Trump Officials Announce More Than $11 Billion in Arms Sales for Taiwan

F-22Raptor

Elite Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
27,928
Reaction score
29,551
Reputation
1,468.4
Country of Origin
Country of Residence


The Trump administration asked Congress on Wednesday to approve an arms package for Taiwan valued at more than $11 billion, in what would be a huge injection of military aid to the self-governing democratic island bracing for a long-feared invasion by China.

If approved by Congress, as is likely given Taiwan’s strong bipartisan support, the package would exceed the $8.4 billion in arms sold to Taiwan during the Biden administration, according to figures recently compiled by the research arm of Britain’s House of Commons. And it would be equivalent to more than half the $18.3 billion in arms sold to Taiwan during President Trump’s first term in office.

The size of the proposal is likely to reassure China hawks in Washington who have grown uneasy about Mr. Trump’s commitment to defending Taiwan as he seeks to cut trade and economic deals with Beijing.
 


The Trump administration asked Congress on Wednesday to approve an arms package for Taiwan valued at more than $11 billion, in what would be a huge injection of military aid to the self-governing democratic island bracing for a long-feared invasion by China.

If approved by Congress, as is likely given Taiwan’s strong bipartisan support, the package would exceed the $8.4 billion in arms sold to Taiwan during the Biden administration, according to figures recently compiled by the research arm of Britain’s House of Commons. And it would be equivalent to more than half the $18.3 billion in arms sold to Taiwan during President Trump’s first term in office.

The size of the proposal is likely to reassure China hawks in Washington who have grown uneasy about Mr. Trump’s commitment to defending Taiwan as he seeks to cut trade and economic deals with Beijing.


Very over priced for the limited military capability it will offer relative to China's. At this point, Taiwan should simply not bother.
 
Very over priced for the limited military capability it will offer relative to China's. At this point, Taiwan should simply not bother.

Agreed, nothing really cutting edge or really long range. These weapons will make the life of Chinese marines harder when they invade, but no real game changers here.

Trump did a very god deal here for US
 
Very over priced for the limited military capability it will offer relative to China's. At this point, Taiwan should simply not bother.

82 HIMARs, 400+ ballistic missiles, 1,200+ GMLRS, 2,500 anti tank missiles certainly isn’t limited. Especially in a contested amphibious landing.

The weapons above have inflicted massive losses on the Russians, and the Russians have a far easier route of attack and supply lines than China would.
 
Very over priced for the limited military capability it will offer relative to China's. At this point, Taiwan should simply not bother.
Its all about making the invasion as costly as possible..
 
Its all about making the invasion as costly as possible..

The distance between China and Taiwan is between 82miles and 112 miles, and with the grown of Chinese satellites, drones and short range systems, none of this equipment will last very long.
 
82 HIMARs, 400+ ballistic missiles, 1,200+ GMLRS, 2,500 anti tank missiles certainly isn’t limited. Especially in a contested amphibious landing.

The weapons above have inflicted massive losses on the Russians, and the Russians have a far easier route of attack and supply lines than China would.

Oh please, Chinese already did a little test run with Pakistan in May on how they can spot mobile S-400 units and Brahmos units.

Yes, these things will complicate any invasion plans, but nothing the Chinese cannot easily overcome. Russia/Ukraine land mass is massive, Russian tech lags behind much of Ukraine's. The situation is the complete opposite of China v Taiwan
 
The distance between China and Taiwan is between 82miles and 112 miles, and with the grown of Chinese satellites, drones and short range systems, none of this equipment will last very long.

Oh please, Chinese already did a little test run with Pakistan in May on how they can spot mobile S-400 units and Brahmos units.

Yes, these things will complicate any invasion plans, but nothing the Chinese cannot easily overcome. Russia/Ukraine land mass is massive, Russian tech lags behind much of Ukraine's. The situation is the complete opposite of China v Taiwan

Taiwans terrain is very hilly/mountainous and HIMARs will be very difficult to target due to its mobility. You vastly underestimate how hard it will be for China to conduct an amphibious assault onto Taiwan, and maintain its supply lines.

With US involvement, CSIS estimates China will lose 90% of its amphibious transport and landing ships within the first two weeks of the war.

There is nothing “easy” about assaulting Taiwan.
 
Taiwans terrain is very hilly/mountainous and HIMARs will be very difficult to target due to its mobility. You vastly underestimate how hard it will be for China to conduct an amphibious assault onto Taiwan, and maintain its supply lines.

With US involvement, CSIS estimates China will lose 90% of its amphibious transport and landing ships within the first two weeks of the war.

There is nothing “easy” about assaulting Taiwan.

Where did I say invading Taiwan was easy? Why are you putting words in my mouth?

The full might of Chinese sattelites and missiles will be available to cover Tawain, an Island half the size of Pakistan's Punjab provience.

Good luck, even the US military knows China will win.
 
Where did I say invading Taiwan was easy? Why are you putting words in my mouth?

The full might of Chinese sattelites and missiles will be available to cover Tawain, an Island half the size of Pakistan's Punjab provience.

Good luck, even the US military knows China will win.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. With 90% losses in its amphibious transport, China loses every time. You can’t reinforce and resupply your forces with those catastrophic losses.

An CSIS estimates China loses against Taiwan/US in their war game analysis.
 
You don’t know what you’re talking about. With 90% losses in its amphibious transport, China loses every time. You can’t reinforce and resupply your forces with those catastrophic losses.

An CSIS estimates China loses against Taiwan/US in their war game analysis.

These "90% losses". Are they in the room with you right now?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top