Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.
I'm inclined to agree with you.Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.
I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.
For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.
This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.Setting aside sarcasm and entertainment, the Islamic world does indeed have a greater propensity for internal infighting and is more susceptible to external manipulation.
I once commissioned an AI to conduct a data analysis. To avoid the significant margins of error found in older records, I focused on data spanning from the end of World War II to the present. The findings revealed that the number of Muslim deaths resulting from direct, internal sectarian violence far exceeds the number of deaths caused by conflicts between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world.
For instance, regarding the war in Iraq, casualties inflicted by the U.S. on Iraqis were tallied separately from those resulting from internal factional conflicts; the same methodology was applied to the war in Afghanistan. Even though many of these factional clashes were orchestrated or instigated by external forces, they were still classified as direct, internal violence within the Islamic world.
This is a matter that warrants deep reflection.
I believe the primary points of divergence lie in the following:I'm inclined to agree with you.
There are quite a few here who won't. And will perform all sorts of mental gymnastics to prove you wrong.
Yes.It’s the same situation as pre communist China during the warlord era. You had yin shikai, the northern warlords, then sun yat sen, Chiang kaishek in the south, the ma clique etc. only after one side the communist led mao achieved full victory did China finally get stability and then of course prosperity. The Muslim world or countries are going through same process but gid willing will come out stronger.
It's a control based on chaos and causing more relative disruption to everyday way of lifeIran defacto controls the entire ME now no?
You think the US will save the ME now? They've been expelled no?
3 soobay under insurrection, near bankruptcy at any given moment, aur chalay hoosi baaghion naal jangain larrnay?
We can't do anything in Yemen and you know it.
Oh bhai, not everybody thinks like you as a colonized sepoy type no?It's a control based on chaos and causing more relative disruption to everyday way of life
Turani dahlitt stockholm syndrome thinking has meant you have lost sight of what good looks like, or it's become warped. How many nations and people should suffer?
Houthis have suffered a lot, Yemen has too, you need to stop egging people on away from civilization to go into barbarism, gonna support Taliban next?
But am I wrong sir?Oh bhai, not everybody thinks like you as a colonized sepoy type no?
Not everybody has a sepoy background from colonial India like your jhaggurr daaday no?
Here are a few neutral assessment points:
- the government side lacks a cohesive fighting force. There are several groups that tend to backstab/blame each other and there is a lack of trust and a lot of mutual suspicions (some for good reasons).
- there is a lack of focus on cutting the logistics of the opponent, for instance, cutting off access to the ports and coast.
- They are more interested in positional fighting and lack a strategy for decisive victory.
- tactical lack coordinated (probably due to point 1) both on land and from air. Plans are very sporadic and in many cases reactive.
All this doesn’t bode well for them, unless these points are addressed properly, which is easier said than done.
The Houthis can only fight at one pace. Which is throwing the sink in and everything and they do not know any other way. They will eventually punch themselves out every soon.
Majority of them are high on ketamine like drugs or morphine it tends to make things fairytale like but with gazillions of deaths and war of attrition the khat addicts will become disillusioned and everything will turn horror instead and that is when gate open