Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

What are you saying? That section of the wall was built by Hz Suleiman AS. It has sanctity for Muslims too.
Wrong this wall is from 2nd temple built by Cyrus the great a Persian king...do you also know the destruction of that temple was a punishment from Almighty.... It was destroyed by Romans after Jews denied Hazrat Isa (A.S) ..So how can a sign of destruction by Almighty can be holy for a Muslim??? For a Jew it is because they always rebelled against Almighty...
Persian built it Persian will destroy it....
 
Correct. I very much doubt it that China will reveal their hidden hand publicly like this.

So Mizar is just repackaging US pictures as their own?

It’s not like Planet Labs is high res military quality. I’m sure the cubesats of Mizar are not either but maybe they simply don’t have adequate orbital latitude coverage in the Middle East and need to use Western companies. Chinese companies do tend to focus industries on serving the Chinese consumer's interest first and everybody else a very distant second so to have a gap isn't unexpected.
 
Last edited:
But where did the rumors that Bahrain king has fled come from? Where there is smoke there is usually fire.
Where most rumors on social media come from. Somewhere in the imagination, between hopium and copium and a little to the left of deludium.
 
But where did the rumors that Bahrain king has fled come from? Where there is smoke there is usually fire.
I think the news is true and i wish same happens in KSA. These munafiq are renting their land for fitna . KSA is a legitimate target as long as it is housing epstein gang and goonies
 
This is even more embarrassing, did the F-18s and F-15s not have IFFs? Isn't this literally the job of the IFF transponders to ping and confirm that who is friendly and who it not?

Year 2026.....and you still have fratricide amongst the richest airforce jets.......

Now imagine these idiotic arabs of GCC had to actually fight a war.....like Plan, execute a war......what would happen.


@MastanKhan
No, IFF's are calibrated by each flying unit at its own base. USAF cryptographic keys will not match Kuwaiti keys unless they agree to share the same keys. Typically done before flying joint missions.
 

US-Israel attacks on Iran breach international law, Swiss defense minister says​

US-Israel attacks on Iran breach international law, Swiss defense minister says

Swiss Defense Minister Martin Pfister is the latest European leader to raise concerns about the conflict. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 16 sec ago
Reuters
March 08, 202610:28






Follow
  • Swiss Defense Minister Martin Pfister is the latest European leader to raise concerns about the conflict
  • Pfister ⁠said he was referring to all ‌the countries not complying with ‌the prohibition on violence
ZURICH/FRANKFURT: The United States and ‌Israel have broken international law with their attacks on Iran, Swiss Defense Minister Martin Pfister said in an interview published on Sunday, the latest European leader to raise concerns about the conflict.

Legal experts have said many countries will consider the attacks unjustified under the United Nations Charter, under which member countries must refrain from using force or the threat of force without UN authorization or unless acting in self-defense.

“The ‌Federal Council is ‌of the opinion that the ‌attack ⁠on Iran constitutes a ⁠violation of international law,” Pfister told SonntagsZeitung, referring to the Swiss cabinet.

“In our view it constitutes a violation on the prohibition of violence,” he added, calling on all parties involved to halt the fighting to protect the civilian population.

Violation of international law

Pfister ⁠said he was referring to all ‌the countries not complying with ‌the prohibition on violence, including the United States and Israel.

“The ‌Americans and Israel have attacked Iran from ‌the air. In doing so, they, like Iran, violated international law,” Pfister said.

The comments chime with those of German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil, who told the ‌RND newspaper network that he had “serious doubts that this war is legitimate under international law.”

Klingbeil ⁠also ⁠came out strongly against the idea of any potential German participation in the war: “I say clearly: this is not our war. We will not participate in this war.”

He said there was a “great danger that we are sliding ever deeper into a world where there are no longer any rules. We do not want to live in a world where only the law of the strongest applies.”

Spain has also denounced the US and Israeli bombings of Iran as reckless and illegal.





Follow
Topics: war on iran US Iran Israel Swtizerland

Related​

Trump’s Iran war violates international law, experts say

Trump’s Iran war violates international law, experts say

UpdateEU, Gulf states call for dialogue while affirming right to defend against Iran

EU, Gulf states call for dialogue while affirming right to defend against Iran


China foreign minister blasts Middle East war, urges US to manage ties

China foreign minister blasts Middle East war, urges US to manage ties

Updated 57 min 13 sec ago
AFP
March 08, 202604:41






Follow
  • Wang Yi: ‘A strong fist does not mean strong reason. The world cannot return to the law of the jungle’
BEIJING: China’s top diplomat condemned on Sunday the war in the Middle East and urged the United States to iron out its differences with Beijing.

Foreign Minister Wang Yi told a press conference in the Chinese capital that the war, which was sparked by US and Israeli strikes on Iran, “should never have happened.”

“A strong fist does not mean strong reason. The world cannot return to the law of the jungle,” he told reporters.

He was speaking during China’s annual political gathering, which began this week, known as the “Two Sessions.”

The parallel meetings of China’s parliament and political consultative body are closely watched for clues as to the priorities of top leaders, in the face of a precarious geopolitical landscape

Wang addressed a range of issues, including a trade war with the United States, regional tensions in the South China Sea, as well as wars in the Middle East and Ukraine.

“This year is indeed a big year for Sino-US relations,” Wang said.

‘Manage differences’

Ties between China and the United States have been strained since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House last year, followed by a trade war that saw the two countries impose tit-for-tat tariffs on each other’s products.

“We observe certain country erecting tariff barriers and pursuing decoupling and supply chain disruption,” Wang said on Sunday.

“These actions are akin to trying to extinguish a fire with fuel. Ultimately, they will backfire and harm itself.”

While China and the United States “cannot change each other,” he said, “we can change the way we interact with each other.”

Wang urged both sides to “create a suitable environment, manage existing differences, and eliminate unnecessary interference.”

But a wide range of disagreements remain.

Beijing has blasted US and Israeli military strikes on Iran, with which it has diplomatic and trade ties.

It has in particular condemned the killing of the country’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Wang also maintained that China’s relations with Moscow, which have been criticized by Western countries for sustaining the war in Ukraine, remained “steadfast and unshakeable.”

China ‘gym’

China has sought to profit off Trump’s volatile foreign policies, positioning itself as a reliable alternative to once traditional US allies.

Leaders from France, Canada, Finland and the United Kingdom, among others, have flocked to Beijing, recoiling from Trump’s bid to seize Greenland and tariff threats against fellow NATO members.

Wang welcomed the visits on Sunday, saying “we have noticed that more and more insightful Europeans agree that China is not a competitor, but a global partner.”

“We welcome our European friends to step out of the ‘small attic’ of protectionism and come to the ‘gym’ of the Chinese market, where they can strengthen their muscles and enhance their competitiveness,” he said.

In the spirit of warming relations, China has doled out visa-free travel agreements to around 50 countries including France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

Beijing has also agreed to reduced tariffs with Ottawa and London in their exports to China.

Wang also addressed relations between China and Japan, which have been locked in a spat after comments by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in November that Tokyo could intervene militarily in any attack on self-ruled Taiwan.

Takaichi’s comments enraged Beijing, which views Taiwan as its territory and has not ruled out taking by force.

Wang emphasized on Sunday that Beijing “will never allow anyone or any force to separate Taiwan … from China once again.”

He warned Japan against “repeating the same disastrous mistakes,” adding that China “will never allow anyone to stand up for colonialism,” in an apparent reference to Tokyo’s actions during World War II.

The issue of Taiwan, he insisted, is “at the heart of China’s core interests” and “a red line that must not be crossed or trampled on.”

 
KSA has brought this upon themselves kick out Americans
Absolutely I hope salman gets the same fate as bahrainian king. Pakistan can’t defend the war in which KSA itself is a aggressor or enabler of aggression
Rules laid out are simple don’t let your land be used for terrorism against iran
 
What are you saying? That section of the wall was built by Hz Suleiman AS. It has sanctity for Muslims too.
And by the way their Mosiach the dajjal will come from that wall or show up at that wall.... So now consider how holy is this wall for a Muslim from where or where the dajjal will show up???
 
Trump’s aim in this current conflict is not regime change. Perhaps that’s his goal in the long run, but this specific event will not initiate it. You cannot have regime change without some opposing force within Iran (troops on the ground) or a proxy initiating said revolt. Could we destroy Iran’s navy with these strikes? Probably. Could we change the regime in charge? Not likely. Keep in mind Iran is a relatively legitimate nation with a chain of succession. There is a greater chance the internal security forces takes charge within Iran.

I see the Trump admin using a recurring pattern of placing leaders under considerable pressure to then be “pliable” to the demands of the US. After’s Maduro’s capture, the vice president of Venezuela took charge; there was no massive change in government. The Venezuelan Gov took it as just another contingency where the president was unable to serve and thus appointed the next successor. However, this VP is now under considerable pressure to give in to the demands of the US. “We can kidnap your president within 10 hours, what do you think we could do if we TRIED?” Thus the Trump admin keeps the legitimacy of the government of Venezuela yet tailors it to their need a forces them to give into our terms.
This was a tactic used by Napoleon in establishing satellite states with a semblance of legitimacy by keeping the rulers in place but making them pliable enough to give into his demands.
I think Trump envisions a slightly drawn out conflict with Iran imo. There’s no way these strikes alone cause a chain of events to initiate regime change; and even if they did there would be catastrophic bloodshed in regional conflicts between still loyal IF’s and the citizens. (There’s factions within citizens as well btw, some still support the Islamic revolution.)


#copied
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top