Western grand strategy in countering Iran's Islamic revolution

Wahabi is a term invented and used by Shia,
it is like pot calling the kettle black.

The moment you deviate from the Book of the lord,
you are lost and will keep running into logical problems that can not be defended.
 
The Role of Wahhabism and Fabricated Revolutions in Countering the Iranian Revolution

Following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the global balance of power shifted dramatically. Iran emerged as an independent, anti-imperialist power, presenting a new model of governance in the Islamic world that directly challenged the strategic interests of the West (primarily the U.S. and its allies).

To counter this, the West and its regional allies adopted a dual strategy: 1) Strengthening extremist religious movements (Takfiri/Wahhabi) and 2) Supporting proxy wars to drain the resources of Shiite or anti-Western Sunni leaders/nations.

1. Syria: From Civil Unrest to Takfiri Warfare
Syria stands as one of the most prominent examples of a "manufactured transition."
The Transformation: What began as civil protests in 2011 was rapidly transformed into a war of attrition through logistical, military, and financial support from Western powers and regional actors.
The Role of Wahhabi/Salafi Currents: To counter the "Axis of Resistance" and the government of Bashar al-Assad, extremist Takfiri groups were used as "shock troops" on the battlefield. The goal was to use religious extremism to distract the state from its political and strategic priorities.
Strategic Objective: To weaken Syria as a regional player and sever Iran's strategic corridors leading to the Mediterranean.

2. Promoting Wahhabism as a Tool of "Soft War"
After the Iranian Revolution, Western powers realized they could not easily combat revolutionary Islamic models through purely secular means. Instead, they utilized religious currents to counter "Revolutionary Islam":
Replacing the Narrative: Revolutionary, anti-Western Islamic political models were countered by "traditionalist/statist" Islam (Wahhabism). Wahhabism, with its emphasis on 'Takfir' (declaring others infidels), created an environment where any political movement challenging the existing status quo could be labeled as "apostate."
Financing: Massive amounts of capital from Gulf institutions were funneled into schools and mosques in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, and parts of Africa to prevent the spread of revolutionary ideologies.

3. The "Takfiri Belt": Saudi Arabia and Pakistan
During and after the Cold War, cooperation between Western powers and countries with Wahhabi ideologies (like Saudi Arabia) and traditional military structures (like Pakistan) created a belt of paramilitary groups.
Afghanistan: The rise of groups that later became Al-Qaeda was the result of projects designed to counter Soviet influence (and later, to control other Islamic movements). These groups consistently utilized Wahhabi ideology to recruit fighters.

Summary: The Western Strategy against Iran
To summarize, the West has used "fabricated revolutions" or "managed upheavals" through the following methodology:
1. Exploiting Sectarian Divides (Fitna): Using religious differences (Sunni-Shiite) to break Islamic unity against foreign intervention.
2. Utilizing Wahhabi/Salafi Currents: These movements serve as ideal "tools" because their extremist nature allows them to dismantle any independent Islamic political structure that refuses to comply with Western interests.
3. Proxy Warfare: Instead of direct confrontation with Iran, the West has triggered chaos in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen to trap Iran in exhausting, costly, and endless conflicts, thereby depleting its economic and military strength.
Wahabissm was first used against the sunni Ottomans, declared them as kafir, mushriks and declared jihad against them, then billions were pumped to fund this khawarij ideology around the sunni world, challenging and destroying/harming states such as Libya, Algeria, Somalia, Indonesia, Iraq, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Nigeria, Niger, Burkino Faso, Mali, Pakistan etc. You will be surprised to know its not a traditionalist movement but full on moderist reformist movement which collaborates with the western world order. It is a political, religous and financial movement, hates and rejects the historical Islam and wants a new 21st century Islam, so like a western version of Islam. Iran became one of the targets after 1979 revolution. The movement is furture divided in to crazy zombie extremists who wage wars to harm muslim states and once states are destroyed a new modern face is recruited to rule the state. The real sunni Islamic power collapsed with the destruction of the Ottoman and Mughal states.
 
Interesting that this thread dropped while the Makkah Defense Pact is seriously talking with Iran about becoming a member. And by an Iranian member, to boot. Talk about throwing a grenade into the situation.
 
Wahabissm was first used against the sunni Ottomans, declared them as kafir, mushriks and declared jihad against them, then billions were pumped to fund this khawarij ideology around the sunni world, challenging and destroying/harming states such as Libya, Algeria, Somalia, Indonesia, Iraq, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Nigeria, Niger, Burkino Faso, Mali, Pakistan etc. You will be surprised to know its not a traditionalist movement but full on moderist reformist movement which collaborates with the western world order. It is a political, religous and financial movement, hates and rejects the historical Islam and wants a new 21st century Islam, so like a western version of Islam. Iran became one of the targets after 1979 revolution. The movement is furture divided in to crazy zombie extremists who wage wars to harm muslim states and once states are destroyed a new modern face is recruited to rule the state. The real sunni Islamic power collapsed with the destruction of the Ottoman and Mughal states.
I think Sharif of Makkah who rose against the Ottomans was not a Wahabi.
 
I think Sharif of Makkah who rose against the Ottomans was not a Wahabi.
Ottomans were corrupt monarchs just like the Safavids. They were no different, Muslims needed change, an other hijack but from a long time ago. Here an Ottoman memento in Yemen destroyed by Ansarallah
4734813.jpg

It is a Satanic symbol, the famous Obelisk.
 
This is an extremely deluded thread my brother..

Very far from the truth and ground realities...

The So-called Iranian revolutioniaries put themselves in the firing line against the Salafis and not the other way around. They put themselves amidst the firing range and into that conflict out of their free will and it was a war that was not even their own.

Before this there was war on terror which was basically Salafi-US conflicts which is now over and the so-called axis of resistance thought they could benefit from it but every conflict has a beginning and ending. The Americans after 2 decades decided it was over and unwinninable they simply disengaged with diplomacy but the Shia had no ideas or ways to pull out they were deeply entrenched and couldn´t do anything to exit.

Hence they came with all this lies of being revolutionaries or anti-western which is completely bullshxt. Who was fighting side by side with the Russians against the Syrians?. They killed any remaining brotherhood left and nobody buys into their revolutionaries BS. You betrayed them back in 2003 and again 2011 that was the last one before you became an enemy in their eyes.

Calling the salaf´s terrorists or cursing the Sahaba didn´t help either.

2003 and 2011 was the best thing that could have happened it revealed and exposed Hezbollah, revolutionary guards and all their so-called militias. We will target them everywhere they pop up their heads because they have chosen animosity against the Sunnis and the Ummah as whole and not the other way around they broke first the sacred brotherhood blood ties and aqeedah ties.

We have the right to defend ourselves, our rights and religious practices. We will hammer down any fancy attempts like in Bahrain, Eastern Saudi Arabia, Syria, Malaysia, Kuwait, Now Yemen and even in Lebanon if Hezbollah does one mistake it will be a miscalculation we have been waiting we will banish them from Lebanon. THey have to toe the line and never cooperate with our enemies and listen to us.

Besides we do not like to miscalculate, a smart and genius muslim does not launch empty rockets or missiles or start wars based on fantasy but one must only start a conflict a time of his chosing without it being based on miscalculation. You did not contribute anything to the expansion of Islam? You know why because your not about this life and were busy in shrines and grave venerations.. It was done based on timing and calculation. When we say there is no war you listen and when the time is right we say...

Abandon the cheap militias and useless militancy and join the civilized world and trade and build a life and a proud civilization.

Building a great civilzation, trading with the whole world, keeping the navigation waters save and peaceful co-existence with your trading partners is halal and recommanded. Reach your zenith years first
 
Last edited:
I think Sharif of Makkah who rose against the Ottomans was not a Wahabi.
Read the history again, way before Sharif of Makkah a religious political reformist movement rebelled and waged jihad against the Ottomans, fought a few wars and destroyed Makkah Islamlic holy places 1818 and then again 1925. Sharif of Makkah changed sides right at the end when he knew Ottomans were finished 1916.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top