prothought
Registered Member
Irani mullahs are now courting Afghan Taliban to become Iran's proxy. Surprisingly Al-Qaida is the middle link.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is what happens in interacting with a complete numb nut!You should be ashamed of yourself for what you have offered as an evidence. There is tons of such 'evidence' exists on both sides declaring each other kafir in the past.
www.merip.org
I am asking you to provide evidence for any Saudi official/minister called Iranis Kafir or a Saudi state policy that declared Irani mullahs kafir?
ammanmessage.com
You ignorance is proving to be a curse for you. The whole world knows that al-i-Sheikh (that a crackhead idiot would call it Wahabism) holds only the Qadha (ministry of justice?) in Saudi Arabia while Al-i-Saud runs the country (administration, ministries, foreign policy, etc.) Even most of the imams in Haramain-Sharifain are not from al-i-Sheikh. You are offering an article published on some personal website as an evidence that Saudi government considers Iranian Shias as kafir. You need to see a highly qualified mental doctor, dude.This is what happens in interacting with a complete numb nut!
Unlike the rule in Iran Vilayat e Faqih... the rule in Saudi is split between religious and secular. For example Salman bin Abadal Aziz is Vali Al'amr but not authority on religion. For that, they used Wahabism, however officially distancing themselves into mainstream Hanbali school. However the Ikhwan and Sahwa were the main vectors. Running ideology... which has been shifting secular officially.
![]()
Saudi Arabia's Not So New Anti-Shi`ism - MERIP
Enmity for the Shi‘a in Saudi Arabia, never entirely absent, has become increasingly strident in 2006 and early 2007. The empowerment of the Iraqi Shi‘a and the bloody escalation of Sunni-Shi‘i violence in Iraq have intensified sectarian animosity around the Middle East, but in Saudi Arabia the...www.merip.org
The one that I quoted you are theological underpinnings of state enterprise by providing religious cover. Madkhalism has been used to push through a branch of salafism primarily pushed in western countries. For compliance...
The takfir he did would be mainstream in that theology.
Now for Iran the Supreme leader himself runs both religious and political affairs...
And they have no such tradition of doing takfir on Ahl-Sunnah.
Capisce‽
read above...
For officially nominated position holders doing rudimentary takfir... you can do your own research.
But since they're party to Amman Message...![]()
“They Are Not Our Brothers”
This report documents that Saudi Arabia has permitted government-appointed religious scholars and clerics to refer to religious minorities in derogatory terms or demonize them in official documents and religious rulings that influence government decision-making. In recent years, government...www.hrw.org
They officially will not declare them as non Muslims...
Though Sheikh Ibn Baz did it before as a Saudi official.Signing Up for Moderation: Endorsing the Amman Message
Permalink Signing Up for Moderation: Endorsing the Amman Message By Yahya Birt Posted on Tue Mar 27, 2007 at 08:57:00 AM EST Back in 2004, […]ammanmessage.com
Irani mullahs are now courting Afghan Taliban to become Iran's proxy. Surprisingly Al-Qaida is the middle link.
I shared Middle East Research and Information project, Human Rights watch and the page of Amman Message which has 84 countries as signatories. Affirming to not do takfir on certain minority groups including Shi'i.You are offering an article published on some personal website
That’s a fallacy, the differences & later on the feud among sahaba did not require any intervention or instigation by the Persians.
The reason Yazeed did not attack Imam Hussain as in Makkah is because Imam Hussain chose not make the Kaaba a shield for Himself & moved out of Makkah deliberately to preserve the sanctity of Makkah.
Imam Hussain had multiple wives & among them was lady Shaharbano was one among them.
Find another thread to disprove the tragedy of Karbala and satiate ur salafist tendencies.
I'm sure you've noticed by now that some Persians in this thread—including individuals whose ties to Iran are questionable—seem far more interested in pushing a pro-Iranian narrative than engaging honestly with evidence. The moment their claims are challenged, they shift the goalposts, contradict themselves, and manufacture convenient “facts” to prop up an argument that cannot withstand scrutiny. Baseless talking points are repeated ad nauseam, as though sheer repetition could somehow turn fiction into fact.
Meanwhile, the situation on the ground is deteriorating rapidly for their side. Their favorite political figure is edging closer to irrelevance, while back home, mass protests are dismissed as if they were nothing more than an inconvenient footnote. The hypocrisy is staggering, the denial is transparent, and the desperation to spin an increasingly unfavorable reality is becoming impossible to conceal.
If their arguments were as solid as they pretend, they wouldn't need to dodge questions, rewrite their own positions, and substitute propaganda for evidence.