JF-17 - Updates, News & Discussion

[Trailer23]

Way above my pay-grade dude...

It isn't just 'bout the pay-grade.

For guys in Pakistan -its also a matter of: Kali Vigo na ajaey

Just plead the fifth.

 

[hasssanali8998]

Nasr as a nuclear delivery platform was a bit of a joke to begin with less than 100km range, I think it was what 60 or 80km?

nasr is for tactical strikes (0.5 to 5 kt ) against an advancing Indian army , not meant for tactical strikes in cites , 70 to 100 km is a perfectly fine range

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

nasr is for tactical strikes against an advancing Indian army , not meant for tactical strikes in cites , 50 to 100 km is perfectly fine range

bhai, even in a 50 to 100 km radius the radiation is going to give us a splitting headache too, I guess..

 

[hasssanali8998]

bhai, even in a 50 to 100 km radius the radiation is going to give us a splitting headache too, I guess..

nasr is meant as a last strategy bhai

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

Nasr as a nuclear delivery platform was a bit of a joke to begin with less than 100km range, I think it was what 60 or 80km?

A Pakistani response was necessary after India announced its "Cold Start" doctrine in 2004.

Test flight of NASR in 2011 has indefinitely put Cold Start into Cold Storage since then.

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

nasr is meant as a last strategy bhai

last strategy should be atleast more than 300-400 kms atleast. we need to now convert them into conventional weapons and need to assign them to rocket force

 

[Corax]

nasr is for tactical strikes (0.5 to 5 kt ) against an advancing Indian army , not meant for tactical strikes in cites , 70 to 100 km is a perfectly fine range

That strategy wasn't feasible to begin with, it's like cutting off your own nose to smite your enemy. Using tactical nukes in response to the cold start doctrine only leads to full nuclear exchange. In any case, Nasr being a GMLRs has been superceded my F2 and Abdali version with longer range, I doubt whether Nasr is even in use now.

 

[AeronautIR]

It isn't just 'bout the pay-grade.

For guys in Pakistan -its also a matter of: Kali Vigo na ajaey

Just plead the fifth.

I can state various reasons for why this hype of Vigo is exaggerated but I was serious in claiming that I actually don't know about the rationale behind these strategic decisions...
And I am sure they don't care about our guesswork regarding the strategic restraint.

 

[Trailer23]

nasr is for tactical strikes (0.5 to 5 kt ) against an advancing Indian army , not meant for tactical strikes in cites , 70 to 100 km is a perfectly fine range

Wo CM-400AKG did well against the S-400.

​

Rassi say Nukes uss pay band dou & Launch.

Hamarey loog kuch bhee kar saktay hain.

Sindhi expert/scientist taking a detailed look at BrahMos

​

 

[hasssanali8998]

That strategy wasn't feasible to begin with, it's like cutting off your own nose to smite your enemy.

that is the point man . doing everything to stop Indians from capturing territory

Using tactical nukes in response to the cold start doctrine only leads to full nuclear exchange.

i don't think so , we aren't striking their cities . just their troops

I doubt whether Nasr is even in use now.

it is , Pakistan wants all the options available

again , everything in our arsenal has a use case

 

[hasssanali8998]

Wo CM-400AKG did well against the S-400.

Rassi say Nukes uss pay band dou & Launch.

Hamarey loog kuch bhee kar saktay hain.

Sindhi expert/scientist taking a detailed look at BrahMos

View attachment 164376​

i can hear the sindhi in this pic lmao

 

[Corax]

that is the point man .

i don't think so , we aren't striking their cities . just their troops

it is , Pakistan wants all the options available

again , everything in our arsenal has a use case

So you wouldn't expect them to escalate if we use tactical nukes?! They would at least respond in kind, which then only leaves one option, so it's pointless of you're at a stage of resorting to nukes or any kind.

 

[hasssanali8998]

So you wouldn't expect them to escalate if we use tactical nukes?! They would at least respond in kind, which then only leaves one option, so it's pointless of you're at a stage of resorting to nukes or any kind.

fair , but nasr is necessary , even just it existing means India wont try cold start doctrine

 

[Samurai]

Wo CM-400AKG did well against the S-400.

View attachment 164380​

Rassi say Nukes uss pay band dou & Launch.

Hamarey loog kuch bhee kar saktay hain.

Sindhi expert/scientist taking a detailed look at BrahMos​

"Sindhi expert/scientist taking a detailed look at BrahMos"

Btw during the May conflict, did any BrahMos missile managed to be jammed or fell intact (or almost intact)?? If it did happened indeed, then Pakistan must be seriously looking into it.

 

[Reichmarshal]

"Sindhi expert/scientist taking a detailed look at BrahMos"

Btw during the May conflict, did any BrahMos missile managed to be jammed or fell intact (or almost intact)?? If it did happened indeed, then Pakistan must be seriously looking into it.

most were jammed