Chinese PLAAF News

Chinese fighter jets locked radar on foreign stealth plane at 800 metres: PLA Daily​

Military commentators say PLA aircraft cited by official military paper was likely to have been a J-16​



The J-16 regularly patrols the Chinese east coast and potential flashpoints such as the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait. Photo: 81.com

Yuanyue Dangin Beijing
Published: 7:47pm, 13 Feb 2026Updated: 8:47pm, 13 Feb 2026

China’s official military paper has revealed another incident in which PLA fighter jets radar-locked a foreign stealth aircraft, four months after state media reported a similar encounter.

A social media account affiliated with the PLA Daily said in an article published on Wednesday that Eastern Theatre Command fighter jets locked their radar onto a foreign stealth aircraft at a distance of 800 metres (2,624 feet).

The article did not say when or where the encounter took place.

Military commentators speculated that the People’s Liberation Army jets involved were J-16 fighters. The foreign aircraft remains unidentified.

The PLA Daily interviewed a brigade of the Eastern Theatre Command Air Force, describing it as a heroic unit with “a rich history and distinguished combat achievements”.
 

Chinese fighter jets locked radar on foreign stealth plane at 800 metres: PLA Daily​

Military commentators say PLA aircraft cited by official military paper was likely to have been a J-16​



The J-16 regularly patrols the Chinese east coast and potential flashpoints such as the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait. Photo: 81.com

Yuanyue Dangin Beijing
Published: 7:47pm, 13 Feb 2026Updated: 8:47pm, 13 Feb 2026

China’s official military paper has revealed another incident in which PLA fighter jets radar-locked a foreign stealth aircraft, four months after state media reported a similar encounter.

A social media account affiliated with the PLA Daily said in an article published on Wednesday that Eastern Theatre Command fighter jets locked their radar onto a foreign stealth aircraft at a distance of 800 metres (2,624 feet).

The article did not say when or where the encounter took place.

Military commentators speculated that the People’s Liberation Army jets involved were J-16 fighters. The foreign aircraft remains unidentified.

The PLA Daily interviewed a brigade of the Eastern Theatre Command Air Force, describing it as a heroic unit with “a rich history and distinguished combat achievements”.
Just another delicious article.

First - even it's true means that 800 miters, means must stealth fighter might already have radar locked before PlAAf plane even reached near by 800 meters, while flying at international air space.
 
Just another delicious article.

First - even it's true means that 800 miters, means must stealth fighter might already have radar locked before PlAAf plane even reached near by 800 meters, while flying at international air space.
You need some update, this is just an old story from last year, it was a close distance aerial engament between F-22 and J-16 during patrol.
 
Below 1 km is normal. Must detect stealth planes at more than 100 kms then can fire BVR...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Repeated Violations

China’s Combat-Ready Air Force Surpasses U.S. by 18 Percent in Major Shift in Global Military Power​

China’s combat-ready air force is reportedly 18 percent larger than that of the United States, reflecting shifting military aviation dynamics

Ethan Collins
21 February 2026

Washington — China now fields a combat-ready air force that is approximately 18 percent larger than that of the United States, according to figures highlighted by the verified X account associated with Jackson Hinkle and later cited by hokanews.

The comparison, focused specifically on operational and combat-ready aircraft rather than total fleet size, underscores shifting dynamics in global military aviation capabilities.

While the United States has historically maintained qualitative advantages in stealth technology, pilot training and global reach, China’s numerical expansion reflects rapid modernization and sustained investment in defense infrastructure.

Understanding “Combat-Ready” Metrics​

Combat-ready aircraft refer to planes that are mission-capable and available for operational deployment. This excludes aircraft undergoing maintenance, upgrades or long-term storage.

Military analysts emphasize that fleet size alone does not determine combat effectiveness. Factors such as pilot experience, technological integration, logistics support and alliance networks significantly influence overall capability.

Nonetheless, an 18 percent numerical advantage in ready aircraft represents a notable benchmark in comparative military assessments.

China’s Rapid Aviation Expansion​

Over the past two decades, China has significantly expanded and modernized its air force.

Investment in indigenous aircraft production, including advanced fighter jets and support platforms, has increased fleet readiness and reduced dependence on foreign suppliers.

Modern aircraft programs have focused on enhancing range, electronic warfare capability and integrated command systems.

United States Air Power Strategy​

The United States maintains a global network of air bases and alliances that extend its operational reach.

Advanced stealth platforms, aerial refueling systems and carrier-based aviation provide strategic flexibility.

Although the numerical comparison highlights China’s growth, U.S. doctrine emphasizes technological superiority and joint-force integration.

Regional Security Implications​

The balance of air power carries significant implications for regional security, particularly in the Indo-Pacific.

Neighboring countries monitor shifts in capability closely, assessing deterrence dynamics and strategic stability.

Military analysts caution that raw numbers must be evaluated alongside readiness levels, logistical depth and force projection capacity.

Technological Considerations

Stealth technology, electronic warfare systems and integrated satellite communications are critical components of modern air combat.

While China has made advances in these areas, the United States retains experience from decades of operational deployments.

Training intensity and combat simulation exercises also influence effectiveness beyond fleet size.

Reporting Context​

The data comparison was initially highlighted by the verified X account associated with Jackson Hinkle and later cited by hokanews, which confirmed the referenced percentage.

Official military statements from either government did not directly comment on the specific 18 percent figure at the time of reporting.

Global Military Trends

The evolving balance of air power reflects broader geopolitical shifts.

Defense budgets in Asia have increased, with modernization programs focusing on aerospace capabilities.

Strategic competition between major powers increasingly centers on technological advancement and rapid deployment capacity.

Conclusion​

The reported statistic that China’s combat-ready air force is approximately 18 percent larger than that of the United States highlights the scale of Beijing’s military modernization efforts.

While numerical comparisons offer insight into force structure trends, comprehensive assessments must account for technology, training and strategic alliances.

As global defense dynamics continue to evolve, air power remains a central factor shaping deterrence and regional stability.
 
Lol, please ban me, I don't care about what you think.

The point is simply WHY? Why is it so difficult or why are you so obsessed to constantly start new threads often just for random online-reports even when there is a dedicated thread on that specific topic available?

In mind of the quality of your post it cannot be stupidity, so why this stubbornness or arrogance?
 
The point is simply WHY? Why is it so difficult or why are you so obsessed to constantly start new threads often just for random online-reports even when there is a dedicated thread on that specific topic available?

In mind of the quality of your post it cannot be stupidity, so why this stubbornness or arrogance?
The stubborness or arrogance is you trying to keep this forum the way you want, that report is about two countries China and US, why you stubbornly put every thing even remotely related to China under a China only mega thread, just because you want it that way? If you don't like my posting, ban me, better permenantly, I couldn't care less.
 
The stubborness or arrogance is you trying to keep this forum the way you want, that report is about two countries China and US, why you stubbornly put every thing even remotely related to China under a China only mega thread, just because you want it that way? If you don't like my posting, ban me, better permenantly, I couldn't care less.

Dude - it is disrespectful to the "time and effort" of the MODS who try and keep this forum organised and easy for people to both follow and use as a source of aggregated information, versus the random creation of threads that they are forced to keep cleaning up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top