USA Deportations news

USA is ridiculously large country only 0.01% is inhabited in city centres

It takes 5-6 hours to travel across by plane

Majority of country is quite calm the idea that massive demographic change is on the way is just absurd

Traditionally there have always been new immigrants coming in to the country , thru some legal process

US Population
340.1 million (2024)

US already has diversified population
  • Natives Tribes(0.01-2%)
  • Blacks
  • Italians (European)
  • Irish
  • English
  • German
  • Mexicans
  • Canadians
  • Mixture of Europeans
  • Koreans
  • Pakistani
  • Chinese (Taiwan, some main land china)
  • Japanese
  • Vietnames
  • Caribbean Islanders (Jamaican, Guyanese Indian)

The talk shows do dominate conspiracy theories on radio and other networks which fuels certain views from time to time

The modern age views of Immigration have been forged due to certain fear of "Illegal Immigration" at uncontrolled borders
  • Illegal Migrants
  • Crime vs Immigrant (Undocumented) rise
  • Strain on health care system
  • Rise of Slum Culture , 10-15 people in 1 home

The situation would be much more controllable if there was a scientific review and advisory board , instead of Radio Talk suggesting future projections for Population

"USA has a vibrant culture of night talk show hosts , Alternative theories , and Pod caster , while i can't say if expressiveness of this media is good or bad it is up to scientist to review. Impact of excessive social media on human behaviour. 24/7 exposure to certain conspiracy theories and pod cast can impact a person's social behaviour. In USA this alternative culture is 24/7 on regional media"


As Corporations will adopt , Artificial Intelligence , unemployment will rise people will be force to blame the rise in Unemployment to immigration as they are physically visible , vs Artificial Intelligence operates behind closed corporate offices


The rise in Poverty in Central America and South America has also forced lot of migrants to seek better life in USA
Which has created a humanitarian crisis across Mexican-USA border , which is also a strong aspect of current trends
 
Last edited:
Cash Jordan
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

800,000 Illegals 'SHIPPED BACK' to Mexico... as California SHUTS DOWN​

 
Davey Crockett said:
VERY GRAPHIC FOOTAGE: A motel manager in Texas was killed and beheaded by a man who the local authorities suspect to be an illegal immigrant.

The video shows the motel manager's head being thrown across the car park area, before it is picked up by the suspect. The killer then calmly walks away with the head.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


www.nbcnews.com

Man accused of beheading Dallas motel manager who told him not to use a broken washing machine

Court documents say the suspect became upset after the manager didn’t speak to him directly about the machine but asked a woman to translate.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

Man accused of beheading Dallas motel manager who told him not to use a broken washing machine​

Cobos-Martinez was released on an order of supervision in January after Cuba "would not accept him because of his criminal history," according to the statement.
Click to expand...



More evidence governments like Cuba are emptying their prisons.

Time to send people to remote islands.
 
How the Vietnam War helped more Indian doctors migrate to the US in 1970s

Meenakshi Ahamed
28 December, 2024 12:00 pm IST

feature-image-42-696x392.jpg

Representational image | A severe doctor shortage arose in the US as the army drained away medical graduates, necessitating doctors from overseas to fill the gap | Wikimedia Commons

When Deepak Chopra, who today is internationally recognized as one of the leaders of the integrative approach to medicine, arrived in New Jersey in 1970 fresh out of medical school in India, he got a firsthand introduction to the situation. “When I walked into the ER for my first shift,” he recalled, “the doctors who showed me my locker and gave me a tour of the acute facilities were not Americans.

There was one German, but the rest had Asian faces like mine, from India, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Korea… What had brought so many foreign doctors together was the Vietnam War. A severe doctor shortage had arisen as the army drained away medical graduates while other young men, who might have wanted to become doctors, were drafted to fight.”

War had added an additional layer of stress on the health care system. During the Vietnam War, the shortage of men in the labor force had become a cause for concern. More than 9 million Americans—mostly men—served on active duty between 1961 and 1975.

Medical personnel were needed in the war effort, adding to the shortage of available doctors for civilians. Thanks to advances in medical care on the frontlines, many more soldiers were surviving their injuries. Seventy-five thousand severely disabled veterans returned to the United States, many of whom would need years of continuing care, increasing the pressure on an already overwhelmed health care system.

theprint.in

How the Vietnam War helped more Indian doctors migrate to the US in 1970s

In 'Indian Genius', Meenakshi Ahamed provides fascinating portraits of Indian Americans who started the wave of success stories abroad.
theprint.in theprint.in
 
Report on Fox Chicago affiliate of an incident in Franklin Park, Illinois. Franklin Park is a 'burb of Chicago. ICE agent attempt to arrest an illegal alien. Illegal took off dragging the agent. Agen eventually shot and killed the suspect at the intersection of 25th Ave. & Grand.

That intersection is less than 2 miles from my Chicago office. I know that area very well.
 
Skukuza said:
The global village is ending. Nationalism is starting to become the order of the day. You seem to be fine with nationalism in your country. Boasting about India's growth. I noticed many Indian members here complain about neighbours whose citizens come to India seeking work. Yet you wish away the jobs of Europeans in favour of Indians. Hypocrisy much? Times are changing. Boats and bobbling head Indians will be returned to their countries
Click to expand...

Indians and Pakistanis are pouring into the west by the millions every year. This has been going on since 2020.

It is starting to dilute the British Asians and this becomes a big problem with cohesion between the brits.

In some areas its literally refugees and Indians fresh off the boat.

British asians are being tarred with the same brush. It's actually tragic what's happened.

Why did they have to allow so many? Immigration is ok as long as its well managed.
 
@j_hungary, I was reading an article, the Supreme Court has given the go-ahead to racially profile suspects, I believe it stemmed from a case filed in California.
 
www.newsweek.com

Appeals court overturns ruling that blocked deportation of 500,000 migrants

An appeals court ruled on Friday that the Trump administration can begin deporting around half a million immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

Appeals Court Overturns Ruling That Blocked Deportation of 500,000 Migrants​


An appeals court ruled on Friday that the Trump administration can begin deporting around 500,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

Newsweek reached out to the White House and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) via email on Friday evening for comment.

Why It Matters​

DHS ordered half a million migrants to self-deport, issuing termination notices to nationals of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who had entered the country under "humanitarian parole" programs that started under the administration of former President Joe Biden.

This marked the first mass revocation of humanitarian parole, according to the Associated Press (AP).

The initial effort affected over 500,000 migrants across the nation, and DHS advised that those who did not leave voluntarily "may be subject to enforcement actions, including but not limited to detention and removal, without an opportunity to make personal arrangements and return to your country in an orderly manner."

The Supreme Court in May issued a single-paragraph decision, unsigned, that granted a stay against an initial order issued by a judge that halted the deportations pending a decision in appeals court. Democrat-appointed Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.

What To Know​

Today's two-page decision lifts a district judge's ruling that blocked the Trump administration from canceling the "humanitarian parole" programs.

The administration sought to continue its deportations while the legal question played out in courts, which the initial order blocked.

Following the Supreme Court's decision, the administration urged the appeals court to make a similar decision, writing in a brief that "the Secretary's discretionary rescission of a discretionary benefit should have been the end of the matter."

The three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston delivered a final decision Friday evening. Immigrants who entered the U.S. under the program will now lose their permits to work and are at immediate risk of deportation.

"We recognize the risks of irreparable harm persuasively laid out in the district court's order: that parolees who lawfully arrived in this country were suddenly forced to choose between leaving in less than a month — a choice that potentially includes being separated from their families, communities, and lawful employment and returning to dangers in their home countries," the judges wrote.

"But absent a strong showing of likelihood of success on the merits, the risk of such irreparable harms cannot, by itself, support a stay," they added.

Lawyers for plaintiffs maintain the district court that issued the initial block "applied the law correctly and did not abuse its discretion."
 
TPS was granted to these people via EO. It stands to reason TPS can be revoked once their period of TPS expires. Therefore, they are subject to deportation.

The lower courts that issued the ruling revoking the ending of TPS are acting out of judicial activism and not in alignment with the law.
 
PakFactor said:
@j_hungary, I was reading an article, the Supreme Court has given the go-ahead to racially profile suspects, I believe it stemmed from a case filed in California.
Click to expand...
Yes.

and that will eat into the 5th amendment right, because the next time cops start racial profiling people, and they sue, the admin can raise this argument and since this is how the Supreme Court ruled in this line, that set a precedent, which mean they are going to have to rule in favor of the next racial profiling or they would have to admit this ruling was wrong. Because it's the same.
 
@PakFactor

This guy explained the entire case that led to the Supreme Court essentially throwing the limitation of Racial profiling out the window.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


And if you don't speak legalese, my wife explained this to me in a more subtle way.

Essentially, the case originated from three immigrants who were stopped at a bus stop in California while waiting for a bus. An ICE agent then proceeded to detain and transport the three into an immigration holding facility without any reason given. The three immigrants then sue the government for an injunction (a writ to stop what the government is doing), and the case makes it to the Supreme Court's shadow docket. (which means SCOTUS opined on but did not pick up the case)

SCOTUS states that the stop is legal because it runs on four principles that the Trump administration stated in the brief.

1.) The person(s) involved are mexican in descent
2.) The location is at the border
3.) They speak English with an accent
4.) They were involved in a low-paying job.

Those four reasons were enough, according to SCOTUS, to stop the three individuals waiting at a bus stop. Bear in mind, none of the 4 are actual crimes, or the process of committing a crime (that is, being Latino itself, being at the border itself, working at a low-paying job itself, and speaking with an accent itself is not a crime, nor was it a reason to commit a crime. But when the four were satisfied, it became a probable cause, basically just because someone is Latino. At this point, I should point out that there are roughly 25% of American Citizens who are Latino (IIRC 66 million out of 330). The court opined that the damage to people who are not illegal is minimal and unlikely to be repeated.

This works on anything race-related, and you can declare an emergency on, you can stereotype Asians as hackers and racially profile any Asian near a computer. Or you can make it to stereotyping Black people as armed robbers and radically profiling any Black person near a store or bank.

Why is it a bad thing?

Think about it like this: if a Democratic administration issues an executive order and declares White supremacy a national emergency. That administration outlines four points that make it legal to detain and seize individuals to combat white supremacists. Those 4 points are

1.) They are white people
2.)Having a tattooo
3.) Located in the Southern US.
4.) Working in a low-paying job or not working at all.

So, according to the same SCOTUS brief on racial profiling, those are legitimate conditions because a white supremacist has to be white and probably very heavily tattooed and usually lives in the Southern United States and has been working in a low-paying job or did not hold any job, because that bill fits the majority of white supremacists. (like Aryan Nation, Neo Nazi, and so on) and so the cops can stop you and detain you for a period of time and make sure you are white, but not a white supremacist. Because if you were not, you would be released with no physical harm done, and it would be unlikely to happen again.
 
j_hungary said:
@PakFactor

This guy explained the entire case that led to the Supreme Court essentially throwing the limitation of Racial profiling out the window.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


And if you don't speak legalese, my wife explained this to me in a more subtle way.

Essentially, the case originated from three immigrants who were stopped at a bus stop in California while waiting for a bus. An ICE agent then proceeded to detain and transport the three into an immigration holding facility without any reason given. The three immigrants then sue the government for an injunction (a writ to stop what the government is doing), and the case makes it to the Supreme Court's shadow docket. (which means SCOTUS opined on but did not pick up the case)

SCOTUS states that the stop is legal because it runs on four principles that the Trump administration stated in the brief.

1.) The person(s) involved are mexican in descent
2.) The location is at the border
3.) They speak English with an accent
4.) They were involved in a low-paying job.

Those four reasons were enough, according to SCOTUS, to stop the three individuals waiting at a bus stop. Bear in mind, none of the 4 are actual crimes, or the process of committing a crime (that is, being Latino itself, being at the border itself, working at a low-paying job itself, and speaking with an accent itself is not a crime, nor was it a reason to commit a crime. But when the four were satisfied, it became a probable cause, basically just because someone is Latino. At this point, I should point out that there are roughly 25% of American Citizens who are Latino (IIRC 66 million out of 330). The court opined that the damage to people who are not illegal is minimal and unlikely to be repeated.

This works on anything race-related, and you can declare an emergency on, you can stereotype Asians as hackers and racially profile any Asian near a computer. Or you can make it to stereotyping Black people as armed robbers and radically profiling any Black person near a store or bank.

Why is it a bad thing?

Think about it like this: if a Democratic administration issues an executive order and declares White supremacy a national emergency. That administration outlines four points that make it legal to detain and seize individuals to combat white supremacists. Those 4 points are

1.) They are white people
2.)Having a tattooo
3.) Located in the Southern US.
4.) Working in a low-paying job or not working at all.

So, according to the same SCOTUS brief on racial profiling, those are legitimate conditions because a white supremacist has to be white and probably very heavily tattooed and usually lives in the Southern United States and has been working in a low-paying job or did not hold any job, because that bill fits the majority of white supremacists. (like Aryan Nation, Neo Nazi, and so on) and so the cops can stop you and detain you for a period of time and make sure you are white, but not a white supremacist. Because if you were not, you would be released with no physical harm done, and it would be unlikely to happen again.
Click to expand...


Thanks for explaining in detail.

This is giving me a somber feeling, and I never thought it would get to this point. We are pushing extremes. Many in the Muslim community have a deep fear that they are one act away from being profiled like the Hispanics. With the recent murder of Charlie Kirk, many of my friends and business partners said they were all holding their breath. It wasn't one of us, or they would have started some OP the vibe the Utah governor gave out was that he was hoping it was the other.

I never thought I'd carry my Passport ID or Passport with me at all times, until recently. More so, I worry about the future of my child, due to the way he looks and believes he can be picked on, even while being born here.
 
PakFactor said:
Thanks for explaining in detail.

This is giving me a somber feeling, and I never thought it would get to this point. We are pushing extremes. Many in the Muslim community have a deep fear that they are one act away from being profiled like the Hispanics. With the recent murder of Charlie Kirk, many of my friends and business partners said they were all holding their breath. It wasn't one of us, or they would have started some OP the vibe the Utah governor gave out was that he was hoping it was the other.

I never thought I'd carry my Passport ID or Passport with me at all times, until recently. More so, I worry about the future of my child, due to the way he looks and believes he can be picked on, even while being born here.
Click to expand...
Well, technically, they can already profile muslim, they (The Supreme Court) made it a shadow docket and instead of judging from a case stand point, it opined on the subject matter, which mean the cop can technically do what they said they can do until someone bring a case to challege it all the way to the supreme court, but seeing how they opined on this, don't hold your breath

It wouldn't make any difference whether or not the shooter is muslim or not; if Trump wanted to blame the Muslims, they would find a way. I mean, don't forget Hispanic is THE group that got him elected in 2024, and he literally just turned on them like that. I mean I don;t think at this point they care. Which beg the question, is it because it's Trump 2nd presidency term, that's why they don't care, or is it because they really think there are no more need in voting as he said, that's why they don't care?
 
Candidate for Congress gets tossed on her ass, this is fantastic.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top