US Political News and Trump’s China visit

Yeah, as I said before, this is the second time in this week the government had shut down 2A, there were a case SCOTUS just ruled 9:0 on behalf of the government agianst a person who had shot by LEO and have his gun confiscated when the LE enter his home without a warrant and that's because someone (I think it's the wife) call 911 and said the guy is about to commit suicide.

Guns right group already not liking that because they think it's 2A infringement and appalled that Trump stacked SCOTUS would rule this (they were thinking a 6:3 toward the person) 2A group was already on edge, and now this....
The Dem leadership seems like controlled opposition, because if they were smart about it, they could set the message, for the post Trump years. Trump has decimate the Republican Party and its platform. The Dems think they have this in the bag but young people don’t reflectively vote for them because Trump promises something and dems look like they just sit around.

Dems need their own project 2025 style platform that appeals to independents, not centrists, and finds a way to energize and mobilize the base.
 
I have a feeling that Trump may start war with Iran to divert attention from all these protests within America, bombing Middle east is perfect distraction for American not so Azaad Media.
 
The Dem leadership seems like controlled opposition, because if they were smart about it, they could set the message, for the post Trump years. Trump has decimate the Republican Party and its platform. The Dems think they have this in the bag but young people don’t reflectively vote for them because Trump promises something and dems look like they just sit around.

Dems need their own project 2025 style platform that appeals to independents, not centrists, and finds a way to energize and mobilize the base.
This is what I am afraid of, people (especially you know who) keep saying I am a Democrat, but really, I am not, I am against Trump because he is pushing us into a Dem version of Project 2025, only that this is not going to be for the same thing, and this would most likely a "Chinese Style" political take over if the Dem had a plan similar to Project 2025, and Trump is basically handing it to the Dem while dismentling the guardrail to do the thing most of the Dem always wanted to do, being a centralised progressive state.

This is the reason why I left the US in the first place during Obama 2, because what I saw with Obama was that he is basically pushing an agenda we don't need into us, and if I think Obama is bad, I wouldn't even want to open the book of Dems' own Project 2025.

But I don't see any way we can avoid this unless the Dem is really that inept and cannot captialise the situation where Trump is basically dumping GOP stock to the American people. I was hoping for a more centrist approach to this to bring down the heat a bit, but it seems like this is now nothing but a pipe dream.
 
Last edited:
The dude got executed by a skittish ice agent who panicked after hearing gun. If u so easy to scare, maybe shouldn't be playing with guns.
Maybe the deceased should have thought it through a little more before taking a loaded gun, with extra magazines, and no ID, to a protest, and then proceed to get in the way of law enforcement.

One of the cop shows I watch on Friday and Saturday nights; numerous times the cops will be detaining someone and will find a hidden gun the detainee didn't say anything about/ More often that not, overwhelming force in taking down the detainee while removing the gun.
 
Maybe the deceased should have thought it through a little more before taking a loaded gun, with extra magazines, and no ID, to a protest, and then proceed to get in the way of law enforcement.

One of the cop shows I watch on Friday and Saturday nights; numerous times the cops will be detaining someone and will find a hidden gun the detainee didn't say anything about/ More often that not, overwhelming force in taking down the detainee while removing the gun.
Irrelevant, subject was disarmed and then killed.
 
"Documentaries", yeah, right. :D

(Or more like wet dreams of certain factions globally, and amply represented on PDF?)
Why would you say globally?
That is burying the head in the sand figuratively when elected representatives from the GoP were openly making statements of civil war post Jan 6.
 

WHO statement on notification of withdrawal of the United States​


As a founding member of the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States of America has contributed significantly to many of WHO’s greatest achievements, including the eradication of smallpox, and progress against many other public health threats including polio, HIV, Ebola, influenza, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, antimicrobial resistance, food safety and more.

WHO therefore regrets the United States’ notification of withdrawal from WHO – a decision that makes both the United States and the world less safe. The notification of withdrawal raises issues that will be considered by the WHO Executive Board at its regular meeting starting on 2 February and by the World Health Assembly at its annual meeting in May 2026.

WHO takes note of statements from the government of the United States that say WHO has “trashed and tarnished” and insulted it, and compromised its independence. The reverse is true. As we do with every Member State, WHO has always sought to engage with the United States in good faith, with full respect for its sovereignty.

In its statements, the United States cited as one of the reasons for its decision, “WHO failures during the COVID-19 pandemic”, including “obstructing the timely and accurate sharing of critical information” and that WHO “concealed those failures”. While no organization or government got everything right, WHO stands by its response to this unprecedented global health crisis. Throughout the pandemic, WHO acted quickly, shared all information it had rapidly and transparently with the world, and advised Member States on the basis of the best available evidence. WHO recommended the use of masks, vaccines and physical distancing, but at no stage recommended mask mandates, vaccine mandates or lockdowns. We supported sovereign governments to make decisions they believed were in the best interests of their people, but the decisions were theirs.

Immediately after receiving the first reports of a cluster of cases of “pneumonia of unknown cause” in Wuhan, China on 31 December 2019, WHO asked China for more information and activated its emergency incident management system. By the time the first death was reported from China on 11 January 2020, WHO had already alerted the world through formal channels, public statements and social media, convened global experts, and published comprehensive guidance for countries on how to protect their populations and health systems. When the WHO Director-General declared COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern under the International Health Regulations on 30 January 2020 – the highest level of alarm under international health law – outside of China there were fewer than 100 reported cases, and no reported deaths.

In the first weeks and months of the pandemic, the Director-General urged all countries repeatedly to take immediate action to protect their populations, warning that “the window of opportunity is closing”, “this is not a drill” and describing COVID-19 as “public enemy number one”.

In response to the multiple reviews of the COVID-19 pandemic, including of WHO’s performance, WHO has taken steps to strengthen its own work, and to support countries to bolster their own pandemic preparedness and response capacities. The systems we developed and managed before, during and after the emergency phase of the pandemic, and which run 24/7, have contributed to keeping all countries safe, including the United States.

The United States also said in its statements that WHO has “pursued a politicized, bureaucratic agenda driven by nations hostile to American interests”. This is untrue. As a specialized agency of the United Nations, governed by 194 Member States, WHO has always been and remains impartial and exists to serve all countries, with respect for their sovereignty, and without fear or favour.

WHO appreciates the support and continued engagement of all its Member States, which continue to work within the framework of WHO to pursue solutions to the world’s biggest health threats, both communicable and noncommunicable. Most notably, WHO Member States last year adopted the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which once ratified will become a landmark instrument of international law to keep the world safer from future pandemics. Member States are now negotiating an annex to the WHO Pandemic Agreement, the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system, which if adopted will promote rapid detection and sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential, and equitable and timely access to vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.

We hope that in the future, the United States will return to active participation in WHO. Meanwhile, WHO remains steadfastly committed to working with all countries in pursuit of its core mission and constitutional mandate: the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right for all people.
 
Why would you say globally?
That is burying the head in the sand figuratively when elected representatives from the GoP were openly making statements of civil war post Jan 6.

Yes, and there is still no civil war. Many wish it would, fervently, but they will all be disappointed. The next three years will not be easy, but USA will come out of it just fine, and even stronger, dare I say it.

This is far more political posturing than real substance, and that is why I remain convinced of my position on this matter.
 
Yes, and there is still no civil war. Many wish it would, fervently, but they will all be disappointed. The next three years will not be easy, but USA will come out of it just fine, and even stronger, dare I say it.

This is far more political posturing than real substance, and that is why I remain convinced of my position on this matter.
I think that the "come out strong" is strongly dependent on the replacement of the democrat leadership. Not some guarantee.
 
New York City:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Los Angeles:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


https://x.com/ dieworkwear/status/2015248165931487361

https://x.com/ EdKrassen/status/2015257888063709345

^Twitter blocked some links, feel free to remove space after "x.com/ "
 
Last edited:
Irrelevant, subject was disarmed and then killed.
Subject was also on the ground, during the process of being disarmed, and surrounded by multiple officers who could have used less than lethal force after being disarmed; more pepper spray, tasers, restraining methods, etc.

Having gotten the opportunity to train with an instructor for the DC police, once the subject is clearly disarmed, use of deadly force is not allowed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbc
I think what struck me about Pretti was that he had an incredibly kind face. I have not researched the man but I have a feeling he was a decent human being. RIP Alex Pretti.
Have you seen the video of the eulogy he gave a veteran at the VA hospital? He was indeed a decent human being from the looks of it. Civic minded individual, who stood up against excess and died in the process of protecting another person, the woman he was trying to help up.

Many of us were raised to say the pledge of allegiance every morning in class. To put civics and morality first, and live by the golden rule.

Allegedly, according to the woman he was trying to save his last words were “Are you okay?”.

What have we come to as a society.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top