Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[mangekyo]

No if this was a lead up to overthrow Iranian government to takeout leaders and people across the board what would Iran have to lose but I guess time will tell

Why eat 10 bombs when you can eat 9?

 

[kastor ville]

This might be fishy, he looks just like old rich dude, why would he mess around with such kind of politics.

Either way it's a mistake... This is what a fascist government would do. Take over private property. I don't agree with this move at all. The long-term implication is do not invest in Iran. They might take your money

 

[KingQamaR]

This might be fishy, he looks just like old rich dude, why would he mess around with such kind of politics.

Unless this sign of the Governments insecurity. Or far worrying , CIA and Mossad project how much its managed to penetrate Iranians society from all backgrounds and classes!

 

[lightning f57]

I had said that before trumpy took office. Too late to do now for Iranian leaders, unfortunately they are lacking strategic competence, not reading the room so to speak. Now at the 11th hr with trumpy holding all the cards he will only want surrender.

They should have tested the bomb.

 

[PakAl]

Last time they bombed all our nuclear facilities and we only hit a radar in return. I’m 100% sure they do not fear a retaliation. Something does not add up.

Trump does not want a war with Iran, or else last time he had the perfect chance to join on the Israeli attacks, he only bombed the nuclear facilities and finished off the war. Right now it is Israel who wants to attack Iran and wants Usa to help. China, Pakistan and others are opposing this attack, China has economic interests in Iran, the last time no Oil Gas pipeline was hit but if a full blown war happens then everything will be targeted and Iran will also do the same. The attack could lead to a big war with Iran, and harm the whole region. This doesnt mean Trump will not do it, it all depends on how much the zionist pressurise Trump.

 

[Kharral]

1. The man being groomed for leadership is NOT the old Shah and will have none of the cultural affiliations with us that the old Shah had.

2. Pahlavi is the worst possible outcome for Pakistan, aside from true collapse and fragmentation of Iran.

3. Either the current regime or a nationalist variant of it will be best for Pakistani interests.

4. Ultimately, we have little to zero actual influence over the outcome and the matter as a whole, and should be prepared, come what may.

Correct on first 3 points & wrong on the 4th.

 

[Cash gk]

Is that true? In recent protests in Iran, protesters burned Quran and 34 mosques

 

[PakAl]

The nuclear program is already gone and there is literally zero incentive for sanctions removal for any reason from a US prespective. Giving up missiles just means going the way of Libya or Syria. Not giving them up means going to way of Afghanistan. So pick which is better.

Spot on. They already know Iran doesnt have the nukes, and they destroyed the nuclear facilities, what's left is the ballistic missile facilities, this is what the zionist want, for Usa to destroy them then Israeli will have total freedom in the middleeast, they can bomb Iran weekly, like they do to Lebanon, Yemen, Syria etc. Others will have no means to defend themselves or harm Israel.

 

[tsunset]

Is that true? In recent protests in Iran, protesters burned Quran and 34 mosques

Your numbers are not true

They damaged 250 mosque and burned thousands of Quran

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Kharral]

nuke used any where, would be a green signal to Russia as well!

no, nukes will not be used

Not only to to Russia. Besides Iran can survive a nuke, Israel can’t.

 

[Kharral]

Iran of today is the product of a democractically electected leader who was over thrown by the United Kingdom (MI6) and the United States (CIA).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh ( take some of it with salt given it can be edited by anyone but you can get the broad strokes ).

They then installed the Shah (Mohammad Reza Pahlavi) who ran a bloody and brutal regime, that was over thrown in the revolution in 1979 which is the IRI of today.

Iran of today is a product of external interference and it has gone to an extreme in its reaction to that interference. This shows why external countries should not interfere in the internal political affairs of countries as they have un-intended consequences.

Imagine a 75-80 year old Iranian democratic setup in the middle east? What Iran would have been like, had they left it alone ? What the region would have been like ?

ALLAH is the best of Planners !

 

[Cash gk]

Your numbers are not true

They damaged 250 mosque and burned thousands of Quran

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

So they were attacked by foreign missionaries and non-Muslims. How bad is Muslim he or she will never burn the Quran or a mosque.

 

[Ali_Baba]

wonder they have such influence

They can say, "you cannot use your bases in our countries, and you cannot use our airspace to attack Iran".

Surprised (not) to see UAE not in that list..

 

[RescueRanger]

They can say, "you cannot use your bases in our countries, and you cannot use our airspace to attack Iran".

 

[Cash gk]

Your numbers are not true

They damaged 250 mosque and burned thousands of Quran

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Bloody hell That was massive operation. What is standing now?