RabzonKhan
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #8,911
US Political News and Trump’s China visit
- Thread starter RabzonKhan
- Start date
RabzonKhan
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #8,913
The incident occurred at a public park in Minnesota, where a white woman was filmed calling a Black five-year-old child the N-word. She accused the child of going through her own child’s diaper bag. When confronted by a bystander, the man who recorded the video, she justified her use of the slur, saying, "If that’s what he’s going to act like."
The child, who is autistic and of Somali heritage, was visibly distressed. She repeated the slur multiple times while making obscene gestures in the video.
Following the viral video, she launched a fundraiser on a Christian crowdfunding platform, claiming she needed to relocate her family for safety reasons, despite there being no reports of any threats against her. It looks like a money-grabbing scam to me. The fundraiser raised over seven hundred thousand dollars, attracting support from individuals espousing white nationalist and far-right rhetoric.
My point of view is that even if the child had done what she accused him of, there is absolutely no justification for using such a slur against a five-year-old. This kind of behavior is despicable and shameless. Even more troubling is the fact that people raised money for her and supported her actions, effectively encouraging obnoxious behavior.
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
To me, just looking at the photo, she is white trash. Worse, she is teaching her own child that sort of behavior is acceptable.
On the flip side of the coin, how much money has Karmelo Anthony raised for his defense for stabbing a white kid in the heart? It's now over $525K. Not only that, he and his family have gone into hiding over unsubstantiated claims against their safety.
On the flip side of the coin, how much money has Karmelo Anthony raised for his defense for stabbing a white kid in the heart? It's now over $525K. Not only that, he and his family have gone into hiding over unsubstantiated claims against their safety.
RabzonKhan
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #8,915
I appreciate your perspective and historical references. I am still a student, and as I continue to read about American history, I find that all the references you provided are absolutely correct. I truly appreciate your honesty.
At the moment, I am a bit busy with the stock market. I used to be an investor, but Trump’s erratic behavior, policies, and statements have disrupted the market. As a result, I have shifted from investing to trading. In this unpredictable market, long-term investments have become risky, and the only way to make money is through short-term trades. I am playing with a small amount of money, using tight stop-loss strategies, because you never know what new statement will come from the White House and shake things up.
I will definitely share my point of view, as I strongly believe that today’s Democratic Party is not the party of the 1960s. I hope you enjoy reading.
Lol
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
Biden has been on the wrong side of every issue for 50+ years. For someone who boldly (stupidly) stated he's the only one to go toe-to-toe with Putin, he sure showed Putin a thing or two in resolving this conflict, didn't he?
Even Obama himself said "don't underestimate Joe's ability to eff things up".
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
Thank you sir. Appreciate your not conflating our personal petty differences with your pursuit to obtain the truth.I appreciate your perspective and historical references. I am still a student, and as I continue to read about American history, I find that all the references you provided are absolutely correct. I truly appreciate your honesty.
At the moment, I am a bit busy with the stock market. I used to be an investor, but Trump’s erratic behavior, policies, and statements have disrupted the market. As a result, I have shifted from investing to trading. In this unpredictable market, long-term investments have become risky, and the only way to make money is through short-term trades. I am playing with a small amount of money, using tight stop-loss strategies, because you never know what new statement will come from the White House and shake things up.
I will definitely share my point of view, as I strongly believe that today’s Democratic Party is not the party of the 1960s. I hope you enjoy reading.
I too am still learning. Imagine my surprise that Carl Vinson, who signed on to the Southern Manifesto, has a carrier named after him.
John Stennis is another. Why?
Remember, it was the left who were in a furor to rename ALL military installations that were named after Confederate leaders? Why? Especially when the Army forgave its most promising leaders at the time for the choices they made.
It's because the left is ashamed of itself. And, rather than confront the reality of what they did to a set of peoples, they chose instead to erase history. Is that to say the names of the people whom the posts are now named for are not as equally deserving? No, not in the least. But to blatantly do away with the history of those whom the posts were originally named is a crime to all.
So why didn't Democrats demand the Stennis and Vinson be renamed?
The names of Benning, Bragg, Hood, and Polk represent some of the finest officers the Army had at the time. If you research carefully, while the North had good officers in its own right, the cream of the officer corps came from the South. Today's Democrats have erased all that to hide their shame.
Erasing history is never wise. Otherwise, we never learn from it.
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
-
-
-
-
Monitoring: internal ethnic tensions & ethno-politics- Latest: Distant_Observer
