Oscar
Moderator
Only reaffirms my post above and Adil Raja is willing to sacrifice every Pakistani for his pound of flesh so why should one be surprised.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only reaffirms my post above and Adil Raja is willing to sacrifice every Pakistani for his pound of flesh so why should one be surprised.
Meanwhile Afghans on Twitter still lol:
In all honesty, we need more clear ground footage of dominance, the skies humiliated them enough but ground footage would be the top layer. Burst raids in and out.
Then the cherry on top would be a Northern insurgency
They could have been easily picked by DJI thermal drones. We shouldn't let this go without fighting back. This have been routine that they are firing on convoys ever since operation started against Afghanistan. Not sure why they let it go unanswered.These Afghani Chokray and their lovers in Pakistan also need to be tracked and eliminated
Peak of yookayistani intelligence.
Which capability exactly?A former PAF F-16 pilot told me that they developed that CAPABILTY back in 90s....
Sometimes it's also the nature of how certain claims can spontaneously explode, obviously I agree with you that Attaullah Tarrar should have debunked it immediately before it spread but the Taliban had been saying every strike was against civilians until this one blew up.The same mistakes we made in GWOT era, are being repeated today. We suffered mostly because we failed miserably on the narrative front and it costed us lives.
It was absolutely necessary that ISPR had put out a statement or two sayjng we hit an ammo dump in Afghanistan instead we waited and waited and Taliban account started saying the usual stuff. Any media, would have picked the first official statement from any side and in this case, Taliban were the first to say anything on it.
Secrecy is good, but handling the media and information is best. Lessons to learn.
Musharraf had US backing. Not anymoreAll ok, but changing a stance to 180 is easy for the government, like Mushi did, but takes narrative, time and consistency to translate into the masses.
Yes, only lethal force can be used against forceful incursion or attack, but proportionally. Aircraft strikes if don't accumulate civilian deaths, then morality, narrative and legitimacy are on our side. Very important in the long run.
India has more flexibility as it doesn't share borders, and at least it was popular in the Afghan public (not by TTA before). Pak is hated through and through in Afghanistan now.
We shouldnt be reactive i what i am proposing. Right after the attack, there should have been a statement either from civilian or military office that such such target in afg was attacked and thats it.Sometimes it's also the nature of how certain claims can spontaneously explode, obviously I agree with you that Attaullah Tarrar should have debunked it immediately before it spread but the Taliban had been saying every strike was against civilians until this one blew up.
BBC has confirmed atleast 100 died, the UN has reported 75 bodies before that, sure it might not be 400 but it's still 100
Source: BBC https://share.google/KRqq59aH4l00G2li0
True enough? DuhI don't think the news is true though
They are identical to Hindustanis in terms of civilisational insecurity and consequent cranial capacitance.Problem with these taliban is they think they are superior to Pakistanis. They have a chip on their shoulder and are extremely insecure since Pakistan was created.
Modified it to drop nukes....Which capability exactly?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.