US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War

[Davey Crockett]

@HAIDER

Netanyahu offered to solve Iranians' water crisis. But here's what it trickles down to | Opinion

For Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Iran's Drought Is Less of a Humanitarian Problem to Be Addressed, and More Opportunity for Israel to Position Itself as the Indispensable Solution

www.haaretz.com

Yes, water rights is a significant issue.

 

[gambit]

Militarily US is winning now and eventually but politically it is losing the war. It's losing its allies in NATO and elsewhere like the ME which is taking the brunt of the Iranian retaliation.

Will those 'allies' change to enemies? Let me guess, YOU believe the Luftwaffe will fly from Iranian bases against the US?

 

[mythbuster]

Militarily US is winning now and eventually but politically it is losing the war. It's losing its allies in NATO and elsewhere like the ME which is taking the brunt of the Iranian retaliation.

As Mao said ! Power grows from the barrel of the gun , as long as America has the bigger gun , politics after throwing tantrums will fall in line

 

[东风夜放花千树]

As Mao said ! Power grows from the barrel of the gun , as long as America has the bigger gun , politics after throwing tantrums will fall in line

My friend, your understanding is not accurate.

The meaning of this sentence is: establishing a regime requires fighting; negotiations and demonstrations cannot solve the problem. Because vested interests will not give up their benefits, and aggressors will equally not stop their acts of aggression.

Chairman Mao asked everyone to abandon illusions about vested interests and aggressors, and not to expect negotiations to completely resolve the problem. We must thoroughly resolve the decadent vested interests and shameless aggressors through fighting.

Nowadays, the meaning of this sentence is often used when other countries interfere in China's internal affairs and territory, and we would say: abandon illusions, prepare for battle.

 

[Aziqbal]

Iran 'closed' the strait, not thru any form of authority, ie legal, means, but thru military methods. In any war, the enemy will ALWAYS be able to do 'something' that you missed or failed to compensate for. But that does not change the fact that you have overwhelming success over his forces.

Yeah a $1 trillion military just “forgot “ that one of the most important waterways could be closed

They just happened to “miss” that part

If you believe that you also believe USS liberty wasn’t a false flag

 

[gambit]

Yeah a $1 trillion military just “forgot “ that one of the most important waterways could be closed

They just happened to “miss” that part

If you believe that you also believe USS liberty wasn’t a false flag

Yes, we are incompetent.

 

[Fatman17]

Will those 'allies' change to enemies? Let me guess, YOU believe the Luftwaffe will fly from Iranian bases against the US?

I believe what I see and read. At the end of the day it will be difficult to trust the US as quoted by a retired US General.

 

[gambit]

I believe what I see and read. At the end of the day it will be difficult to trust the US as quoted by a retired US General.

What is political do not always translate to military. So how many potential former NATO members can Iran expect to fight against the US?

 

[Fatman17]

What is political do not always translate to military. So how many potential former NATO members can Iran expect to fight against the US?

None. But I'm talking about US relationship with it's allies. Iran is on its own.

 

[The SC]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Watandar]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Literally grasping at straws. $1 trillion spent on the defence racket every year and this is what he is hoping will make Iran bend the knee.

 

[The SC]

Trump: Iran knows what we want from the agreement, otherwise there is no point in holding a new round of negotiations

@AlArabiya_Brk

 

[KingQamaR]

A blockade is an act of war, and if in a war, I can invade land, certainly I will not respect territorial waters. But the US can do more and more precise. We can damage the dock equipment to the point that the oil workers will have to resort to handpumps.

This is what eventually lead Japan to attack Pearl Harbour… Blockades, are acts of war.

 

[Falcon29]

We as Americans are still confused as to what objectives the current Trump led administration are trying to achieve in this war

^^

This is the opinion of majority of American public

 

[BHAN85]

Militarily US is winning now and eventually but politically it is losing the war. It's losing its allies in NATO and elsewhere like the ME which is taking the brunt of the Iranian retaliation.

USA is not losing allies, they are deliberately dropping allies.

"Lose" is like if it was a decision of allies, none of that happened.

It's USA telling them go to h3ll.

At least diplomatically.

Still not economically.

But it's a matter of time.