Yemen Civil War News and Discussion.. an evolving situation

Who’s puppets are enjoying this?

View attachment 219201
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.

I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.

For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.

This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
 
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.

I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.

For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.

This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
I'm inclined to agree with you.

There are quite a few here who won't. And will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove you wrong.
 
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.

I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.

For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.

This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.
 
I'm inclined to agree with you.

There are quite a few here who won't. And will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove you wrong.
I believe the primary points of divergence lie in the following:

1. The characterization of certain groups. There are Muslim groups that the outside world generally classifies as Muslim, yet other Muslim groups do not recognize them as such.

2. Lethal conflicts between Muslim groups—specifically those manipulated by external forces—and other Muslim groups. Some do not view this as an internal conflict within the Muslim world, regarding it instead as an external conflict; however, I maintain that the actual, face-to-face confrontation remains Muslim against Muslim.
It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.
Yes.

In the context of Chinese history and culture, periods such as the era of warlordism and the conflict between the KMT and the CCP are all regarded as civil wars. Even the current Taiwan issue is viewed as an internal conflict; it has never been classified as an external one.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top