Why should Pakistan accept a British criminal?

[K2RULEZ]

Hate to break it to you, that fat little fauji bhanja Naqvi is already negotiating a quid-pro-quo with his angrez mai baap...

Should Naqvi or X, Y, and Z individuals take that course of action, Pakistan stands to lose the most, both diplomatically and reputationally. It is no secret that the British Embassy in Pakistan is currently working overtime.

 

[K2RULEZ]

Pakistan's embarrassing performance displayed in one table:



This is where Pakistani leaders with tiny brain cells lose the battle in the economic and diplomatic front.

Look how limited Pakistan's trade and specifically export is with the rest of the world.

 

[K2RULEZ]

Pakistan resisting UK attempts to deport grooming gang leader

Pakistan is resisting attempts by the UK government to deport a freed ringleader of a Rochdale grooming gang.

Tahir Andrabi, a spokesman for Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told the BBC that Shabir Ahmed must be dealt with in accordance with UK laws and the government of Pakistan has "no connection whatsoever with this matter".

Calls have mounted for Ahmed's deportation but legislation from 1971 bars it. Ahmed's removal depends on Pakistan accepting him despite the UK government proposing to change the law.

Ahmed had dual British-Pakistani citizenship before being stripped of his UK passport following his 2012 conviction for multiple counts of rape and sexual offences against girls.

Ahmed, who came to the UK in the late 1960s, was one of nine men from Rochdale and Oldham found guilty of exploiting girls as young as 13 at two takeaway restaurants.

Andrabi said Ahmed's "heinous crimes demand serious introspection rather than the quest to search for extraneous causes".

He said: "The matter in question is entirely an internal matter of the United Kingdom.

"The individual concerned is a British national who spent his entire adult life in the UK and was duly convicted by a British court for reprehensible offences committed on British soil.

"Any decision regarding his release, supervision of usual legal status, falls exclusively within the jurisdiction of the competent British authorities and must be dealt with in accordance with the laws of the United Kingdom.

"Regardless of where he was born, the onus lies on where he grew up, was raised, groomed, and unfortunately spoiled."

He added: "The government of Pakistan has no connection whatsoever with this matter.

"We cannot be associated with any decisions relating to the individual's release or subsequent treatment under the British law."

Ahmed was jailed for 22 years and released on licence this month.

Victims of the gang were told provisions under the Immigration Act 1971 barred the removal of any Commonwealth citizen who arrived in the UK before 1973 and had been in the country for five years.

Under the UK government's proposed amendment, foreign criminals would no longer benefit from these protections where they are guilty of some serious crimes.

It would bring the law on deportation in line with the law on the removal of citizenship.


Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood this week said the 1971 Act provided protections for long-term UK residents but "should not be used as a bar against removal in cases like that of Shabir Ahmed".

The Home Office has acknowledged that Ahmed's removal depends on Pakistan accepting him.

Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the government should consider using "very robust measures to essentially compel" Pakistan to accept the return of Ahmed.

Speaking to Radio 4's World At One programme, Philp said ministers had a couple of options: to suspend bilateral overseas aid payments completely, and "the most extreme level", to apply visa sanctions to prevent Pakistani nationals entering the UK.

Philp said: "If a British citizen commits a crime somewhere else, we would accept them back and I would expect other countries to do the same when the boot's on the other foot."

After leaving prison, Ahmed was sent to 24-hour staffed accommodation and fitted with a GPS electronically monitored tag.

While he is in the UK, the government has said he would be returned to prison if he breaches a series of strict licence conditions.

Some of his victims said they were "frightened" and felt "unsafe" at his release.

Andy Burnham, who is set replace Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister next, has described Ahmed as a "vile criminal" who he wants deported.

Pakistan resists UK attempts to deport grooming gang leader Shabir Ahmed

The government of Pakistan says it has "no connection whatsoever" with the case of Shabir Ahmed.

www.bbc.com

 

[user]

Shabir Ahmed: Rochdale grooming gang leader 'could be deported'

A Home Office minister says they were examining changing the law to deport recently freed Shabir Ahmed.

www.bbc.co.uk

Why is Pakistan being forced and threatened of sanctions by growing voices from British politicians, far right activists and news outlets on taking a convicted serial r*pist and pedophile, Shabir Ahmed who has recently been released from prison. Ahmed came to the UK in 1970s and has spent most of his life in the UK. His crimes were committed in the UK and should face full force of the law. It is not Pakistans responsibility.

It's an utter shame to read about these criminals. It always brings a bad name to Pakistan and Muslims generally. Perhaps the UK wants to hand him over to CCD.

 

[K2RULEZ]

It's an utter shame to read about these criminals. It always brings a bad name to Pakistan and Muslims generally. Perhaps the UK wants to hand him over to CCD.

This has nothing to do with Pakistan and Muslims. These are nasty sex offenders that need to be dealt with according to British law. It is the British law that has allowed this sex offender to roam freely after serving his sentence. In many other countries this sex offender would be handed the death penalty.

Deporting this sex offender who lived most of his adult life in Britain is teally a feel good exercise by Britain.