Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Cash gk said:
Massacre is waiting
Click to expand...
Don't sell the skin of the bear before hunting It.

Seems day after day that Trump's need to get out, before chicken out he need to sell everybody a fast victory. All those marines and paratroopers will try achieve any small victory (maybe Abu Musa, Tunb or Tunb koochick) and inmediately after withdraw.

IRGC and Basij must be aware specially this weekend he will play again poker and bet without good cards. He's a gambler.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Dawn:

"Cannot confirm missile targeting Diego Garcia airbase was Iranian, says Nato chief.

Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte has said the alliance “cannot confirm” Israel’s claim that missiles targeting the US-UK Diego Garcia airbase were Iranian, reports Al Jazeera.

Speaking to CBS News, Rutte backed US President Donald Trump’s war on Iran and signalled Nato alignment with Washington, saying member states are expected to rally behind Trump despite delays in coordination.

“I understand the president’s frustration that it takes some time, but again I also ask for some understanding because nations had to prepare for this not knowing,” Rutte said."


...Lavon incident and USS Liberty spring to mind.
 
AZADPAKISTAN2009 said:
Laundry fire does not , leaves a big hole in ship
Laundry Fire does not melts the Steel
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? What "big hole"?

Are you even aware that ship-board fires are more common than you think? Was discussing this with a Marine brother just last week. More than a few occasions of fires on board. One of the ships he was on during a float had a hydraulic pump fire for a hangar elevator.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
What are you talking about? What "big hole"?

Are you even aware that ship-board fires are more common than you think? Was discussing this with a Marine brother just last week. More than a few occasions of fires on board. One of the ships he was on during a float had a hydraulic pump fire for a hangar elevator.
Click to expand...
Has CENTCOM or DoD released any photos of the damage caused by this "fire"?
 
ShapurII said:
Has CENTCOM or DoD released any photos of the damage caused by this "fire"?
Click to expand...
Has CENTCOM or DoD released any photos of damage caused by a missile strike?

Ship-board fires happen. Accept it.

If Ford is now in Crete, what do you think the probability is of there NOT being a photo of the ship already posted if it had indeed been hit by a missile. Every person there with a cellphone or a camera with a telephoto lens is watching that carrier like there is no tomorrow.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
What are you talking about? What "big hole"?

Are you even aware that ship-board fires are more common than you think? Was discussing this with a Marine brother just last week. More than a few occasions of fires on board. One of the ships he was on during a float had a hydraulic pump fire for a hangar elevator.
Click to expand...

Is this the same carrier that had the toliet problem?

If it is, it’s possible crew sabotage then either Iran attack or a routine accident. It would be strange for a laundry room fire to lead to 600 beds needing to be relocated and overwhelming the fire suppression system. Then the decision of going back to a nearby allied port for repairs during a major war, which may or may not have a major land invasion on the horizon.
 
AZADPAKISTAN2009 said:
Ships don't get removed from battle field for a tiny garment fire in storage room

They get removed when the ship becomes disabled
Click to expand...
Did you happen to miss it being reported the fire had spread to other spaces including crews' quarters?

Or that it took 30 hours to suppress the fire?
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
Has CENTCOM or DoD released any photos of damage caused by a missile strike?

Ship-board fires happen. Accept it.

If Ford is now in Crete, what do you think the probability is of there NOT being a photo of the ship already posted if it had indeed been hit by a missile. Every person there with a cellphone or a camera with a telephoto lens is watching that carrier like there is no tomorrow.
Click to expand...
What do you think the possibility is for not being a photo of the damage caused by the accident? As you said, every person there with a cellphone or a camera can take a photo and post it online. Unless they have been instructed not to do so by their superiors.

It seems like they're hiding something.
 
Immortals said:
Is this the same carrier that had the toliet problem?

If it is, it’s possible crew sabotage then either Iran attack or a routine accident. It would be strange for a laundry room fire to lead to 600 beds needing to be relocated and overwhelming the fire suppression system. Then the decision of going back to a nearby allied port for repairs during a major war, which may or may not have a major land invasion on the horizon.
Click to expand...
I've heard conflicting stories. Heard the Ford has had toilet problems. Also rumor of one on the Lincoln as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 4 more.
    • Total: 437 (members: 31, guests: 406)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top