Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

📍NEW — Israel's demands put forward in the talks between the US and Iran:

▪️Complete cancellation of Iran's nuclear program.
▪️Reduction of uranium enrichment to zero.
▪️Reduction of uranium enrichment capability to zero.
▪️Removal of enriched uranium from Iran.
▪️Limiting the range of Iranian missiles to 300 km.
▪️Elimination of the Shiite axis.
▪️Close, strong, and genuine monitoring of the implementation of these items.

- Israel Channel 14 -

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Insane demands. No self-respecting Iranian could accept these terms.

They asked to limit the missiles range to 30km, not 300
 
I don't understand how the US wants Iran to limit its missiles range to 30km, how is it technically feasible unless its total disarmament?

A missile like Khorramshahr or Sejjil has a length of 15m with 2000km range with a 1500kg warhead, they will put a 100ton warhead to reduce the range to 30km?
 
I don't understand how the US wants Iran to limit its missiles range to 30km, how is it technically feasible unless its total disarmament?

A missile like Khorramshahr or Sejjil has a length of 15m with 2000km range with a 1500kg warhead, they will put a 100ton warhead to reduce the range to 30km?
I thought you were joking it’s actually 300km(which I agree is laughable and basically telling Iran to surrender) even neighboring countries in all of the Middle East can reach targets with missiles 200 miles or more but what’s your source for 30 km.
 
Something I do not understand, whats so scary about Iranian missiles ? they are not nuclear tipped, IRGC does not have a Sat-Nav LEO constellation of its own yet, force does not operate long ranged ALBMs either. What is the Jew concern here is beyond me. They are making zero noise over rather large order of SU-35S but some Fattahs and Sejjils are problem this big that Trump the pedo has to be blackmailed into talking to Iran over them ?

Fighter aircrafts need large airfields to operate from. They are impossible to hide. That is why they are easy to eliminate even on ground in a surprise attack.

Ballistic missiles can be concealed in underground bases and are usually on mobile launchers, so can fire from anywhere. no need for large runways.

Secondly, BMs are Iran's own program that means Iran controls how much advance it can go. So obviously Israelis are most concerned about it.

Iran can hit Telaviv with its BMs and not with SU-35s. That's why Israel is only concerned about Iran's BMs. Not to mention that SU-35s still a non-stealth fighter jets, Israelis will still consider an edge because of their 5th gen F-35s for any air engagements. I think Israel would have made some noise or feel concerned had Iran ordered SU-57s and not the SU-35s.
 
I thought you were joking it’s actually 300km(which I agree is laughable and basically telling Iran to surrender) even neighboring countries in all of the Middle East can reach targets with missiles 200 miles or more but what’s your source for 30 km.
TasnimNews

Its logical because 300km would mean Iran still able to attack neighboring countries and some US bases

30km removes all the threat, you really think they will let us have a 300km radius with our missiles?
 
TasnimNews

Its logical because 300km would mean Iran still able to attack neighboring countries and some US bases

30km removes all the threat, you really think they will let us have a 300km radius with our missiles?
I’m going to say mistranslation every site is saying 300 km definitely agree is funny and since most of their artillery can hit targets up to 100 miles or more but 30 km is wrong Iranian news sites are notorious with their mistranslation worse than my grammatical errors
 
I’m going to say mistranslation every site is saying 300 km definitely agree is funny and since most of their artillery can hit targets up to 100 miles or more but 30 km is wrong Iranian news sites are notorious with their mistranslation worse than my grammatical errors
It may be mistranslation but 30km is more realistic than 300km with US maximalist demands

300km means Qatar Bahrain and Israeli interests in Baku are still threatened

30km means none are their interests are threatened

For the artillery they will just ask to dismantle them and propose to buy US artillery with restricted range to 30km
 
It may be mistranslation but 30km is more realistic than 300km with US maximalist demands

300km means Qatar Bahrain and Israeli interests in Baku are still threatened

30km means none are their interests are threatened

For the artillery they will just ask to dismantle them and propose to buy US artillery with restricted range to 30km
Yeah sticking with the mistranslation myself and Iran can produce many artillery pieces on par with most nations when Russia needs to ask for artillery no need to outsource things you can build at home.
300 km range is what people are reporting and that’s a joke to be fair they’re not going to allow to be limited to a thousand km which is basically most of their srbm maximum range that could reach Israel if need be
 
No need to talk about limiting missile ranges, it's non-negotiable in the first place. Let's talk about how Iran can sink USN ships and blow stuff up big time in case war breaks out instead.
 
No need to talk about limiting missile ranges, it's non-negotiable in the first place. Let's talk about how Iran can sink USN ships and blow stuff up big time in case war breaks out instead.
I don't say they will accept, Iran will probably never accept this even if Iran is nuked or entirely reduced to ashes

But US wants total disarmament and limit Iran's arsenal to short range MRLS and free fall bomb and in exchange of selling to Iran useless F-16s like they sold to Iraq with dumb bombs as their sole armament
 
man iranian missiles messed up the zionist occupied mass murders soo much they dont know what to do now. Funny thing is that they haven't even seen the top of the like khoromshar 4 (solid fuel) and the very cheap rezwan missile yet and Allah knows the newer unveiled missile .
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


500-4000 deaths including security forces, terrorists and innocent civilians is the most realistic estimate
 

Source: https://ajnews.co.uk/araghchi-spoke...srael-at-two-press-conferences-on-february-8/

Araghchi spoke more about US-Iran talks and Israel at two press conferences on February 8​


image-52.png



Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said today that the presence of the CENTCOM commander made no difference to the essence of any talks, having been told the commander was there to visit on of their own ships.

“There was a request from the American side for him to be present during what I mentioned – that customary, polite encounter that usually takes place – but we categorically opposed it,” Araghchi stated, noting that Iran didn’t accept the presence of a military official in their negotiating process.

Araghchi said that during the talks, a direct meeting didn’t take place, but there was an encounter out of diplomatic courtesy.

“When delegations enter, there was at least a handshake and an initial courtesy – this used to happen in the past as well,” Arachchi noted, continuing: “In all past rounds, negotiations were conducted indirectly, but regardless, either upon entry or exit, the two delegations would encounter each other.”

Araghchi said that it wasn’t strange at all coming across the other delegation during talks, stating that there was a common practice in observing diplomatic courtesies.

Commenting on the progress of the talks, Araghchi said: “I believe that if our conclusion is that this seriousness exists on the opposing side, these negotiations continue, but if there are signs that this serious exists, but the signs are faint.”

Araghghi noted that the continuation of certain sanctions and some activities in the military sphere created doubt as to the seriousness and readiness of the US side for genuine negotiations, but they were monitoring everything, and then would evaluate all the signs together to make a decision regarding the continuation of the negotiations.

IRAN FM ON PEACE TALKS:

Foreign Minister Araghchi spoke later to cameras, saying: “Why have we insisted on enrichment so much, and are not willing to give it up, even if war is imposed on us? Because no one has the right to tell us what we should and shouldn’t have.”

“This is based on the principle of negotiation of domination – we have the right to enrich,” Araghchi added.

“If there are questions, we answer; if there is no trust, we can create trust, but no one has the right to tell us that you shouldn’t have it because I want it so,” Araghchi said.

Araghchi continued: “Enrichment is important, but besides that, it is more important that the Islamic Republic of Iran proves that it does not take orders and does not accept domination from anyone.”

According to Araghchi, if there is any question, any ambiguity regarding the goals of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, then Iran will answer, to resolve through ambiguity, and the only way is through diplomacy.

“They tried other ways, but it didn’t work, they bombed our facilities but the results they wanted was not achieved – knowledge cannot be destroyed by bombing – technology cannot be destroyed,” Araghchi said, adding that there is no other option to negotiate, and this is what the American team were told a “couple of days ago.”

Araghchi said: “Negotiations will only come to fruition when the rights of the Iranian people are acknowledged and respected and we can exercise our rights,” adding that Iran’s rights are official and existed, so Iran wanted their rights to be respected: “Iran’s power lies in its ability to resist bullying, hegemony, and pressure from others.”

“They are afraid of our atomic bomb, but we are not looking for an atomic bomb, our atomic bomb is the power to say no to great powers, and their military deployment in the region does not scare us – we are people of diplomacy, but we are also people of war – we are not looking for war, but we are ready to fight if we are challenged,” Araghchi warned.

In closing, Araghchi continued: “We are diplomatic because we have logic on our side, because we choose words, we are logical – if they choose the path of diplomacy, we will do the same – if they speak to Iran with respect, we will respond with respect, but if they speak with force, we will respond with force.”
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top