SolarWarden
Trusted Member
Orangeman is not going to attack before the Ford arrives and before his State of the Union speech.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
China is not wholly dependent on Iranian oil supplies , china has many other options... it's Iran who is dependent on her oil export to china ... China's biggest oil suppliers Saudi and Russians.Trump's childish personal ego sometimes not always equates the US.
The US wants to contain China's oil supply chain by taking on Iran, but not in a childish pissing contest that Trump is doing for his personal vendetta.
Your understanding of the control the Zionists have over the country you yourself reside in is comical!
China is not wholly dependent on Iranian oil supplies , china has many other options... it's Iran who is dependent on her oil export to china ... China's biggest oil suppliers Saudi and Russians.
Although I can understand the aversion to Western hegemony—at least on this platform, many countries share the same sentiment and everyone’s views are aligned—it is undeniable that, apart from China and Russia, no other country poses an actual threat to the U.S. homeland. Japan once attacked a military base in Hawaii, but the U.S. mainland can quickly rearm its forces.I disagree.
There is no precedent to a nation attacking another with Nuclear Weapons just because a warship is sunk due to a conventional attack.
Sinking a carrier is good for morale, because it is a highly symbolic event that marks the end of Western Naval Dominance in the Earth's oceans since 500 years, after the Portuguese ruled the waves in Asia after they captured Malacca and took over the Spice Trade Routes in the Indian Ocean and Malacca Straits since that era till now ( 1526- 2026 AD which is 500 years of Western Naval Supremacy in a region stretching from West Asia to SE Asia ).
I still have self-esteem problems when comparing our people to Europeans, where I'm not proud being a majority ethnic group in Malaysia because our military history sucks because our Malacca Sutanate lost to white-skinned foreign navy from Europe(Portugeuese) who came from Iberia that has just chased out brown Muslims, so I want to see US NAVY be destroyed as they are the modern-day Portugal for me who I want to see their navy be destroyed as I am still bitter Malacca couldn't won the war against the Portuguese White Crusader invader scum.
For many people of color who are mad at White People for their racism and Islamphobia, like ME here, it is very necessary to see a Highly Symbolic and Visible Asset of Modern-Day Western Naval Dominance like a USN Supercarrier be sunk in a Live, Real, War(not theory or wargames anymore) so as to elevate our Morale, our Self-Esteem, and even our Self-Confidence.
The sinking of a carrier allows many people to celebrate and live in high hopes that Western Naval Dominance and White People in Wars can be defeated by Non-White and Non-European, Non-Caucasian Peoples and gives us people of color a sense of pride and prestige that we can eliminate a highly symbolic asset of Caucasian Military Dominance in warfare(sure, Black Americans exist and USA is not just Whites, but it is Whites that are the Number 1 Majority race that still runs the country there, so the US military is still considered a representative of a "Caucasian Military Dominance as most of its soldiers are white")
Therefore, sinking A USN Supercarrier is a must, a "Baptism of Fire" (for a lack of a better word), to reduce Westerners into no longer a Military Powerhouse but to turn them into Insignificants in the face of the proud BRICS Alliance.
I think it is fairly certain at this point that in a potential war with the US, China will be the most passive country as usual.
This is not to blame them. It's just a prediction based on their past actions and their pattern of decision making which is non-confrontational and purely based on economic profit.
The amount of technology China has given Iran in recent few months surpasses anything seen in alliances around the world; the very system that disabled Starlink came from China, and much more :I think it is fairly certain at this point that in a potential war with the US, China will be the most passive country as usual.
This is not to blame them. It's just a prediction based on their past actions and their pattern of decision making which is non-confrontational and purely based on economic profit.
As I've already mentioned here, geopolitical analysts in Brazil have reported that Iran is expanding its "resistance" and this could include Afghanistan. Afghanistan had already offered to help days ago if requested, and today sent a message to Iran
saying that all they have to do is request Afghan guerrilla troops, which will be sent to be commanded by Iranian officers.
NOTE: Iran has not yet requested troops because (as I've already said here) there will be no open war, only the probability of a media stunt like in Venezuela, but in response to this supposed stunt, iran may request an alliance with Afghanistan.
Source for this?As I've already mentioned here, geopolitical analysts in Brazil have reported that Iran is expanding its "resistance" and this could include Afghanistan. Afghanistan had already offered to help days ago if requested, and today sent a message to Iran
saying that all they have to do is request Afghan guerrilla troops, which will be sent to be commanded by Iranian officers.
NOTE: Iran has not yet requested troops because (as I've already said here) there will be no open war, only the probability of a media stunt like in Venezuela, but in response to this supposed stunt, iran may request an alliance with Afghanistan.
The amount of technology China has given Iran in recent few months surpasses anything seen in alliances around the world; the very system that disabled Starlink came from China, and much more :
Read - Important Aid from China to Iran :
Alistair Crook, British diplomat and former MI6 officer: Before the 12-day war, Iran used Google's navigation system, but after the war, it completely migrated to China's Beidou navigation system. Tracking or interfering with this system is virtually impossible or extremely difficult.China has deployed its largest intelligence and espionage ship in the Gulf of Oman, and this ship transmits real-time information about the enemy to Iran.
This means that Iranian missiles no longer rely on GPS and cannot be neutralized by disabling the GPS signal.China has also provided Iran with radars capable of detecting enemy stealth aircraft at a distance of 600 kilometers.Furthermore, China has provided Iran with the same advanced navigation system that played a crucial role in Pakistan's superiority over India, this time on a broader and more comprehensive scale.
Because he claims that China is not interested in military involvement in the Middle East because nobody wants to give them military bases here.I don't know why you did the Laugh reaction to @wangdefa sensible post just above while you don't 'blame them'?
Also, who is that say an America-Israel attack on Iran would not give China enough reason to finally take care of its Taiwan Problem once and for all, with tacit American approval?? Or even for Russia to finally settle the Ukraine issue by taking as far land as Odessa, again with tacit American approval??
Great Powers have worked like that before.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.