AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
- Thread starter
- #7,366
I question some of that person's posts just as I would any other. I refuse to rely on Twitter feeds and PowerPoint presentations to draw my conclusions. Including posts where some are in perpetual orgasm over all the new munitions contracts that have been awarded.To be fair other than a few over the bias observations that you call out almost immediately and the user who decided to post here I have on ignore kind of a red flagthis user isn’t credible
As you know, I come out of a long career in logistics. Prior to that it was manufacturing. I've been consistent since the orgasms started that it will be many months of not years before those contracts are fulfilled due to lack of capacity today. Here's an excellent example I had intended to post last night:
Site Expansions Underpin Lockheed Martin’s Munitions Production Ramp
Branded Content: Bigger sites, advanced manufacturing techniques, and boosting the workforce are key industry commitments to increased munitions production.
Lockheed-Martin is a huge supplier to the US defense industry. Read the article. You too will see what is missing: how long it will take for that additional capacity to be on line for increased manufacturing.
I can give you a hint: a minimum of 18-24 months. 36 months is not unfeasible.

