Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not we, but dollar-khors who run pakistan and their faujeets here. They fooled us with the BS performance in May 2025. No one wants to drop a nuke over the fkers next door on both borders, but look at the BS performance. launching 1 missile at each target and then claiming it was a massive counter-attack. Its bad that not only they are cowards, but they don't even have basic form of self-respect. I digress from this threadYaar LVR.......bura mut mana kar kisy k comments ka.......And between all of us here.......hum kya bura maanain ab? when da whole fuckkin house on fire now?
This is a very slick move by the Zios to use the iranis as the anvil to their own hammer.
The messed around with Iran when they knew Iran would demolish da entire region in vengeance, then got all the foolish Arabs beat up and now threw us in da middle to go save them, so we also get demolished/ get bankrupted via attrition warfare.
Now the condition for GCC's and even our own survival is k we all must accept Israel and sign the Abraham accords or else we all get thrown in front of Iran/ Houthis and the US won't save us (financially). Iranis have demolished all US bases in the region except AL-Azraq.......for now. Da fuqq we'd be crazy to go fight with Iran or houthis......this ain't our war brah!
Look at this nonsense from a distance bhai.......the jews set this all up no?
If we refuse to fight Iran, they'd cut off our maany and we collapse.
Buss.......
Conflation and projection... to say they're void of any agency would be a fallacy... to say they have common cause on many things is a correct view.The point being, your assumption that certain parties to this grand game are independent of 3rd party influence is a bold one to make. That is unless you believe the French ("do let me dance first on Saladin's grave" and more recently, "we can do great things on Iran together Mr Trump") are neutral in the Middle East.
A fair perspective in a superficial sense but let us entertain the possibility of my being correct if only for a moment. In that scenario, could the Shahs or the Ayatollahs be better "entrusted" with being reliably and consistently hostile towards Arabs? As I recall, the elder Shah (let us disregard the big nosed idiot who claims the throne today) was a staunch friend of Pakistan, no less, and he was pragmatic towards both neighbouring Arabs and Israel alike. He suppressed Arab nationalist groups within Iran but was not directly at war with neighbouring Arab states (although he did provoke Kurdish separatism in Iraq on occasion I believe).
Meanwhile, the Ayatollahs had axes to grind, rightly or wrongly, with several neighbours. And eschatological religious perspectives are always easier to take advantage of by hostile 3rd parties than rationalised political narratives.
Anyway, I shall leave it at that for mere food for thought. Am no particular fan of anyone in the region frankly speaking. If it wasn't for India being a thorn in our side, I would favour a Pakistani imperial project to control all of the rest of them with an iron fist.
Stop talking stupidity.
al wala wal bara doing concerts' are concerts
Did Saudi's ever call/declare Iranians kafir? Please offer evidence.Those are your madkhalis doing takfir on all... but gulping the kool-aid on vali al'amr's direction.
Nothing else...
Did Saudi's ever call/declare Iranians kafir? Please offer evidence.