tsunset
The Legend
TasnimNews
Its logical because 300km would mean Iran still able to attack neighboring countries and some US bases
30km removes all the threat, you really think they will let us have a 300km radius with our missiles?
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Its logical because 300km would mean Iran still able to attack neighboring countries and some US bases
30km removes all the threat, you really think they will let us have a 300km radius with our missiles?
Shags101
Trusted Member
I’m going to say mistranslation every site is saying 300 km definitely agree is funny and since most of their artillery can hit targets up to 100 miles or more but 30 km is wrong Iranian news sites are notorious with their mistranslation worse than my grammatical errors
tsunset
The Legend
It may be mistranslation but 30km is more realistic than 300km with US maximalist demands
300km means Qatar Bahrain and Israeli interests in Baku are still threatened
30km means none are their interests are threatened
For the artillery they will just ask to dismantle them and propose to buy US artillery with restricted range to 30km
Shags101
Trusted Member
Yeah sticking with the mistranslation myself and Iran can produce many artillery pieces on par with most nations when Russia needs to ask for artillery no need to outsource things you can build at home.
300 km range is what people are reporting and that’s a joke to be fair they’re not going to allow to be limited to a thousand km which is basically most of their srbm maximum range that could reach Israel if need be
StrategicBear
Registered Member
No need to talk about limiting missile ranges, it's non-negotiable in the first place. Let's talk about how Iran can sink USN ships and blow stuff up big time in case war breaks out instead.
tsunset
The Legend
I don't say they will accept, Iran will probably never accept this even if Iran is nuked or entirely reduced to ashes
But US wants total disarmament and limit Iran's arsenal to short range MRLS and free fall bomb and in exchange of selling to Iran useless F-16s like they sold to Iraq with dumb bombs as their sole armament
ToqeLowkey
Registered Member
man iranian missiles messed up the zionist occupied mass murders soo much they dont know what to do now. Funny thing is that they haven't even seen the top of the like khoromshar 4 (solid fuel) and the very cheap rezwan missile yet and Allah knows the newer unveiled missile .
tsunset
The Legend
Iran says unexploded bombs still present at nuclear facilities struck by US
Iran says unexploded bombs still present at nuclear facilities struck by US
www.anews.com.tr
If he is talking about GBU-57, any chance Iran can transfer them to China in exchange of something?
VCheng
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Iran says unexploded bombs still present at nuclear facilities struck by US
Iran says unexploded bombs still present at nuclear facilities struck by US
If he is talking about GBU-57, any chance Iran can transfer them to China in exchange of something?
If they can be safely extracted.
Hassan Al-Somal
Elite Member
Source: https://ajnews.co.uk/araghchi-spoke...srael-at-two-press-conferences-on-february-8/Araghchi spoke more about US-Iran talks and Israel at two press conferences on February 8
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said today that the presence of the CENTCOM commander made no difference to the essence of any talks, having been told the commander was there to visit on of their own ships.
“There was a request from the American side for him to be present during what I mentioned – that customary, polite encounter that usually takes place – but we categorically opposed it,” Araghchi stated, noting that Iran didn’t accept the presence of a military official in their negotiating process.
Araghchi said that during the talks, a direct meeting didn’t take place, but there was an encounter out of diplomatic courtesy.
“When delegations enter, there was at least a handshake and an initial courtesy – this used to happen in the past as well,” Arachchi noted, continuing: “In all past rounds, negotiations were conducted indirectly, but regardless, either upon entry or exit, the two delegations would encounter each other.”
Araghchi said that it wasn’t strange at all coming across the other delegation during talks, stating that there was a common practice in observing diplomatic courtesies.
Commenting on the progress of the talks, Araghchi said: “I believe that if our conclusion is that this seriousness exists on the opposing side, these negotiations continue, but if there are signs that this serious exists, but the signs are faint.”
Araghghi noted that the continuation of certain sanctions and some activities in the military sphere created doubt as to the seriousness and readiness of the US side for genuine negotiations, but they were monitoring everything, and then would evaluate all the signs together to make a decision regarding the continuation of the negotiations.
IRAN FM ON PEACE TALKS:
Foreign Minister Araghchi spoke later to cameras, saying: “Why have we insisted on enrichment so much, and are not willing to give it up, even if war is imposed on us? Because no one has the right to tell us what we should and shouldn’t have.”
“This is based on the principle of negotiation of domination – we have the right to enrich,” Araghchi added.
“If there are questions, we answer; if there is no trust, we can create trust, but no one has the right to tell us that you shouldn’t have it because I want it so,” Araghchi said.
Araghchi continued: “Enrichment is important, but besides that, it is more important that the Islamic Republic of Iran proves that it does not take orders and does not accept domination from anyone.”
According to Araghchi, if there is any question, any ambiguity regarding the goals of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, then Iran will answer, to resolve through ambiguity, and the only way is through diplomacy.
“They tried other ways, but it didn’t work, they bombed our facilities but the results they wanted was not achieved – knowledge cannot be destroyed by bombing – technology cannot be destroyed,” Araghchi said, adding that there is no other option to negotiate, and this is what the American team were told a “couple of days ago.”
Araghchi said: “Negotiations will only come to fruition when the rights of the Iranian people are acknowledged and respected and we can exercise our rights,” adding that Iran’s rights are official and existed, so Iran wanted their rights to be respected: “Iran’s power lies in its ability to resist bullying, hegemony, and pressure from others.”
“They are afraid of our atomic bomb, but we are not looking for an atomic bomb, our atomic bomb is the power to say no to great powers, and their military deployment in the region does not scare us – we are people of diplomacy, but we are also people of war – we are not looking for war, but we are ready to fight if we are challenged,” Araghchi warned.
In closing, Araghchi continued: “We are diplomatic because we have logic on our side, because we choose words, we are logical – if they choose the path of diplomacy, we will do the same – if they speak to Iran with respect, we will respond with respect, but if they speak with force, we will respond with force.”
Hassan Al-Somal
Elite Member
Iran's FM, Araghchi:
Future of negotiations is unclear.
We don’t trust them & absolutely consider the possibility of deception & bad faith, it could be a trick—we should not be deceived.
Everyone should continue doing their work as if we are not negotiating at all, whether the armed forces, the government, or any other sector. They shouldn’t tie their actions to the talks. We will do our job; and we either reach a result or we don’t.
The country must run independently of any agreement, whether talks succeed or fail.
Future of negotiations is unclear.
We don’t trust them & absolutely consider the possibility of deception & bad faith, it could be a trick—we should not be deceived.
Everyone should continue doing their work as if we are not negotiating at all, whether the armed forces, the government, or any other sector. They shouldn’t tie their actions to the talks. We will do our job; and we either reach a result or we don’t.
The country must run independently of any agreement, whether talks succeed or fail.
925boy
Elite Member
Uh o....US left unexploded bombs in the territory of the TOP reverse engineering country? Big mistake for US and a potential bounty of US weapons for Iran to study and copy.
Unexploded US bombs at Fordow may also imply Fordow isn't as damaged as US(and probably
too) wants us to think it is. Fordow in the first place was designed to withstand heavy bombing, so I still believe fordow was partially destroyed at best. Facility destruction is a separate but related issue from Nuclear materials or equipment destruction. US behavior and angst shows that it and israel did not destroy Iran's nuclear materials or infrastructure well enough.
Falcon29
Elite Member
Do you believe China is supplying daul use materials and components for Iranian ballistic missile program?
Also good to see Chinese here challenging views of Iranians. There is definitely something up with Iranian radars that struggled to detect incoming Israeli attack.
I do think China/Russia gain from having US dedicate lots of resources to the ME region to counter Iran. In the long term that benefits China. But even if Iranian government ever fell, the US would not withdraw from region. This is a lie the US likes to sell. It would adjust its posture in region to be more targeted against other states in region.
Users who are viewing this thread
Country Watch Latest
Latest Posts
-
Mohsin Naqvi signal admirative units or new provinces will be formed at all cost. (5 Viewers)- Latest: Watandar
-
Two pilots are killed when Greek air force fighter jet crashes at air show (18 Viewers)
- Latest: Watandar
-
-
-
