White House to detail plan to safeguard US auto sector, avoid second 'China shock'

Beijingwalker

Elite Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
76,701
Reaction score
104,212
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

White House to detail plan to safeguard US auto sector, avoid second 'China shock'​

By David Shepardson
September 23, 20241:55 PM UTC

J5RRDOQ2JBMQJMTKELMI6HWMF4.jpg

National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard speaks during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S., October 26, 2023. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights

WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) - Top White House economic adviser Lael Brainard will lay out on Monday the Biden administration's broad approach to safeguarding the U.S. auto sector from what it considers China's unfair trade actions.

"China is flooding global markets with a wave of auto exports at a time when they are experiencing overcapacity. We have seen this playbook before in the China shock of the early 2000s that harmed our manufacturing communities," Brainard will say at the Detroit Economic Club, according to prepared remarks seen by Reuters.

"The administration is determined to avoid a second China shock, which means putting safeguards in place before a flood of underpriced Chinese autos undercuts the ability of the U.S. auto sector to compete on the global stage."

She cited one analysis that the Detroit metro area lost more than 55,000 manufacturing jobs due to import competition from China since 2001.
Relatively few Chinese-made cars and trucks are imported into the United States.

The U.S. Commerce Department on Monday proposed prohibiting key Chinese software and hardware in connected vehicles on American roads due to national security concerns, a move that would effectively bar nearly all Chinese cars from entering the U.S. market.

"Americans should drive whatever car they choose – gas powered, hybrid, or electric," Brainard will say. "But, if they choose to drive an EV, we want it to be made in America, not in China."

Brainard's appearance comes as the fate of the auto industry and pressure from China has become a major theme in the 2024 presidential election with the Republican candidate Donald Trump suggesting China could dominate future auto production.

Earlier this month, the Biden administration locked in steep tariff hikes on Chinese imports, including a 100% duty on electric vehicles, to boost protections for strategic industries from China's state-driven industrial practices.

"In order for companies to invest in innovative new designs and models here in America, they need to be assured that their investments won’t be undercut by unfairly underpriced cars from China," Brainard will say.

The White House aims to ensure that Chinese automakers cannot set up factories in Mexico to get around high tariffs.

"China’s overcapacity in EVs will be a major area of focus as we look to the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement mid-term review in 2026," Brainard will say.
 
Lol, we'll see how US could survive this coming tidal wave.
 
The US government wants its citizens to drive EV cars to safeguard the environment, but it will not allow lower-cost EVs to protect the Big 3 and their unions. I guess protecting the environment will come at a cost...to the customer.
 
The US government wants its citizens to drive EV cars to safeguard the environment, but it will not allow lower-cost EVs to protect the Big 3 and their unions. I guess protecting the environment will come at a cost...to the customer.
mark-wahlberg-smh.gif


So what is that import tariff India has on foreign autos again?

I think it is 60 to 100%...

What is the import duty on cars in India? Cars with CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) value over USD 40,000 incur a 100% customs tax, while those under USD 40,000 face a 60% import duty. Used vehicle import tax stands at 125%.

Can you speak instead about what the Indian government wants...maybe it is to keep people on bicycles?
 
Last edited:
mark-wahlberg-smh.gif


So what is that import tariff India has on foreign autos again?

I think it is 60 to 100%...



Can you speak instead about what the Indian government wants...maybe it is to keep people on bicycles?
What's your point? I don't live in India. I've been living in the United States since I was three. I don't care what India's tariffs are.
 
mark-wahlberg-smh.gif


So what is that import tariff India has on foreign autos again?

I think it is 60 to 100%...



Can you speak instead about what the Indian government wants...maybe it is to keep people on bicycles?
Most developing countries have tariffs as their auto industries are not as developed as advance countries like United States, Europe and Japan.
 
Tariffs is a double edge sword. It cuts both ways.

The more you use tariffs to protect local industries, the more uncompetitive its becomes.
 
Tariffs is a double edge sword. It cuts both ways.

The more you use tariffs to protect local industries, the more uncompetitive its becomes.

China had 80% to 100% car tariffs for decades (starting in the 1980's I believe) forcing foreign automakers to do joint ventures. It wasn't until 2006 that they started reducing it to 25%.

So you think it was a failure and Chinese car companies became uncompetitive due to it????

BTW China had car companies since at least the 1950's.

Founded: 15 July 1953; 71 years ago
 
Last edited:
Basically US can't swallow another defeat from China! It will deprive its citizens of economical cars to drive, just to protect a few big companies and their profits! So much for open trade, capitalism and free economy!

Cellphones, drones and now cars! These are signs of defeat! Unfortunately!
 
Tariffs never worked, not a single successful case in the history.
 
China is the world biggest car market by a huge margin , accounting for over fifth of the global market, if US bans Chinese cars, China will reciprocate, US government is not helping US auto industry, it's killing it.

微信图片_20240924105143.png
 
Or maybe US government doesn't care, it's automobile industry has been dying anyway, with or without the Chinese market. This country used to be called " a nation of cars" barely 2 decades ago, it shows how mindblowingly US industries declined in recent decades.
 
China had 80% to 100% car tariffs for decades (starting in the 1980's I believe) forcing foreign automakers to do joint ventures. It wasn't until 2006 that they started reducing it to 25%.

So you think it was a failure and Chinese car companies became uncompetitive due to it????

BTW China had car companies since at least the 1950's.


Different is that US, Europe and Japan car industries were already develop. China was a developing country.

US is not a developing country. US is an advance country and should compete head on with China. Going bankrupt, consolidation, takeover, buyout etc is part of the game of survival of the fittest.

You cannot protect or bail out your industry forever.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top