Yet another Chinese rocket booster landing on a village

[Vikramaditya1]

List of space debris fall incidents​

List of space debris fall incidents - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You are just so eager to defend your western master, read with more care next time

Rocket booster falling with toxic fumes. That's the question, not some random metal piece shoulder gracing someone.

 

[Sharma Ji]

Not surprising.
Even some of them are ashamed of showing their real flags.

might you know where OP is from ? he says he's of Anglo German ancestry but I doubt.. my guess is he a lungi

I even had a thread at the old forum asking people..

 

[Sharma Ji]

https://defence.pk/threads/hamartia-antidotes-ethnicity.767794/

yaadein taaza kallo

 

[Sharma Ji]

"I’m Irish/English/French Canadian"

 

[Developereo]

"I’m Irish/English/French Canadian"

 

[Sharma Ji]

View attachment 51800

bhai is full khoofia kisam ka ajooba

 

[dbc]

You are just helpless in defending your western master. All rockets work the similar way, it doesn't matter where they are from.

No it doesn't. SpaceX does not use toxic fuel.

 

[Musings]

Guys please stick to the topic.
@Sharma Ji yaar don’t get bummed before the cricket match.

 

[Beijingwalker]

No it doesn't. SpaceX does not use toxic fuel.

Yes, it does.

SpaceX Rocket Fumes "Hazardous to Humans" and the Climate, Scientists Warn

It looks like the exhaust fumes from SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets (and others like it) are actually super toxic to humans — and to the planet we call home.

futurism.com

 

[JaneBhiDoYaaron]

View attachment 51800

Including the quote

 

[dbc]

Yes, it does.

SpaceX Rocket Fumes "Hazardous to Humans" and the Climate, Scientists Warn

It looks like the exhaust fumes from SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets (and others like it) are actually super toxic to humans — and to the planet we call home.

futurism.com

Everything thing is hazardous but you don't even know the difference between TOXIC and Hazardous. The author of the paper you posted is concerned about the adverse impact to the ozone layer.

SpaceX Falcon 9 uses Kerosene, kerosene is significantly less toxic than hypergolic propellant. Just 4.2 grams of hyperbolic propellant can kill an average adult.




From your source:

The rockets propulsion creates significant heating in the atmosphere, which is poorly (if notat all) understood. We speculate that the limited research on
this topic is because rocket launches presently have a negligi-
ble effect on total stratospheric ozone4. However, we should
expect that rocket emissions will increase more significantly
than currently due to the developments in the space indus-
try. Therefore, the impact on the atmosphere will be a crucial
factor requiring careful consideration in the design of future

 

[Beijingwalker]

Everything thing is hazardous but you don't even know the difference between TOXIC and Hazardous.

Every thing we use today is toxic at various degrees, but not everyone of them hazardous to human lives.

 

[dbc]

Every thing we use today is toxic at various degrees, but not everyone of them hazardous to human lives.

Read this.
Everything thing is hazardous but you don't even know the difference between TOXIC and Hazardous. The author of the paper you posted is concerned about the adverse impact to the ozone layer.

SpaceX Falcon 9 uses Kerosene, kerosene is significantly less toxic than hypergolic propellant. Just 4.2 grams of hypergolic propellant can kill an average adult.




From your source:

The rockets propulsion creates significant heating in the atmosphere, which is poorly (if notat all) understood. We speculate that the limited research on
this topic is because rocket launches presently have a negligi-
ble effect on total stratospheric ozone4. However, we should
expect that rocket emissions will increase more significantly
than currently due to the developments in the space indus-
try. Therefore, the impact on the atmosphere will be a crucial
factor requiring careful consideration in the design of future

 

[Beijingwalker]

Read this.
Everything thing is hazardous but you don't even know the difference between TOXIC and Hazardous. The author of the paper you posted is concerned about the adverse impact to the ozone layer.

SpaceX Falcon 9 uses Kerosene, kerosene is significantly less toxic than hypergolic propellant. Just 4.2 grams of hypergolic propellant can kill an average adult.




From your source:

The rockets propulsion creates significant heating in the atmosphere, which is poorly (if notat all) understood. We speculate that the limited research on
this topic is because rocket launches presently have a negligi-
ble effect on total stratospheric ozone4. However, we should
expect that rocket emissions will increase more significantly
than currently due to the developments in the space indus-
try. Therefore, the impact on the atmosphere will be a crucial
factor requiring careful consideration in the design of future

US has been polluting the space for multiple decades while China is the leader in clean energy and fuel.

 

[dbc]

US has been polluting the space for multiple decades while China is the leader in clean energy and fuel.
View attachment 51996

Well if ‘the leader’ drops tons of extremely toxic chemicals on an unsuspecting village then I guess we need to redefine leader.