SMASH SLBM Testing - Nov 2025

Ibbi32 said:
Was referring to the number of baraks in IN. Yes the number of brahmos in IN is frankly terrifying the number of proper AD is kinda laughable in comparison. 32 baraks for however potent they may be can be easily saturated by drones and CMs leaving even fewer so chances of them then being able to take on a decent number of SMASH go down with them. The us struggled to fight houthis with many more and much more potent missiles. With some proper planning you can very easily force the IN to turn back long before they get into a brahmos firing solution by simply depleting their AD capabilities such that they have to return home. PN has many of the same shortcomings in this regard but we will have better air and shore based AD cover.
Click to expand...
we suffer from this issue but orders of magnitude worse.

054a's arent equipped for modern swarm attacks

babur carry 12 missiles, so
 
Corax said:
Are you sure about that? The missile in that video is flying a nap of the earth flight profile at high speed, similar to what a land launched brahmos would do. The CM400AKG doesn't fly like that, it would follow a ballistic trajectory.
Click to expand...
Don't know about vector shown in video but that's not a Brahmos for sure
 
muhammed45 said:
Bother yourself and google it. I wonder why you react like a kid.

en.wikipedia.org

CM-400 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Naming a marketed military hardware has a meaning.

CM = cruise missile
BM = ballistic missile
Click to expand...


Pardon my friend, but the only one who is acting like a stupid child and even does not notice it, is you!

1. Wiki is not a source and even more so not on Chinese military stuff ... but if you are already on to it and accept it as a development of the SY-400, which is a ballistic missile, how could then the air-launched variant be a cruise missile?

1764160727621.png
1764160683825.png

2. CM IMO does not stand for cruise missile but anyway for whatever in fact it doesn't matter! If you don't believe me, then ask others or listen to what others here already posted!

So, don't be stubborn and better check the facts.
 
Corax said:
How do you know it's not?
Click to expand...
Bcz this video is from indian side, and shared by Pakistan's sources, so it could be CM-400 AKG. The trajectory u see is could be re-entry phase. Also ALBM does not go as the same altitude as GLBM's.
 
Deino said:
Pardon my friend, but the only one who is acting like a stupid child and even does not notice it, is you!

1. Wiki is not a source and even more so not on Chinese military stuff ... but if you are already on to it and accept it as a development of the SY-400, which is a ballistic missile, how could then the air-launched variant be a cruise missile?

View attachment 161956
View attachment 161955

2. CM IMO does not stand for cruise missile but anyway for whatever in fact it doesn't matter! If you don't believe me, then ask others or listen to what others here already posted!

So, don't be stubborn and better check the facts.
Click to expand...
I brought you a solid evidence and you read it. Glad to save you from ignorance. Have a nice day
 
bravo_1 said:
Bcz this video is from indian side, and shared by Pakistan's sources, so it could be CM-400 AKG. The trajectory u see is could be re-entry phase. Also ALBM does not go as the same altitude as GLBM's.
Click to expand...
No, the re-entry trajectory of a ballistic missiles would be similar to what you see for F2 or SMASH, not nap of the earth flight profile like you see in the video. If the video is from india then it's probably brahmos in it's cruise stage supersonic flight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hnn
bravo_1 said:
Bcz this video is from indian side, and shared by Pakistan's sources, so it could be CM-400 AKG. The trajectory u see is could be re-entry phase. Also ALBM does not go as the same altitude as GLBM's.
Click to expand...
Or it could be a Indian SAM? CM400 wouldn't be powered during its terminal phase nor would it be flying that trajectory. This discussion isn't relevant to the thread anyways.
 
Corax said:
If you take Google and wiki as the gospel truth, then that's you're prerogative, but I'd suggest you look a little more into it.
Click to expand...
Of course i won't trust the whole world and instead i will take a nobody forum-er's words for it such as you.

Chinese military industrial complex and their marketers are amateurs and liars for naming a marketed cruise missile as CM-400AKG. They should've named it BM-400AKG. Lol, dude get a life and try to learn. Stop embarrassing yourself and wasting my time.
 
Corax said:
No, the re-entry trajectory of a ballistic missiles would be similar to what you see for F2 or SMASH, not nap of the earth flight profile like you see in the video. If the video is from india then it's probably brahmos in it's cruise stage supersonic flight.
Click to expand...
images.png
 
muhammed45 said:
Of course i won't trust the whole world and instead i will take a nobody forum-er's words for it such as you.

Chinese military industrial complex and their marketers are amateurs and liars for naming a marketed cruise missile as CM-400AKG. They should've named it BM-400AKG. Lol, dude get a life and try to learn. Stop embarrassing yourself and wasting my time.
Click to expand...
And you're an expert on Chinese weapon naming convention are you? This coming from someone who believes the houtis shot down a US navy F18 using an anti ship ballistic missiles! Lol What a clown.
 
Maarkhoor said:
CM400AKG nota ballestic missile neither fallow ballestic trjectory.
Click to expand...
It's quasi ballistic, and it's definitely not a cruise missile that flies nap of the earth, which is what you see in the video.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top