52,747
44,283
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
May be it is time to let this dead horse lie in peace without beating it up any further given all that has happened since then. The world seems to have moved on just fine without IK, it seems to me.
 

airwolf137

Full Member
Feb 24, 2011
112
161
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
May be it is time to let this dead horse lie in peace without beating it up any further given all that has happened since then. The world seems to have moved on just fine without IK, it seems to me.
Just Fine? I don't know what you mean by fine but brining the economy to a grinding halt, imprisoning thousands of political workers, biggest political party destroyed, properties confiscated, businesses destroyed, families threatened and all in the name of Khan, if this seems fine to you I don't know what you consider as troublesome.
 

VCheng

RETIRED MOD
Sep 19, 2010
52,747
44,283
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Just Fine? I don't know what you mean by fine but brining the economy to a grinding halt, imprisoning thousands of political workers, biggest political party destroyed, properties confiscated, businesses destroyed, families threatened and all in the name of Khan, if this seems fine to you I don't know what you consider as troublesome.

That is just the Pakistani system working as it is designed to work. What the puppet head looks like at any given moment is immaterial, whether it is IK or SS or the next fool to be given that role, for as long as needed, to be taken away whenever it is decided. What seems to be the problem here?
 

airwolf137

Full Member
Feb 24, 2011
112
161
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
No problem for you, no problem for me, for all I care, the establishment can just kill Khan right now and be done with him... easy peasy.... but to mention misery of millions of people as just fine is a dishonesty in itself. You can put your hatred for Khan aside.
 

VCheng

RETIRED MOD
Sep 19, 2010
52,747
44,283
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
No problem for you, no problem for me, for all I care, the establishment can just kill Khan right now and be done with him... easy peasy.... but to mention misery of millions of people as just fine is a dishonesty in itself. You can put your hatred for Khan aside.

Where have I expressed any hatred for IK? Personal preferences aside, what you have described is merely the Pakistan system at work, as designed and intended. What figurehead is sitting in the chair at any given moment is immaterial. IK's turn came and went, just like SS's will as well, just like all the other fools before them, one and all.
 

JaneBhiDoYaaron

Full Member
Jul 15, 2015
1,450
918
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Do the Germans care if the US Congress approves of their election?
Do the French care if the US Congress approves of their election?
Do the Chinese care if the US Congress approves of their election?
Do the Indians care if the US Congress approves of their election?

The inferiority complex runs deeply in some Pakistanis.
Opposition in each nation will care except China has no opposition.
 

koolio

Member
Dec 11, 2023
51
73
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Umm after all it was Bajwa that got American support to dethrone IK government, it seems uncle Sam's love affair with general Asim munir is not going down well.
 

ghazi52

Think Tank Analyst
Mar 21, 2007
113,903
165,043
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

National Assembly passes resolution against US call to probe Feb 8 polls​


pml n mna shaista pervaiz malik tabling a resolution in national assembly on friday photo pid

Shaista Pervaiz Malik tables resolution, says such interference was inappropriate and unbecoming of global powers

The National Assembly on Thursday overwhelmingly approved a resolution condemning a recent resolution by the United States House of Representatives while called to probe the February 8 elections.

The resolution, introduced by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) member Shaista Pervaiz Malik, criticised the US resolution passed on June 25. Malik stated that the American resolution displayed a complete ignorance of Pakistan's electoral process.

"The House takes notice of the resolution passed by the US House of Representatives concerning Pakistan," Malik declared during the session.

Malik argued that such interference in Pakistan's internal affairs was inappropriate and unbecoming of global powers. "This kind of meddling in our country's internal matters is unacceptable," she said. "It is not appropriate for any global power to interfere in the internal affairs of another country."

Amid opposition uproar, Malik responded by highlighting the global violations of human rights. "Just as we condemn human rights violations around the world, we should denounce this interference," she asserted.

"It is shameful that Pakistan's sovereignty is under attack and some among us are encouraging this assault. It is regrettable that foreign powers are meddling in our internal matters, and we must deter them," Malik added.

Malik urged everyone to condemn these actions. "We should all denounce these steps, but some are supporting foreign interference, which questions our nation's sovereignty."

Shagufta Jumani remarked, "Those supporting this have no right to call themselves Pakistanis. This is our country, and they should stop interfering." Meanwhile, opposition members chanted, "Cipher, cipher, shame, shame."

Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar on Thursday announced that the government would introduce a resolution in the National Assembly in response to the one passed by the US House of Representatives a day earlier expressing “robust support” for democracy in Pakistan.

Responding to the Sunni Ittehad Council MNAs who pointed out the US legislation during the budget session, the deputy premier stressed the need to express the country’s sovereignty and unity.

On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives passed a resolution with a staggering majority of 98%, calling for a “full and independent investigation of claims of interference or irregularities in Pakistan’s February 2024 election”.

A total of 368 members voted in favour of the resolution against only seven opposing it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Top