Thinking
Registered Member
It’s shameful that Indians claiming others history. Partition and movement of people were from border area for vast majority of the people. Only indians who can claim some form of ownership with our ancestors were those that left the lands of Pakistan during partition.
Don’t think a mere few millions morphed into 1.5 bn Indians in 80 years. The rest of you are revisionists with no sheer connection to our lands and history.
To make things easier, I asked ChatGPT to provide a neutral source, and below was the response on King Porus.
Yes. If we rely on Greek primary sources and Western academic scholarship (rather than Pakistani or Indian nationalist narratives), the picture is actually fairly consistent.
1. Where was King Porus’ kingdom?
The overwhelming scholarly consensus is that Porus ruled the territory between the Jhelum (Hydaspes) and Chenab (Acesines) Rivers during Alexander’s invasion in 326 BCE.
If you place those rivers on a modern map:
Therefore:
- Jhelum River – almost entirely in Pakistan after entering Punjab.
- Chenab River – flows through Pakistan’s Punjab.
The core of Porus’ kingdom lay in what is today Punjab, Pakistan.
After the Battle of the Hydaspes, Alexander rewarded Porus with additional territory extending farther east, but his original homeland was centered between the Jhelum and Chenab.
Why is there disagreement today?
Because Pakistan and India did not exist in 326 BCE.
Some Indian writers describe him as an “ancient Indian king” because the Greeks used “India” (Indike) broadly for lands east of the Indus. Modern historians distinguish between the ancient geographic term “India” and the modern Republic of India.
Using today’s political borders:
- Core kingdom: Pakistan
- Later expanded territory: likely crossed into parts of modern Indian Punjab after Alexander’s victory.
2. What people did Porus belong to?
Oxford identifies him as ruler of the Pauravas, an ancient Indo-Aryan people.
Many historians believe the Pauravas were connected with the older Puru tribe known from Vedic literature, although this cannot be proven conclusively.
3. Who are his descendants?
This is where modern politics often enters the discussion.
The honest academic answer:
Nobody knows.
There is no documented genealogy from Porus to any living dynasty.
Claims that:
are direct descendants of Porus are not accepted as historical fact by mainstream scholarship.
- Katochs
- Rajputs
- Jats
- Khatris
- Gujjars
- Awans
- or anyone else
Western historians simply state that Porus was assassinated around 321–315 BCE, after which his kingdom disappeared into the expanding Mauryan Empire.
His family may well have survived, but there is no continuous historical record linking them to any present-day community.
4. What religion did Porus follow?
This is actually one of the most interesting questions.
The Greek sources never call Porus a “Hindu.”
Why?
Because Hinduism, as it exists today, did not yet exist in its modern form.
Instead, Porus almost certainly practiced what historians call:
This religion was based upon:
- Historical Vedic religion
- or Late Vedic religion
rather than temple worship.
- sacrifices (yajña)
- fire rituals
- Vedic priests
- reverence for deities such as:
- Indra
- Agni
- Varuna
- Soma
- Surya
5. How was Porus’ religion different from modern Hinduism?
Quite significantly.
Modern scholars therefore distinguish between Historical Vedic religion and the much broader religious tradition that gradually developed into what is now called Hinduism.
Porus’ religion (4th century BCE) Modern HinduismCentered on Vedic sacrifice
Centered largely on temple worship
Fire rituals dominant
Puja and bhakti dominant
Indra was one of the chief gods
Vishnu, Shiva, Devi dominate
Animal sacrifice existed in some rituals
Rare in most Hindu traditions today
Few or no idols in mainstream worship
Idol (murti) worship widespread
No organized bhakti movements
Bhakti is central
Upanishadic philosophy developing
Vedanta, Yoga, Tantra, Bhakti all integrated
6. Would Porus have called himself a “Hindu”?
Probably not.
The word “Hindu” originally came from the Old Persian pronunciation of Sindhu (the Indus River) and was first a geographical term, referring to people living beyond the Indus.
The development of “Hinduism” as an umbrella label for many indigenous South Asian religious traditions occurred much later, especially during the medieval and colonial periods.
Porus himself would have more likely identified with:
rather than using the later label “Hindu.”
- his kingdom (Paurava)
- his tribe (Puru/Paurava)
- and his Vedic religious traditions,
In summary
- Modern country: Porus’ core kingdom was located in present-day Punjab, Pakistan, between the Jhelum and Chenab Rivers.
- Ethnic affiliation: He ruled the Pauravas, likely connected to the ancient Puru tribe.
- Descendants: No modern group can be historically verified as his descendants; claims made by various communities are speculative rather than established history.
- Religion: He most likely practiced Late Vedic religion, which predates and differs in important ways from the diverse traditions now grouped under modern Hinduism.
LOL...HAA..
This internet slop from descendant of guy named "Porus"!
Does any one in Pakistan understands that "Porus" is a Greek name, right? I guess chatgpt can't give his real name? What a shame for his "descendants".




