Yemen Civil War News and Discussion.. an evolving situation

I know the desire you have of posting nonsense like this but insinuating Houthis might have the guts to threaten PakistN like this is childish and immature. It’s the last thimg they would do before getting sent back to the stone-age. Stop posting nonsense or i will remove you from the discussion
😆 I didn’t even know what the post was about when I did reply to it yes Houthis striking Pakistan is stupid talk even if the Houthis did decide to launch one random missile on to Pakistani territory I’m fairly sure Pakistan would send 100 thousand men the following week to Saudi Arabia for that
 
Where is this great gain of territories?? Did they conquer Alaska or Texes? Where maybe Asir or Jizan or maybe different realm outside of this universe.. Stop the delulu
But dont get me wrong could change tomorrow next week or in a year from now unless I see Houthis running instead of advancing on multiple fronts this war is still in the Houthi favor for the time being small gains from the southern front have been far and few in between again reports from legitimate news agencies
 
But dont get me wrong could change tomorrow next week or in a year from now unless I see Houthis running instead of advancing on multiple fronts this war is still in the Houthi favor for the time being small gains from the southern front have been far and few in between again reports from legitimate news agencies

Taiz is a meatgrinder like bakhmut or Ghouta nothing to gain there but they are cleaned from bab al mandab and perim islands.. they will only waste their load on taiz nothing more
 

The EU should have condemned the terrorist Iranian IRGC, the terrorist mother organization in the region. I don't know why Europeans are unable or unwilling to see the whole picture.
 


...(continue)... The unusually direct statement sends a powerful message: Ansarallah is increasingly aware of the danger posed by Iran’s reformist camp and the administration’s growing willingness to sacrifice Yemen’s position in pursuit of regional deals.

Yemen has made its position clear: its resistance is not a bargaining chip for Tehran’s diplomacy.

Why then Houthi foreign minister was begging Pakistan for a mediation with Saudis in an interview with a Pakistani vlogger?

It's all lies. It's am attempt to give impression that Houthis are in a strong position even though their ass is being kicked left and right in Yemen. Irani fools think attacking civil airports in KSA puts Houthis in a stronger position. Shameless terrorists.

Iranians have such a mentality. After losing the whole leadership and getting tens of thousands of bombs from the air, they still claim to be victors in war with the US. One brainless Irani idiot even claimed that Iran has emerged as the third or fourth strongest power globally. Now you imagine how stupid these dudes are.

These are delusional idiots.
 
But dont get me wrong could change tomorrow next week or in a year from now unless I see Houthis running instead of advancing on multiple fronts this war is still in the Houthi favor for the time being small gains from the southern front have been far and few in between again reports from legitimate news agencies
Where are Houthis advancing exactly in Yemen?
 
Who’s puppets are enjoying this?

View attachment 219201
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.

I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.

For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.

This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
 
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.

I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.

For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.

This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
I'm inclined to agree with you.

There are quite a few here who won't. And will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove you wrong.
 
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.

I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.

For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.

This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.
 
I'm inclined to agree with you.

There are quite a few here who won't. And will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove you wrong.
I believe the primary points of divergence lie in the following:

1. The characterization of certain groups. There are Muslim groups that the outside world generally classifies as Muslim, yet other Muslim groups do not recognize them as such.

2. Lethal conflicts between Muslim groups—specifically those manipulated by external forces—and other Muslim groups. Some do not view this as an internal conflict within the Muslim world, regarding it instead as an external conflict; however, I maintain that the actual, face-to-face confrontation remains Muslim against Muslim.
It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.
Yes.

In the context of Chinese history and culture, periods such as the era of warlordism and the conflict between the KMT and the CCP are all regarded as civil wars. Even the current Taiwan issue is viewed as an internal conflict; it has never been classified as an external one.
 
Iran defacto controls the entire ME now no?

You think the US will save the ME now? They've been expelled no?

3 soobay under insurrection, near bankruptcy at any given moment, aur chalay hoosi baaghion naal jangain larrnay?

We can't do anything in Yemen and you know it.
It's a control based on chaos and causing more relative disruption to everyday way of life

Turani dahlitt stockholm syndrome thinking has meant you have lost sight of what good looks like, or it's become warped. How many nations and people should suffer?

Houthis have suffered a lot, Yemen has too, you need to stop egging people on away from civilization to go into barbarism, gonna support Taliban next?
 
It's a control based on chaos and causing more relative disruption to everyday way of life

Turani dahlitt stockholm syndrome thinking has meant you have lost sight of what good looks like, or it's become warped. How many nations and people should suffer?

Houthis have suffered a lot, Yemen has too, you need to stop egging people on away from civilization to go into barbarism, gonna support Taliban next?
Oh bhai, not everybody thinks like you as a colonized sepoy type no?

Not everybody has a sepoy background from colonial India like your jhaggurr daaday no?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top