Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.
I'm inclined to agree with you.Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.
I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.
For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.
This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.
I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.
For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.
This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
I believe the primary points of divergence lie in the following:I'm inclined to agree with you.
There are quite a few here who won't. And will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove you wrong.
Yes.It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.