Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tiger, that’s unrealistic. Making aircraft is the most difficult thing ever. Extremely difficult, extremely expensive. There are just few who make them, the US, China, Russia and some in Europe and Asia. Entirely 100 percent can be ruled out.
I think the most feasible way is we copy Mig21 or Su22 aircraft and develop at later stage own aircraft, maybe in 10-20 years. And if even, we need massive technology transfer and high level of imports. Similar way Viettel is doing with the first semiconductor 32nm fab that will make wafers and chips.
Maybe in 10 years. By then the economy is bigger, industrial base bigger. We will see.Maybe Vietnam can first start copying to produce some fighters from other countries like buying license production from Russian SU-27 or SU-30 to build up its aerospace. China first started producing fighters J-5 by copying MIG-17 in the 1950s, and we are now into J-36 and J-50. But, again Vietnam first needs proper heavy industrial bases to make fighters.
Tiger, that’s unrealistic. Making aircraft is the most difficult thing ever. Extremely difficult, extremely expensive. There are just few who make them, the US, China, Russia and some in Europe and Asia. Entirely 100 percent can be ruled out.
I think the most feasible way is we copy Mig21 or Su22 aircraft and develop at later stage own aircraft, maybe in 10-20 years. And if even, we need massive technology transfer and high level of imports. Similar way Viettel is doing with the first semiconductor 32nm fab that will make wafers and chips.
That’s not easy even for China to make 100 percent entirely. Unless you possess all minerals, technology, patents, personal, supply chains, etc.The fab is not hard, but only thing matter is that you need to 100% own the entire supply chain in order to achieve 100% technology sovreignty.
The US cannot 100% own the supply chain, but they do control over their weaker allies in order to hold up the entire supply chain.
China doesn't have any technological allies/subordinates, so it has to 100% own the entire alternative supply chain by itself.
Russia has been sanctioned by the west, but they don't have the capability to own a whole supply chain created by themselves, so they have to be reluctantly dependent on China.
Vietnam has to depend on the western supply chain, but if they do sanction on you, then you have to depend on China's supply chain.
That’s not easy even for China to make 100 percent entirely. Unless you possess all minerals, technology, patents, personal, supply chains, etc.
is that realistic? most likely not.
As for Vietnam, as said we need 2 things: money and technology. The rest we try to get from somewhere from someone.
Is there a list where China is self sufficient? At least 90 percent something? I mean not in minerals making like rare earths but finished stuffs like tanks, airplanes, trains, vehicles? I am just curious, in case Trump runs amok in Far East.China is nearly 100% right now, and that's why the US has become so precarious in this trade/tech war.
Is there a list where China is self sufficient? At least 90 percent something? I mean not in minerals making like rare earths but finished stuffs like tanks, airplanes, trains, vehicles? I am just curious, in case Trump runs amok in Far East.
She tried to make sense what’s the story behind the unprecedented visit of three ministers of China to Vietnam?
Most likely to sync both countries’ security, defense and external politics amid global tensions. Xi Jinping’s southern China as last defense is a very weird speculation.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.